Tyson Fury vs. Dillian Whyte | BT PPV - 23 April 2022

Who wins?

Poll ended at 23 Apr 2022, 11:41

Fury - Decision
63
31%
Fury - T/KO
109
54%
DRAW
3
1%
Whyte - T/KO
24
12%
Whyte - Decision
3
1%
 
Total votes: 202

handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23017
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Tyson Fury vs. Dillian Whyte - WBC Ordered

Post by handsofstone »

Dioufy wrote: 31 Dec 2021, 07:36 Would love Top Rank to come in with a low offer and let Hearn host it by having to pay big for the fight to please Whyte.
Fight won’t happen.
Fury will fight Helenius for the belt in March.
Whyte will try an different organisation and get splashed again en route.
More chance Fury vacating or being made Franchise champ imo
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22951
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Tyson Fury vs. Dillian Whyte - WBC Ordered

Post by mickey1975 »

handsofstone wrote: 31 Dec 2021, 07:45
Dioufy wrote: 31 Dec 2021, 07:36 Would love Top Rank to come in with a low offer and let Hearn host it by having to pay big for the fight to please Whyte.
Fight won’t happen.
Fury will fight Helenius for the belt in March.
Whyte will try an different organisation and get splashed again en route.
More chance Fury vacating or being made Franchise champ imo
Hearn will not be allowed to promote the champ. Ever.
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39224
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Tyson Fury vs. Dillian Whyte - WBC Ordered

Post by margaret thatcher »

hearn copromotes da champ of the world, 19 fights 19 wins baby
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22951
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Tyson Fury vs. Dillian Whyte - WBC Ordered

Post by mickey1975 »

margaret thatcher wrote: 31 Dec 2021, 08:20 hearn copromotes da champ of the world, 19 fights 19 wins baby
Yeah, he's massive in America....
maverick23
Cruiserweight
Posts: 10375
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20

Re: Tyson Fury vs. Dillian Whyte - WBC Ordered

Post by maverick23 »

mickey1975 wrote: 31 Dec 2021, 05:13
Boxing Prospect wrote: 31 Dec 2021, 04:30
maverick23 wrote: 30 Dec 2021, 18:15

AJ/Usyk was pretty interesting.
Was also ordered by the WBO, so not sure we can give Eddie all the credit for the fact Usyk was Joshua's mandatory
People reckon they did everything they could to avoid facing Usyk.
Which people?! They could have easily avoided the fight if they wanted to - just drop the WBO belt.

AJ might have been exposed as a good on top fighter who’s lost his bottle a little bit but he always took on the best challengers he could which deserves credit.
maverick23
Cruiserweight
Posts: 10375
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20

Re: Tyson Fury vs. Dillian Whyte - WBC Ordered

Post by maverick23 »

Boxing Prospect wrote: 31 Dec 2021, 04:30
maverick23 wrote: 30 Dec 2021, 18:15
mickey1975 wrote: 30 Dec 2021, 15:40 Which one was more interesting than Dubois-Joyce?
AJ/Usyk was pretty interesting.
Was also ordered by the WBO, so not sure we can give Eddie all the credit for the fact Usyk was Joshua's mandatory
Yeah - the WBO deserve credit for having a top mandatory which isn’t always the case but the conversation was about biggest U.K. heavyweight fights in recent years and, regardless of the reasons why, Matchroom have promoted 90% of them.
joshj909
Lightweight
Posts: 5894
Joined: 01 Dec 2017, 06:16

Re: Tyson Fury vs. Dillian Whyte - WBC Ordered

Post by joshj909 »

How can the WBC win this in arbitration if this is in their own rules?
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39224
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Tyson Fury vs. Dillian Whyte - WBC Ordered

Post by margaret thatcher »

well, look at that last clause, dont it basically say they can do whatever they want and that all the previous stuff can be done away with as they please :lol:
joshj909
Lightweight
Posts: 5894
Joined: 01 Dec 2017, 06:16

Re: Tyson Fury vs. Dillian Whyte - WBC Ordered

Post by joshj909 »

margaret thatcher wrote: 31 Dec 2021, 08:57 well, look at that last clause, it basically says they can do whatever they want and that all the previous stuff can be done away with as they please :lol:
Even the last clause limits it at 70:30. They're trying to give him less than a regular mandatory :lol: the marketing value point is a terrible legal argument aswell.
maverick23
Cruiserweight
Posts: 10375
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20

Re: Tyson Fury vs. Dillian Whyte - WBC Ordered

Post by maverick23 »

mickey1975 wrote: 31 Dec 2021, 08:17
handsofstone wrote: 31 Dec 2021, 07:45
Dioufy wrote: 31 Dec 2021, 07:36 Would love Top Rank to come in with a low offer and let Hearn host it by having to pay big for the fight to please Whyte.
Fight won’t happen.
Fury will fight Helenius for the belt in March.
Whyte will try an different organisation and get splashed again en route.
More chance Fury vacating or being made Franchise champ imo
Hearn will not be allowed to promote the champ. Ever.
Not quite sure why. It’s not like it’s Triller and there’ll be issues re: dates/non payment. If it does go to purse bids I’m sure there will be at least one silly bus and if it’s won by Matchroom then Fury will be silly not to do it.
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23017
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Tyson Fury vs. Dillian Whyte - WBC Ordered

Post by handsofstone »

mickey1975 wrote: 31 Dec 2021, 08:17
handsofstone wrote: 31 Dec 2021, 07:45
Dioufy wrote: 31 Dec 2021, 07:36 Would love Top Rank to come in with a low offer and let Hearn host it by having to pay big for the fight to please Whyte.
Fight won’t happen.
Fury will fight Helenius for the belt in March.
Whyte will try an different organisation and get splashed again en route.
More chance Fury vacating or being made Franchise champ imo
Hearn will not be allowed to promote the champ. Ever.
I agree tbh but it's a sad state of affairs that he'll allow his career to be stalled, derailed or whatever just out of spite, Fury works with Arum and Warren ffs, those 2 spend as much time I'm court than they do promoting, i get that Eddie rubs people up wrong way but can't recall him being sued or paying his fighters late, Arum publicly slags his own fighters for not being stars when he's been on charge of building them, Warren's a bitter man who can't accept he isn't number 1 in British boxing anymore, fact is Hearn made the undisputed fight with Joshua and Fury/Arum backed out without even attempting to pay Wilder step aside and I strongly believe they'll back out the Whyte fight, I get people like Fury and dislike Whyte/Hearn but surely as a boxing fan guys can't justify this bullshit, if you do then you can't convince me your anything other than a fanboy, hater and would probably be best off watching WWE for the outside ring drama if you've no interest in seeing good fights

That's no aimed at you per se Mickey just anyone in general who thinks that way

Also apologies for using the word hater
maverick23
Cruiserweight
Posts: 10375
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20

Re: Tyson Fury vs. Dillian Whyte - WBC Ordered

Post by maverick23 »

margaret thatcher wrote: 31 Dec 2021, 08:57 well, look at that last clause, dont it basically say they can do whatever they want and that all the previous stuff can be done away with as they please :lol:
Yeah. The one thing this shows is how the WBC just do what they want. It helps no one really.
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39224
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Tyson Fury vs. Dillian Whyte - WBC Ordered

Post by margaret thatcher »

handsofstone wrote: 31 Dec 2021, 09:04
mickey1975 wrote: 31 Dec 2021, 08:17
handsofstone wrote: 31 Dec 2021, 07:45

More chance Fury vacating or being made Franchise champ imo
Hearn will not be allowed to promote the champ. Ever.
I agree tbh but it's a sad state of affairs that he'll allow his career to be stalled, derailed or whatever just out of spite, Fury works with Arum and Warren ffs, those 2 spend as much time I'm court than they do promoting, i get that Eddie rubs people up wrong way but can't recall him being sued or paying his fighters late, Arum publicly slags his own fighters for not being stars when he's been on charge of building them, Warren's a bitter man who can't accept he isn't number 1 in British boxing anymore, fact is Hearn made the undisputed fight with Joshua and Fury/Arum backed out without even attempting to pay Wilder step aside and I strongly believe they'll back out the Whyte fight, I get people like Fury and dislike Whyte/Hearn but surely as a boxing fan guys can't justify this bullshit, if you do then you can't convince me your anything other than a fanboy, hater and would probably be best off watching WWE for the outside ring drama if you've no interest in seeing good fights

That's no aimed at you per se Mickey just anyone in general who thinks that way

Also apologies for using the word hater
furys side and his fans are all about spite. they cheer for fury to sit around not fighting than to fight whyte, has been the same reaction for an aj fight too. their ideal scenario is endless wilder-fury fights
Last edited by margaret thatcher on 31 Dec 2021, 09:06, edited 1 time in total.
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23017
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Tyson Fury vs. Dillian Whyte - WBC Ordered

Post by handsofstone »

Wonder how much Whyte has paid the WBC cartel in sanctioning fees only to get regularly fcvled up the ass :lol:
joshj909
Lightweight
Posts: 5894
Joined: 01 Dec 2017, 06:16

Re: Tyson Fury vs. Dillian Whyte - WBC Ordered

Post by joshj909 »

handsofstone wrote: 31 Dec 2021, 09:06 Wonder how much Whyte has paid the WBC cartel in sanctioning fees only to get regularly fcvled up the ass :lol:
I think he'd have a fair case claiming those fees back of they enforce 70:30.
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39224
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Tyson Fury vs. Dillian Whyte - WBC Ordered

Post by margaret thatcher »

whyte should pose for some photos in fishnets and send those to mauricio, and then see if that helps at all
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23017
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Tyson Fury vs. Dillian Whyte - WBC Ordered

Post by handsofstone »

margaret thatcher wrote: 31 Dec 2021, 09:05
handsofstone wrote: 31 Dec 2021, 09:04
mickey1975 wrote: 31 Dec 2021, 08:17
Hearn will not be allowed to promote the champ. Ever.
I agree tbh but it's a sad state of affairs that he'll allow his career to be stalled, derailed or whatever just out of spite, Fury works with Arum and Warren ffs, those 2 spend as much time I'm court than they do promoting, i get that Eddie rubs people up wrong way but can't recall him being sued or paying his fighters late, Arum publicly slags his own fighters for not being stars when he's been on charge of building them, Warren's a bitter man who can't accept he isn't number 1 in British boxing anymore, fact is Hearn made the undisputed fight with Joshua and Fury/Arum backed out without even attempting to pay Wilder step aside and I strongly believe they'll back out the Whyte fight, I get people like Fury and dislike Whyte/Hearn but surely as a boxing fan guys can't justify this bullshit, if you do then you can't convince me your anything other than a fanboy, hater and would probably be best off watching WWE for the outside ring drama if you've no interest in seeing good fights

That's no aimed at you per se Mickey just anyone in general who thinks that way

Also apologies for using the word hater
furys side and his fans are all about spite. they cheer for fury to sit around not fighting than to fight whyte, has been the same reaction for an aj fight too. their ideal scenario is endless wilder-fury fights
It's baffling, don't get me wrong there's Matchroom fanboys and PBC fanboys who are probably the worst of the lot but I just can't fathom how a fan of the sport can ignore the nonsense, I genuinely believe theres an agenda in America to alienate Eddie Hearn, Arum probably won't work with him again after ballsing up the undisputed fight, Haymon, Espinoza, Oscar, Ellerbe all despise him and would rather ruin their fighters career than work with Eddie, even of it meant a Matchroom guy fighting on one of their own shows they still woidl never allow it

Who knows maybe Eddie is full of sh1t when he calls out the guys from PBC etc but all those cats are even too petrified to call Hearn',s bluff and start even trying to negotiate
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22951
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Tyson Fury vs. Dillian Whyte - WBC Ordered

Post by mickey1975 »

I enjoy being called a fanboii or whatever I get called. I was ringside in 87 and being again in 100's since. I dont think Eddie has been responsible for 90% of uk heavyweight matches? Who? AJ-Whyte? Did he do Dubious-Gorman? Dubois-Joyce?
joshj909
Lightweight
Posts: 5894
Joined: 01 Dec 2017, 06:16

Re: Tyson Fury vs. Dillian Whyte - WBC Ordered

Post by joshj909 »

mickey1975 wrote: 31 Dec 2021, 09:16 I enjoy being called a fanboii or whatever I get called. I was ringside in 87 and being again in 100's since. I dont think Eddie has been responsible for 90% of uk heavyweight matches? Who? AJ-Whyte? Did he do Dubious-Gorman? Dubois-Joyce?
Those are not world level domestic fights.
maverick23
Cruiserweight
Posts: 10375
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20

Re: Tyson Fury vs. Dillian Whyte - WBC Ordered

Post by maverick23 »

joshj909 wrote: 31 Dec 2021, 09:22
mickey1975 wrote: 31 Dec 2021, 09:16 I enjoy being called a fanboii or whatever I get called. I was ringside in 87 and being again in 100's since. I dont think Eddie has been responsible for 90% of uk heavyweight matches? Who? AJ-Whyte? Did he do Dubious-Gorman? Dubois-Joyce?
Those are not world level domestic fights.
Dubois/Joyce was a really good fight that people were really looking forward to. Dubois/Gorman wasn’t as no one really cared about Gorman before or since. Crikey - if Dubois/Gorman is the 2nd biggest non-Matchroom heavyweight fight then surely that tells you something.

What comes after this? Joyce/Takam? Dubois/Fujimoto?
joshj909
Lightweight
Posts: 5894
Joined: 01 Dec 2017, 06:16

Re: Tyson Fury vs. Dillian Whyte - WBC Ordered

Post by joshj909 »

maverick23 wrote: 31 Dec 2021, 09:58
joshj909 wrote: 31 Dec 2021, 09:22
mickey1975 wrote: 31 Dec 2021, 09:16 I enjoy being called a fanboii or whatever I get called. I was ringside in 87 and being again in 100's since. I dont think Eddie has been responsible for 90% of uk heavyweight matches? Who? AJ-Whyte? Did he do Dubious-Gorman? Dubois-Joyce?
Those are not world level domestic fights.
Dubois/Joyce was a really good fight that people were really looking forward to. Dubois/Gorman wasn’t as no one really cared about Gorman before or since. Crikey - if Dubois/Gorman is the 2nd biggest non-Matchroom heavyweight fight then surely that tells you something.

What comes after this? Joyce/Takam? Dubois/Fujimoto?
If it's British Vs British then it's probably Hughie Vs Sexton. Huge fight. Everyone in the world was talking about it :lol:
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22951
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Tyson Fury vs. Dillian Whyte - WBC Ordered

Post by mickey1975 »

Eddie didn't do Lewis-Bruno. Tell me the heavyweight fights he's done, Brit v Brit.
joshj909
Lightweight
Posts: 5894
Joined: 01 Dec 2017, 06:16

Re: Tyson Fury vs. Dillian Whyte - WBC Ordered

Post by joshj909 »

mickey1975 wrote: 31 Dec 2021, 12:54 Eddie didn't do Lewis-Bruno. Tell me the heavyweight fights he's done, Brit v Brit.
You're right. At 41, allegedly was a bigger and better boxing promoter than Eddie Hearn when Hearn was 14.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22951
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Tyson Fury vs. Dillian Whyte - WBC Ordered

Post by mickey1975 »

joshj909 wrote: 31 Dec 2021, 13:10
mickey1975 wrote: 31 Dec 2021, 12:54 Eddie didn't do Lewis-Bruno. Tell me the heavyweight fights he's done, Brit v Brit.
You're right. At 41, allegedly was a bigger and better boxing promoter than Eddie Hearn when Hearn was 14.
I thought it was Panix.
Dioufy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7351
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 23:09

Re: Tyson Fury vs. Dillian Whyte - WBC Ordered

Post by Dioufy »

Seems the WBC are scared that Tyson vacates. Cannot imagine the arbitrator saying 80/20 is ok. Therefore Fury will vacate if it’s deemed 55/45.
Either way… it seems Whyte isn’t fighting until the summer.
The fornicator should’ve fought Wallin and if he did that well, then it makes Fury’s position less strong.
Post Reply