Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

rhino222
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6616
Joined: 09 Sep 2005, 09:38

Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Post by rhino222 »

I thought this deserved a thread of its own despite there being a lengthy Khan/Brook one already.
We are alway quick to criticise the undercards Eddie Hearn dishes up but for a pay-per-view event undercard this is an absolute stinker...probably the worst PPV undercard ever seen. Apart from the Natasha Jonas fight there is nothing and no one (and the Jonas fight isnt all that either).

So why?........ is it -

Because Brook/Khan have drained all of the funds with their financial demands?

Because the Boxxer stable isnt strong enough to carry 2 big shows in a fortnight?

Because Ben Shalom isnt a big enough pull yet to stack a big PPV card (prob linked to the point above)?

Because the tickets sold out so quickly based on the main event that there is absolutely no need to stack the undercard?

Should the Williams/Eubank fight have been on the same card as Brook/Khan PPV?
Frostieballs
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 2017
Joined: 15 Aug 2020, 17:38

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Post by Frostieballs »

It is simply good business.

A good undercard will not add anything in terms of ticket or PPV sales.

So why pay for it?
maverick23
Cruiserweight
Posts: 10375
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Post by maverick23 »

rhino222 wrote: 15 Feb 2022, 13:37 I thought this deserved a thread of its own despite there being a lengthy Khan/Brook one already.
We are alway quick to criticise the undercards Eddie Hearn dishes up but for a pay-per-view event undercard this is an absolute stinker...probably the worst PPV undercard ever seen. Apart from the Natasha Jonas fight there is nothing and no one (and the Jonas fight isnt all that either).

So why?........ is it -

Because Brook/Khan have drained all of the funds with their financial demands?

Because the Boxxer stable isnt strong enough to carry 2 big shows in a fortnight?

Because Ben Shalom isnt a big enough pull yet to stack a big PPV card (prob linked to the point above)?

Because the tickets sold out so quickly based on the main event that there is absolutely no need to stack the undercard?

Should the Williams/Eubank fight have been on the same card as Brook/Khan PPV?
It’s the worst PPV undercard I can remember. They’ve done because unfortunately the majority of people who’ll buy are casual fans and only care about the main event so those involved want to profit as much as they can from it.

The Eubank/Williams fight deserved its own card but it’s not like that was stacked either. They could have put Riakporhe in a decent fight or Marku or several others.

Eddie used to be criticised for some of his undercards and some of that was fair but Shalom doesn’t put himself out there as much to even be criticised about it.
JamesPhilips
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 6491
Joined: 19 Mar 2021, 06:43

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Post by JamesPhilips »

rhino222 wrote: 15 Feb 2022, 13:37 I thought this deserved a thread of its own despite there being a lengthy Khan/Brook one already.
We are alway quick to criticise the undercards Eddie Hearn dishes up but for a pay-per-view event undercard this is an absolute stinker...probably the worst PPV undercard ever seen. Apart from the Natasha Jonas fight there is nothing and no one (and the Jonas fight isnt all that either).

So why?........ is it -

Because Brook/Khan have drained all of the funds with their financial demands?

Because the Boxxer stable isnt strong enough to carry 2 big shows in a fortnight?

Because Ben Shalom isnt a big enough pull yet to stack a big PPV card (prob linked to the point above)?

Because the tickets sold out so quickly based on the main event that there is absolutely no need to stack the undercard?

Should the Williams/Eubank fight have :D :D been on the same card as Brook/Khan PPV?
I don’t know what you’re talking about! I’ll be buying it mainly for the historical Natasha Jonas fight and see if she can go up 25lbs, make history and win a world title against legend Chris Namus, who is one of the few females to have been knocked out in a round, and lost her last fight against star Ema Kozin who recently lost a close decision against global superstar glitter shedder Claressa Shileds, the Marvin Hagler of female boxing….. if you don’t love this fight you’re a hater, misogynist and cazzie.
rhino222
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6616
Joined: 09 Sep 2005, 09:38

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Post by rhino222 »

Frostieballs wrote: 15 Feb 2022, 13:45 It is simply good business.

A good undercard will not add anything in terms of ticket or PPV sales.

So why pay for it?
Of course its good business but I do disagree with your other comments.

Johnny Fisher sold 3-4000 tickets for his fight the other day, this would have made a massive difference, obviously in a bigger venue.

Another point is that if the main even falls (illness or injury) then the whole show is gone, and big expense to the promoter i should think. If there was another top fight on the PPV bill....... a williams/eubank..... or something of that ilk. Then the show would carry on.

With Covid 19 rife Ben Shalom took a massive gamble with a PPV bill based purely on one fight. It wont stand him in very good stead for the future as somewhere along the line this strategy will fall on its face.
thenamesnevers
Bantamweight
Posts: 89
Joined: 15 Feb 2022, 06:36

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Post by thenamesnevers »

Awful from Boxxer. They could have even put on another knockout tournament on the bill. Matchroom is streets ahead of Queensberry and Boxxer when it comes to cards.
Polidori
Bantamweight
Posts: 95
Joined: 14 Feb 2022, 05:16

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Post by Polidori »

I can't wait to see a chubby Natasha Jones fighting a one week sub for a 154lbs title :neutral:
JamesPhilips
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 6491
Joined: 19 Mar 2021, 06:43

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Post by JamesPhilips »

662081 wrote: 15 Feb 2022, 15:29 I can't wait to see a chubby Natasha Jones fighting a one week sub for a 154lbs title :neutral:
#realtalk #dreams #history
Polidori
Bantamweight
Posts: 95
Joined: 14 Feb 2022, 05:16

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Post by Polidori »

JamesPhilips wrote: 15 Feb 2022, 15:40
662081 wrote: 15 Feb 2022, 15:29 I can't wait to see a chubby Natasha Jones fighting a one week sub for a 154lbs title :neutral:
#realtalk #dreams #history
This is even more audacious than the main event fighters who both stepped up to challenge for the Middleweight title.
Frostieballs
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 2017
Joined: 15 Aug 2020, 17:38

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Post by Frostieballs »

rhino222 wrote: 15 Feb 2022, 13:58
Frostieballs wrote: 15 Feb 2022, 13:45 It is simply good business.

A good undercard will not add anything in terms of ticket or PPV sales.

So why pay for it?
Of course its good business but I do disagree with your other comments.

Johnny Fisher sold 3-4000 tickets for his fight the other day, this would have made a massive difference, obviously in a bigger venue.

Another point is that if the main even falls (illness or injury) then the whole show is gone, and big expense to the promoter i should think. If there was another top fight on the PPV bill....... a williams/eubank..... or something of that ilk. Then the show would carry on.

With Covid 19 rife Ben Shalom took a massive gamble with a PPV bill based purely on one fight. It wont stand him in very good stead for the future as somewhere along the line this strategy will fall on its face.
If they wanted another 4000 ticket sales, they didn’t need another fighter on the bill. They could have done that anyway - this sold out in record time.

They obviously made a call this venue was the best for the job and it wasn’t worth upscaling. A sold out arena is part of the PPV buzz.
KiwiRider
Super Lightweight
Posts: 26567
Joined: 11 Feb 2017, 22:25

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Post by KiwiRider »

Well I thought the main event would be crap, so having a crap undercard is par for the course isn't it?
Two past it fragile guys in a last ditch cash grab. You would be an absolute mug to buy this bullsh*t.
JamesPhilips
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 6491
Joined: 19 Mar 2021, 06:43

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Post by JamesPhilips »

KiwiRider wrote: 15 Feb 2022, 15:51 Well I thought the main event would be crap, so having a crap undercard is par for the course isn't it?
Two past it fragile guys in a last ditch cash grab. You would be an absolute mug to buy this bullsh*t.
Will you watch it? I mean through other means
rhino222
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6616
Joined: 09 Sep 2005, 09:38

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Post by rhino222 »

JamesPhilips wrote: 15 Feb 2022, 15:53
KiwiRider wrote: 15 Feb 2022, 15:51 Well I thought the main event would be crap, so having a crap undercard is par for the course isn't it?
Two past it fragile guys in a last ditch cash grab. You would be an absolute mug to buy this bullsh*t.
Will you watch it? I mean through other means
We all will.......for about 20 quid less than the PPV price.
Frostieballs
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 2017
Joined: 15 Aug 2020, 17:38

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Post by Frostieballs »

I will be paying for it.

It’s too late of course… but it’s a 50/50 fight, between two high profile fighters who have genuine needle.

They have seen better days, but are putting their reputations on the line.
KiwiRider
Super Lightweight
Posts: 26567
Joined: 11 Feb 2017, 22:25

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Post by KiwiRider »

JamesPhilips wrote: 15 Feb 2022, 15:53
KiwiRider wrote: 15 Feb 2022, 15:51 Well I thought the main event would be crap, so having a crap undercard is par for the course isn't it?
Two past it fragile guys in a last ditch cash grab. You would be an absolute mug to buy this bullsh*t.
Will you watch it? I mean through other means
Maybe the main event on youtube a few days later, and only if its good, which it will more than likely be sad. I don't steal.
JamesPhilips
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 6491
Joined: 19 Mar 2021, 06:43

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Post by JamesPhilips »

rhino222 wrote: 15 Feb 2022, 16:05
JamesPhilips wrote: 15 Feb 2022, 15:53
KiwiRider wrote: 15 Feb 2022, 15:51 Well I thought the main event would be crap, so having a crap undercard is par for the course isn't it?
Two past it fragile guys in a last ditch cash grab. You would be an absolute mug to buy this bullsh*t.
Will you watch it? I mean through other means
We all will.......for about 20 quid less than the PPV price.
I'm ashamed to see I'm gonna buy it. Cheaper than the pub
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23015
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Post by mickey1975 »

They certainly didn't need Johnny Fisher to sell tickets. They could have sold it a few times over.
CaptainSpacerod
Welterweight
Posts: 3329
Joined: 15 Dec 2015, 03:21

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Post by CaptainSpacerod »

rhino222 wrote: 15 Feb 2022, 16:05
JamesPhilips wrote: 15 Feb 2022, 15:53
KiwiRider wrote: 15 Feb 2022, 15:51 Well I thought the main event would be crap, so having a crap undercard is par for the course isn't it?
Two past it fragile guys in a last ditch cash grab. You would be an absolute mug to buy this bullsh*t.
Will you watch it? I mean through other means
We all will.......for about 20 quid less than the PPV price.
If you wanna watch a fight and I do wanna watch this one then you want to be able to relax and enjoy it without fear of the stream freezing or buffering 3 times a minute.

No doubt I’ll be moaning about the £20 when I’m listening to Adam smith insanely bigging up some irrelevant girls fight while I’m waiting for the main event but when Khan and Brook are eyeballing each other in the ring before the first bell I’ll be happy I paid it
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39309
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Post by margaret thatcher »

that women's title fight, jeezus....vacant title between a fighter who hasnt won in 3 years and one who fights 3 divisions below the weight :lol:
rd350lc
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4931
Joined: 22 Nov 2014, 11:49

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Post by rd350lc »

margaret thatcher wrote: 15 Feb 2022, 18:28 that women's title fight, jeezus....vacant title between a fighter who hasnt won in 3 years and one who fights 3 divisions below the weight :lol:
The casuals won't know any difference .
Polidori
Bantamweight
Posts: 95
Joined: 14 Feb 2022, 05:16

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Post by Polidori »

margaret thatcher wrote: 15 Feb 2022, 18:28 that women's title fight, jeezus....vacant title between a fighter who hasnt won in 3 years and one who fights 3 divisions below the weight :lol:
Hilarious isn't it, imagine if they pulled that stroke with a blokes fight ?

I can't wait to see Jonas at the weigh in, I bet her upper body will look much the same and any extra weight she's gained will be on her (already impressive) arse and thighs :-P
Twinkle Toes
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3339
Joined: 22 Sep 2003, 08:38

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Post by Twinkle Toes »

It is a terrible card in reality, even the main event which is at least 3 years too late.
Polidori
Bantamweight
Posts: 95
Joined: 14 Feb 2022, 05:16

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Post by Polidori »

Twinkle Toes wrote: 15 Feb 2022, 19:01 It is a terrible card in reality, even the main event which is at least 3 years too late.
Three .. that's being generous :o
rhino222
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6616
Joined: 09 Sep 2005, 09:38

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Post by rhino222 »

CaptainSpacerod wrote: 15 Feb 2022, 18:07
rhino222 wrote: 15 Feb 2022, 16:05
JamesPhilips wrote: 15 Feb 2022, 15:53

Will you watch it? I mean through other means
We all will.......for about 20 quid less than the PPV price.
If you wanna watch a fight and I do wanna watch this one then you want to be able to relax and enjoy it without fear of the stream freezing or buffering 3 times a minute.

No doubt I’ll be moaning about the £20 when I’m listening to Adam smith insanely bigging up some irrelevant girls fight while I’m waiting for the main event but when Khan and Brook are eyeballing each other in the ring before the first bell I’ll be happy I paid it
A decent IPTV provider doesnt buffer/lag. And its not illegal where i live.
KiwiRider
Super Lightweight
Posts: 26567
Joined: 11 Feb 2017, 22:25

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Post by KiwiRider »

Polidori wrote: 15 Feb 2022, 19:04
Twinkle Toes wrote: 15 Feb 2022, 19:01 It is a terrible card in reality, even the main event which is at least 3 years too late.
Three .. that's being generous :o
:OhYes: 5 is being kind, 7 is being truthful.
Post Reply