Tyson Fury would have been eaten for dinner in my era, claims Frank Bruno
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 22936
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Tyson Fury would have been eaten for dinner in my era, claims Frank Bruno
Fury uses his extra weight really well in leaning on. He did it to McDermott in the rematch. It's hard work with a man his size laying on you. It's not about power.
-
Riddick Bowie
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 931
- Joined: 19 Jul 2003, 07:25
Re: Tyson Fury would have been eaten for dinner in my era, claims Frank Bruno
One of the most naive and historically illiterate analogies I've read on a boxing forum.skanksta wrote: ↑29 Dec 2021, 18:24I’m no youngster !polecateddy wrote: ↑29 Dec 2021, 14:29You have to be a youngster to say nonsense like that about Mike Tyson. Granted Bruno statement quite accurate.
Who do you fancy to win.., Teo vs Okolie ?
Same size difference.
Lightweights are little people who don't beat light heavyweights, who are big people.
Heavyweights, even little ones, are big people, and they have the requisite power to destroy even bigger heavyweights. It was true 100 years ago when Dempsey smashed Willard, and it was still true 100 days ago when Usyk made made easy work of Joshua.
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32660
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Tyson Fury would have been eaten for dinner in my era, claims Frank Bruno
I suppose I haven’t compared John McDermott to prime Mike Tyson as often as I perhaps should have.mickey1975 wrote: ↑29 Dec 2021, 18:49 Fury uses his extra weight really well in leaning on. He did it to McDermott in the rematch. It's hard work with a man his size laying on you. It's not about power.
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39204
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Tyson Fury would have been eaten for dinner in my era, claims Frank Bruno
big bad john was essentially a taller heavier version of tyson
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 22936
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Tyson Fury would have been eaten for dinner in my era, claims Frank Bruno
He did better against Danny Williams.Boxerbeetle wrote: ↑29 Dec 2021, 20:49I suppose I haven’t compared John McDermott to prime Mike Tyson as often as I perhaps should have.mickey1975 wrote: ↑29 Dec 2021, 18:49 Fury uses his extra weight really well in leaning on. He did it to McDermott in the rematch. It's hard work with a man his size laying on you. It's not about power.
Re: Tyson Fury would have been eaten for dinner in my era, claims Frank Bruno
Tyson Fury would have had no trouble in battering many of the past HW champions of the 80's and 90's. He'd certainly have been the favourite against past champions such as Dokes, Page, Cotzee, Damiani, Smith, Douglas, Bentt, Moorer, Hide, Seldon and Akinwande.
Re: Tyson Fury would have been eaten for dinner in my era, claims Frank Bruno
Of course he wouldn’t.
Re: Tyson Fury would have been eaten for dinner in my era, claims Frank Bruno
Boxerbeetle wrote: ↑29 Dec 2021, 20:49I suppose I haven’t compared John McDermott to prime Mike Tyson as often as I perhaps should have.mickey1975 wrote: ↑29 Dec 2021, 18:49 Fury uses his extra weight really well in leaning on. He did it to McDermott in the rematch. It's hard work with a man his size laying on you. It's not about power.
Re: Tyson Fury would have been eaten for dinner in my era, claims Frank Bruno
John liked painting and Mike liked pigeons- I can't believe I have never noticed before but the similarities are endless.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑29 Dec 2021, 21:07 big bad john was essentially a taller heavier version of tyson
Don't forget that John is a traveller so no wonder Mickey holds him in such high regard.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 22936
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Tyson Fury would have been eaten for dinner in my era, claims Frank Bruno
And you love Mike because he is black? Ali B.bripez wrote: ↑30 Dec 2021, 05:51John liked painting and Mike liked pigeons- I can't believe I have never noticed before but the similarities are endless.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑29 Dec 2021, 21:07 big bad john was essentially a taller heavier version of tyson
Don't forget that John is a traveller so no wonder Mickey holds him in such high regard.
-
polecateddy
- Heavyweight

Re: Tyson Fury would have been eaten for dinner in my era, claims Frank Bruno
Have you just pulled a big list off Wiki? Some of those fighters in their prime were really dangerous. Before addiction issues Dokes was a really dynamic puncher, and Dokes and Page had a really good grounding and decent skill sets. Douglas was obviously very good on that one big big night. Smith would have kept coming for 12 rounds. Hide had that punchers chance. I’m actually a fan of Akinwande, who was tall and awkward, but did develop a punch late in his career. In fact scored an unofficial knock down against Lewis that a lot of people miss. Generally these are much better fighters than Fury has faced in his career barring I suppose the ageing Wlad.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 22936
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Tyson Fury would have been eaten for dinner in my era, claims Frank Bruno
Lennox was very susceptible around the chin, though.polecateddy wrote: ↑30 Dec 2021, 06:10Have you just pulled a big list off Wiki? Some of those fighters in their prime were really dangerous. Before addiction issues Dokes was a really dynamic puncher, and Dokes and Page had a really good grounding and decent skill sets. Douglas was obviously very good on that one big big night. Smith would have kept coming for 12 rounds. Hide had that punchers chance. I’m actually a fan of Akinwande, who was tall and awkward, but did develop a punch late in his career. In fact scored an unofficial knock down against Lewis that a lot of people miss. Generally these are much better fighters than Fury has faced in his career barring I suppose the ageing Wlad.
-
polecateddy
- Heavyweight

Re: Tyson Fury would have been eaten for dinner in my era, claims Frank Bruno
That’s probably not actually that true. He was an active fighter who faced a lot of dangerous fighters and was knocked down twice officially. Contrasted with Fury who has been knocked down multiple times, sometimes by obscure fighters, in an inactive career where he’s hardly faced any dangerous fighters apart from Wilder. Wlad had a lot of history behind him of course, but was fresh off that very unconvincing performance against Bryant Jennings. Clearly he was a fading force at that point.mickey1975 wrote: ↑30 Dec 2021, 06:11Lennox was very susceptible around the chin, though.polecateddy wrote: ↑30 Dec 2021, 06:10Have you just pulled a big list off Wiki? Some of those fighters in their prime were really dangerous. Before addiction issues Dokes was a really dynamic puncher, and Dokes and Page had a really good grounding and decent skill sets. Douglas was obviously very good on that one big big night. Smith would have kept coming for 12 rounds. Hide had that punchers chance. I’m actually a fan of Akinwande, who was tall and awkward, but did develop a punch late in his career. In fact scored an unofficial knock down against Lewis that a lot of people miss. Generally these are much better fighters than Fury has faced in his career barring I suppose the ageing Wlad.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 22936
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Tyson Fury would have been eaten for dinner in my era, claims Frank Bruno
Who mentioned Fury? I'm talking about Lennox. Getting his clock cleaned by two fringe top ten guys is bad. Once could have been forgiven. People like Holmes and Fury go over but get up to win. The hallmark of a champion.
-
polecateddy
- Heavyweight

Re: Tyson Fury would have been eaten for dinner in my era, claims Frank Bruno
But on the flipside Lewis did win both rematches. I think in particular McCall doesn’t get enough credit for coming in so determined and in shape in that first fight. I’d like to see Fury cope with Oliver that night. Rahman was starting to lose in that first fight but still was easily in the best shape of his career.mickey1975 wrote: ↑30 Dec 2021, 06:37 Who mentioned Fury? I'm talking about Lennox. Getting his clock cleaned by two fringe top ten guys is bad. Once could have been forgiven. People like Holmes and Fury go over but get up to win. The hallmark of a champion.
-
Phenomenal-Nutrition
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5185
- Joined: 10 Feb 2005, 14:53
Re: Tyson Fury would have been eaten for dinner in my era, claims Frank Bruno
So much revisinism on here and I lived through those times and watched those fights. In the 80s and 90s people were saying 'boxing isn't as good as it used to be'. There was an awful few years where we saw the biggest heavyweight fights end in DQs for low blows (twice), ear biting, not wanting to fight and prefering to hug, not to mention another fighter who cried in the ring because he'd just been pulled out of rehab. Not to mention a 45yo fat man 1 punching the lineal heavyweight champion. Then the 45yo fat man gets a gift decision in his next fight against Schulz.
Let's play the scorn game like some have been doing with Fury:
Holmes - went life and death with OAP Norton and Witherspoon in his prime. Avoided most of the best heavyweights for years. Then lost (probably won the rematch tbf) against a weakling Light heavyweight after probably deserving to lose the Williams fight the one before that.
Bowe - the whole 'he was past prime against Golota'. Well he was fat in the first fight. But he was always a bit fat and got outboxed in his prime he got schooled by an old Tony Tubbs and Evander Holyfield who didn't like to box. His trained Eddie Futch told Emanuel Steward that he thought Lennox Lewis was too strong and would walk through Bowe for the record. Bowe was incredibly lazy. He was taught head movement by Futch but he couldn't be bothered to use it. I think Futch had enough of him towards the end.
Tyson - beat old men, strong men who couldn't box, light heavyweights but not any actual elite heavyweights. Teddy Atlas has said for years that Tyson lost in all the real fights he had. That he lost whenever someone could stand up to him. Too an extent most of the fights he won were won on the build up to the fight. Everyone was scared of his intimidation.
Lennox - I can't really knock Lennox, he took on all comers and beat every man he faced. Ballsy in the way he'd goto war. At the time I didn't like him because I was a Tyson fan.
Holyfield - just a very patchy record. I remember the complaints when he was champion. The way he took the title from a fat Douglas was impressive. Then in his homecoming fight was out on his feet against Cooper before rallying back. Couldn't put Foreman or Holmes away. Lost against Bowe, regains against a fat Bowe. The loses in his next fight against a blown up light heavyweight who really wasn't that amazing.
Douglas - a great talent that quit against Tucker and literally ate himself into a diabetic coma. Great for a night and that night he beats any version of Tyson.
Hide was a manufactured fighter who had very few serious fights and was made of utter china. I'm unsure how Hide's win over a journeyman Bentt for the WBO belt is better Stevie Cunningham becoming the number 1 cruserweight on the planet by beating numerous champions and even in his losses going to the wire against the best crusers. Cunningham was bigger than Hide too.
Akinwande got DQ'ed for not wanting to fight against Lewis. But yes he put him down. There's a reason no one notices, it's because no one wants to watch a fight where 1 man is scared to fight. He was skilled and athletic but he was liable to get ragdolled. In 1998 there was actually a fight between Holyfield and Akinwande before Henry caught Hepatitis I think it was. Akinwande might, might just have done a John Ruiz on Holyfield if Holyfield doesn't chin check him.
Smith's was an extremely limited fighter to say the least, probably the most limited HW belt holder in the 80s, and he certainly didn't keep coming for 12 rounds against Tyson. He only started fighting in round 12 after being scared holding on for dear life for 11 rounds.
Let's play the scorn game like some have been doing with Fury:
Holmes - went life and death with OAP Norton and Witherspoon in his prime. Avoided most of the best heavyweights for years. Then lost (probably won the rematch tbf) against a weakling Light heavyweight after probably deserving to lose the Williams fight the one before that.
Bowe - the whole 'he was past prime against Golota'. Well he was fat in the first fight. But he was always a bit fat and got outboxed in his prime he got schooled by an old Tony Tubbs and Evander Holyfield who didn't like to box. His trained Eddie Futch told Emanuel Steward that he thought Lennox Lewis was too strong and would walk through Bowe for the record. Bowe was incredibly lazy. He was taught head movement by Futch but he couldn't be bothered to use it. I think Futch had enough of him towards the end.
Tyson - beat old men, strong men who couldn't box, light heavyweights but not any actual elite heavyweights. Teddy Atlas has said for years that Tyson lost in all the real fights he had. That he lost whenever someone could stand up to him. Too an extent most of the fights he won were won on the build up to the fight. Everyone was scared of his intimidation.
Lennox - I can't really knock Lennox, he took on all comers and beat every man he faced. Ballsy in the way he'd goto war. At the time I didn't like him because I was a Tyson fan.
Holyfield - just a very patchy record. I remember the complaints when he was champion. The way he took the title from a fat Douglas was impressive. Then in his homecoming fight was out on his feet against Cooper before rallying back. Couldn't put Foreman or Holmes away. Lost against Bowe, regains against a fat Bowe. The loses in his next fight against a blown up light heavyweight who really wasn't that amazing.
Douglas - a great talent that quit against Tucker and literally ate himself into a diabetic coma. Great for a night and that night he beats any version of Tyson.
Such revisionism barring the part that Dokes and Page had good skills and decent hand speed.polecateddy wrote: ↑30 Dec 2021, 06:10Have you just pulled a big list off Wiki? Some of those fighters in their prime were really dangerous. Before addiction issues Dokes was a really dynamic puncher, and Dokes and Page had a really good grounding and decent skill sets. Douglas was obviously very good on that one big big night. Smith would have kept coming for 12 rounds. Hide had that punchers chance. I’m actually a fan of Akinwande, who was tall and awkward, but did develop a punch late in his career. In fact scored an unofficial knock down against Lewis that a lot of people miss. Generally these are much better fighters than Fury has faced in his career barring I suppose the ageing Wlad.
Hide was a manufactured fighter who had very few serious fights and was made of utter china. I'm unsure how Hide's win over a journeyman Bentt for the WBO belt is better Stevie Cunningham becoming the number 1 cruserweight on the planet by beating numerous champions and even in his losses going to the wire against the best crusers. Cunningham was bigger than Hide too.
Akinwande got DQ'ed for not wanting to fight against Lewis. But yes he put him down. There's a reason no one notices, it's because no one wants to watch a fight where 1 man is scared to fight. He was skilled and athletic but he was liable to get ragdolled. In 1998 there was actually a fight between Holyfield and Akinwande before Henry caught Hepatitis I think it was. Akinwande might, might just have done a John Ruiz on Holyfield if Holyfield doesn't chin check him.
Smith's was an extremely limited fighter to say the least, probably the most limited HW belt holder in the 80s, and he certainly didn't keep coming for 12 rounds against Tyson. He only started fighting in round 12 after being scared holding on for dear life for 11 rounds.
-
polecateddy
- Heavyweight

Re: Tyson Fury would have been eaten for dinner in my era, claims Frank Bruno
It’s all good fun. Bowe was quite good though. I think the general consensus is that pre Stewart he was probably too good for Lewis, the early version. I don’t think he was fat, certainly not in comparison to say Fury or even Whyte. I think regardless of the past revisionism it’s really quite hard to rate the current crop as other than thin in depth and true ability.
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39204
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Tyson Fury would have been eaten for dinner in my era, claims Frank Bruno
another hallmark of a champ is sticking around and consistently taking on good challengers. fury's been a champ for 1 fight , vs a guy he'd already fought twice lolmickey1975 wrote: ↑30 Dec 2021, 06:37 Who mentioned Fury? I'm talking about Lennox. Getting his clock cleaned by two fringe top ten guys is bad. Once could have been forgiven. People like Holmes and Fury go over but get up to win. The hallmark of a champion.
Re: Tyson Fury would have been eaten for dinner in my era, claims Frank Bruno
And who could have guessed things could get worse; yet here we arePhenomenal-Nutrition wrote: ↑30 Dec 2021, 08:55 So much revisinism on here and I lived through those times and watched those fights. In the 80s and 90s people were saying 'boxing isn't as good as it used to be'.
Re: Tyson Fury would have been eaten for dinner in my era, claims Frank Bruno
Yes, I looked at a Wiki list and gave a list of the past 80's and 90's champions who I believe that Fury would beat. Do you really think that Akinwande and Dokes would 'eat Fury for dinner'?polecateddy wrote: ↑30 Dec 2021, 06:10Have you just pulled a big list off Wiki? Some of those fighters in their prime were really dangerous. Before addiction issues Dokes was a really dynamic puncher, and Dokes and Page had a really good grounding and decent skill sets. Douglas was obviously very good on that one big big night. Smith would have kept coming for 12 rounds. Hide had that punchers chance. I’m actually a fan of Akinwande, who was tall and awkward, but did develop a punch late in his career. In fact scored an unofficial knock down against Lewis that a lot of people miss. Generally these are much better fighters than Fury has faced in his career barring I suppose the ageing Wlad.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 22936
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Tyson Fury would have been eaten for dinner in my era, claims Frank Bruno
Yeah, we've heard you, Marg.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑30 Dec 2021, 09:32another hallmark of a champ is sticking around and consistently taking on good challengers. fury's been a champ for 1 fight , vs a guy he'd already fought twice lolmickey1975 wrote: ↑30 Dec 2021, 06:37 Who mentioned Fury? I'm talking about Lennox. Getting his clock cleaned by two fringe top ten guys is bad. Once could have been forgiven. People like Holmes and Fury go over but get up to win. The hallmark of a champion.
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39204
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Tyson Fury would have been eaten for dinner in my era, claims Frank Bruno
just trying to keep up with you my man 
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39204
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Tyson Fury would have been eaten for dinner in my era, claims Frank Bruno
dokes had more than good hand speed btw, those hands were f@cking absurdly fast. a+ speed, loved when he'd whip in those combos. but yes i think fury wouldve beaten him
Re: Tyson Fury would have been eaten for dinner in my era, claims Frank Bruno
The 80's was a terrible era, Holmes stood well apart, Tyson easily cleaned up the division but with little resistance.
Then coming out of jail he wasn't the same.
Bowe, Holyfield and Lewis were quality fighters. Lewis was liable to get knocked out if he took his eye of the ball, Bowe's conditioning really did vary.
The Klits were dominant in another poor era, demonstrating how conditioning is usually more important than natural talent.
Past that you have Wilder and AJ who again show how important conditioning is, then Fury who has shown that if his mind and conditioning is right is a level above his contemporaries, perhaps real talent supercedes everything as long as you have spent some time in the gym.
Then coming out of jail he wasn't the same.
Bowe, Holyfield and Lewis were quality fighters. Lewis was liable to get knocked out if he took his eye of the ball, Bowe's conditioning really did vary.
The Klits were dominant in another poor era, demonstrating how conditioning is usually more important than natural talent.
Past that you have Wilder and AJ who again show how important conditioning is, then Fury who has shown that if his mind and conditioning is right is a level above his contemporaries, perhaps real talent supercedes everything as long as you have spent some time in the gym.
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39204
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Tyson Fury would have been eaten for dinner in my era, claims Frank Bruno
still gotta beat usyk to show he's the king, levels above all the rest
usyk beating aj comfortable on 1 try is right up there with fury beating wilder. aj and wilder are similar level.
usyk beating aj comfortable on 1 try is right up there with fury beating wilder. aj and wilder are similar level.