The heavyyweight fight of the 20th century

Post Reply

Which was the heavyweight fight of the 20th century

Johnson vs. Jeffries 1910
3
13%
Louis vs. Schmeling 1938
3
13%
Frazier vs. Ali 1971
11
46%
Ali vs. Foreman 1974
7
29%
 
Total votes: 24

pundit
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

The heavyyweight fight of the 20th century

Post by pundit »

Inspired by the other thread.
pundit
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: The heavyyweight fight of the 20th century

Post by pundit »

Bump.
JC
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4516
Joined: 07 Jan 2004, 13:04

Post by JC »

Very hard to pick as gloved heavyweight boxing has been largely a 20th century phenomena.

In terms of social significance it is probably Johnson vs Jefferies, in terms of political significance probably Louis vs Schmeiling and purely as a boxing match probably Ali vs Frazier.
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11172
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Post by Ezzard »

J-C wrote:Very hard to pick as gloved heavyweight boxing has been largely a 20th century phenomena.

In terms of social significance it is probably Johnson vs Jefferies, in terms of political significance probably Louis vs Schmeiling and purely as a boxing match probably Ali vs Frazier.
Agree 100%
barry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3797
Joined: 28 Dec 2001, 20:00

re

Post by barry »

>>>Agree 100%<<<

Me also!!!
HomicideHenry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 18722
Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43

Post by HomicideHenry »

I am surprised you didn't list these other "Fight of the Century" bout:

Jack Dempsey vs Jess Willard- far more entertaining than Ali-Frazier, in my opinion. But I agree, in terms of political matters Louis vs Schmeling.

But the very first Fight of the Century, Johnson-Jefferies, I think meant the most to not just boxing, but to the entire world at that time, no fight was bigger and more talked about than Johnson-Jefferies, to put into persepctive it was as hyped up as Cooney-Holmes/Tyson-Lewis combined.
pundit
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Post by pundit »

IrishRufusMurphy wrote:I am surprised you didn't list these other "Fight of the Century" bout:

Jack Dempsey vs Jess Willard- far more entertaining than Ali-Frazier, in my opinion. But I agree, in terms of political matters Louis vs Schmeling.

But the very first Fight of the Century, Johnson-Jefferies, I think meant the most to not just boxing, but to the entire world at that time, no fight was bigger and more talked about than Johnson-Jefferies, to put into persepctive it was as hyped up as Cooney-Holmes/Tyson-Lewis combined.
Johnson-Jeffries is a very legit choice. In terms of hype it is probably on an equal level with the three other fights, but as someone has pointed out before, each of these fihgts created hype for different reasons.

Dempsey-Willard? Compared to the folks listed above, Willard was a big bum, and Dempsey beat him up. And a fight with a bum involved can hardly be the "fight of the century"...

Cheers, P
HomicideHenry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 18722
Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43

Post by HomicideHenry »

Looking back at Willard's career he was not as great as other champions before or after him, but Willard wasn't a complete "bum". He beat Johnson, and irregardless what people have to say about Johnson, he was slimmer for that fight than he had been in years---he trained hard for Willard, and for the first 20 rounds was beating Willard, until Willard got his second wind.

Willard was the best of the 'white hopes' outside of Luther McCarty, and you can't really knock the man, considering he took such an awful beating from Johnson and managed to win, took an awful terrific beating from Dempsey and tried to keep going on broken ribs, jaw and all. He had alot of heart, had a good punch, knew how to use his size well, and was tough, and he could body-punch a little.

He was better than Carnera, in my opinion. and the fight was hyped up alot; for instance, one of the many pre-fight quotes was "How can this little mohagony man stand up against this giant of a man with the arms of a wrestler?" It was billed as the 'Fight of the Century', and in my opinion was far more thrilling than Ali-Frazier and even Jefferies-Johnson.

But my opinion still stands, Johnson-Jefferies was the most important, as well as the most influencial and meaningful of the fights.
pundit
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Post by pundit »

IrishRufusMurphy wrote:Looking back at Willard's career he was not as great as other champions before or after him, but Willard wasn't a complete "bum". He beat Johnson, and irregardless what people have to say about Johnson, he was slimmer for that fight than he had been in years---he trained hard for Willard, and for the first 20 rounds was beating Willard, until Willard got his second wind.

Willard was the best of the 'white hopes' outside of Luther McCarty, and you can't really knock the man, considering he took such an awful beating from Johnson and managed to win, took an awful terrific beating from Dempsey and tried to keep going on broken ribs, jaw and all. He had alot of heart, had a good punch, knew how to use his size well, and was tough, and he could body-punch a little.

He was better than Carnera, in my opinion. and the fight was hyped up alot; for instance, one of the many pre-fight quotes was "How can this little mohagony man stand up against this giant of a man with the arms of a wrestler?" It was billed as the 'Fight of the Century', and in my opinion was far more thrilling than Ali-Frazier and even Jefferies-Johnson.

But my opinion still stands, Johnson-Jefferies was the most important, as well as the most influencial and meaningful of the fights.
I voted Louis-Schmeling, but Johnson-Jeffries or Frazier-Ali seem just as legit to me. Ali-Foreman - hmmm. The most entertaining of the 4 fights for sure, and the greatest upset. But maybe not quite on the same level in terms of significance.
pundit
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: The heavyyweight fight of the 20th century

Post by pundit »

Bump.

Frazier-Ali seems to make it.
Martin Sosa Cameron
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1012
Joined: 31 Aug 2005, 19:44

Post by Martin Sosa Cameron »

It's easy:

Dempsey vs Firpo


:box:
pundit
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Post by pundit »

Martin Sosa Cameron wrote:It's easy:

Dempsey vs Firpo


:box:
???

If a slugfest I'd rather go for Foreman-Lyle.
BoxBuzz
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 29847
Joined: 07 Jun 2005, 16:37

Post by BoxBuzz »

pundit wrote:
Martin Sosa Cameron wrote:It's easy:

Dempsey vs Firpo


:box:
???

If a slugfest I'd rather go for Foreman-Lyle.
I think we are talking what got the attention of the Nation or maybe the world.....And I have to add on strictly a social concious level I would go for Ali Frazier. But on a boxing level (what boxing fans wanted to see) I would go with Ali Foreman. Which is what I ultimately voted for. We also all had a month of mystery to add to the excitement when it was delayed.

Foreman Lyle got our attention afterwards...I think everyone has seen that fight because someone told them it was great. Not that many tuned in on that day.
pundit
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Post by pundit »

BoxBuzz wrote:
pundit wrote:
Martin Sosa Cameron wrote:It's easy:

Dempsey vs Firpo


:box:
???

If a slugfest I'd rather go for Foreman-Lyle.
I think we are talking what got the attention of the Nation or maybe the world.....And I have to add on strictly a social concious level I would go for Ali Frazier. But on a boxing level (what boxing fans wanted to see) I would go with Ali Foreman. Which is what I ultimately voted for. We also all had a month of mystery to add to the excitement when it was delayed.

Foreman Lyle got our attention afterwards...I think everyone has seen that fight because someone told them it was great. Not that many tuned in on that day.
I believe in terms of anticipation before the fight these four were the four top-grossers; and all of them were perceived #1 vs. #2 in boxing terms.
Post Reply