Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

peter barlow
Super Welterweight
Posts: 1397
Joined: 05 Aug 2014, 13:10

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Post by peter barlow »

Very interested in main event, undercard is very poor though so can't justify buying. Have an IPTV so will hope it stays up for main event.
gregregegg
Lightweight
Posts: 9161
Joined: 29 Sep 2017, 04:08

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Post by gregregegg »

Its been saved by the absolute killer they have put Fraser Clarke in with. True 50-50 that, someones getting chinned.
maverick23
Cruiserweight
Posts: 10375
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Post by maverick23 »

gregregegg wrote: 18 Feb 2022, 15:14 Its been saved by the absolute killer they have put Fraser Clarke in with. True 50-50 that, someones getting chinned.
Both undefeated. Someone’s 0 has to got to go!!
gregregegg
Lightweight
Posts: 9161
Joined: 29 Sep 2017, 04:08

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Post by gregregegg »

maverick23 wrote: 18 Feb 2022, 15:25
gregregegg wrote: 18 Feb 2022, 15:14 Its been saved by the absolute killer they have put Fraser Clarke in with. True 50-50 that, someones getting chinned.
Both undefeated. Someone’s 0 has to got to go!!
Gunna come down to heart really. Who wants it more?
maverick23
Cruiserweight
Posts: 10375
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Post by maverick23 »

gregregegg wrote: 18 Feb 2022, 15:26
maverick23 wrote: 18 Feb 2022, 15:25
gregregegg wrote: 18 Feb 2022, 15:14 Its been saved by the absolute killer they have put Fraser Clarke in with. True 50-50 that, someones getting chinned.
Both undefeated. Someone’s 0 has to got to go!!
Gunna come down to heart really. Who wants it more?
It’s the Olympic hero vs the multi sport young upstart. Darnell is the striker/keeper for Armfield FC. There’s talk that if he wins this one then he’ll have his next fight at Armfield stadium.
JamesPhilips
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 6490
Joined: 19 Mar 2021, 06:43

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Post by JamesPhilips »

Jonas vs Chamus has me salivating
maverick23
Cruiserweight
Posts: 10375
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Post by maverick23 »

JamesPhilips wrote: 18 Feb 2022, 16:25 Jonas vs Chamus has me salivating
And there’s the respect!
JamesPhilips
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 6490
Joined: 19 Mar 2021, 06:43

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Post by JamesPhilips »

maverick23 wrote: 18 Feb 2022, 16:58
JamesPhilips wrote: 18 Feb 2022, 16:25 Jonas vs Chamus has me salivating
And there’s the respect!
I'm fairly sure there will be a cacophony of noise too :TU:
milpool
Cruiserweight
Posts: 5402
Joined: 18 May 2011, 13:38

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Post by milpool »

Dioufy wrote: 17 Feb 2022, 04:43 Who is the ref? If it’s Howard Foster I’m done.
Victor Loughlin
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28417
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Post by Coco »

JamesPhilips wrote: 18 Feb 2022, 17:04
maverick23 wrote: 18 Feb 2022, 16:58
JamesPhilips wrote: 18 Feb 2022, 16:25 Jonas vs Chamus has me salivating
And there’s the respect!
I'm fairly sure there will be a cacophony of noise too :TU:
Smith has spoken out strongly today over homosexual slurs in the Khan v Brook presser
gregregegg
Lightweight
Posts: 9161
Joined: 29 Sep 2017, 04:08

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Post by gregregegg »

How the Fuk is natasha jonas fighting for a 154lb world title?

She has never beat a pulse, been in 2 world title fights and not won one and is arguably a 130lber... Yet now she gets a shot at the 154lb world championship vs someone thats weighted in at 147.25lb
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39309
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Post by margaret thatcher »

lol it's a joke even for a woman's title fight

chick moving up 3 divisions vs late replacement who hasnt won in 3 years and weighs 147. even for the 154 womens division im sure they couldve done better :lol:

adam smith will sure love it though, a battle for the ages! and jonas is a mom!
maverick23
Cruiserweight
Posts: 10375
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Post by maverick23 »

margaret thatcher wrote: 19 Feb 2022, 00:04 lol it's a joke even for a woman's title fight

chick moving up 3 divisions vs late replacement who hasnt won in 3 years and weighs 147. even for the 154 womens division im sure they couldve done better :lol:

adam smith will sure love it though, a battle for the ages! and jonas is a mom!
Yep and it’s a PPV co-main.

I don’t mind a well matched women’s fight but this one’s a bit of a joke on paper.
funso banjo baby
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4417
Joined: 23 Sep 2005, 11:05

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Post by funso banjo baby »

Fans are dumb

They should have turned off Khan v Prescott after Khan's team went ppv ditching itv

And so it goes....

Staggers me that fans paid for both Haye v Bellew fights

You get what you deserve in the end

I hope this main event is as damp as squib as possible
maverick23
Cruiserweight
Posts: 10375
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Post by maverick23 »

funso banjo baby wrote: 19 Feb 2022, 05:38 Fans are dumb

They should have turned off Khan v Prescott after Khan's team went ppv ditching itv

And so it goes....

Staggers me that fans paid for both Haye v Bellew fights

You get what you deserve in the end

I hope this main event is as damp as squib as possible
I didn’t buy Khan/Prescott as that was an awful main event for a PPV with an average undercard too.

I bought both Haye/Bellew PPVs as I was a fan of both and the undercards, particularly the rematch from memory, were decent.
Twinkle Toes
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3339
Joined: 22 Sep 2003, 08:38

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Post by Twinkle Toes »

That Clarke fight is embarrassing. They have dragged someone from off the street.

Jonas up 20lb in weight since the Harper fight and it's the co main feature.

People getting a semi on for how well SKY have promoted this card, for me it's disgusting how poor it is and rightly it needs pointing out.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23015
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Post by mickey1975 »

Twinkle Toes wrote: 19 Feb 2022, 06:12 That Clarke fight is embarrassing. They have dragged someone from off the street.

Jonas up 20lb in weight since the Harper fight and it's the co main feature.

People getting a semi on for how well SKY have promoted this card, for me it's disgusting how poor it is and rightly it needs pointing out.
He only got his license last week. He went to the public workout as a fan and asked his manager to try get him a ticket.
maverick23
Cruiserweight
Posts: 10375
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Post by maverick23 »

Twinkle Toes wrote: 19 Feb 2022, 06:12 That Clarke fight is embarrassing. They have dragged someone from off the street.

Jonas up 20lb in weight since the Harper fight and it's the co main feature.

People getting a semi on for how well SKY have promoted this card, for me it's disgusting how poor it is and rightly it needs pointing out.
They have hyped the main event extremely well and people are up for it.

The undercard is awful though which the majority have pointed out. In reality it won’t stop many people buying it though.
maverick23
Cruiserweight
Posts: 10375
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Post by maverick23 »

mickey1975 wrote: 19 Feb 2022, 06:16
Twinkle Toes wrote: 19 Feb 2022, 06:12 That Clarke fight is embarrassing. They have dragged someone from off the street.

Jonas up 20lb in weight since the Harper fight and it's the co main feature.

People getting a semi on for how well SKY have promoted this card, for me it's disgusting how poor it is and rightly it needs pointing out.
He only got his license last week. He went to the public workout as a fan and asked his manager to try get him a ticket.
They should have been looking to match him to how Joyce was matched early doors. He fought Lewiston on debut who was no great shakes but was area level and had just fought for the British.

If Darnell is as bad as he looked at the weigh in then it’ll do no one any favours.
jimmystone
Bantamweight
Posts: 1597
Joined: 01 Dec 2021, 07:31

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Post by jimmystone »

mickey1975 wrote: 19 Feb 2022, 06:16
Twinkle Toes wrote: 19 Feb 2022, 06:12 That Clarke fight is embarrassing. They have dragged someone from off the street.

Jonas up 20lb in weight since the Harper fight and it's the co main feature.

People getting a semi on for how well SKY have promoted this card, for me it's disgusting how poor it is and rightly it needs pointing out.
He only got his license last week. He went to the public workout as a fan and asked his manager to try get him a ticket.
The Clarke fight isn't as bad as it looks on paper but it'll still be over quick, or should be. Jake is a tough lad. He's fought Mark Potter amongst other people and has been on the unlicensed circuit for years. He's certainly more experienced than a lot of debutant's opponents. He'll try and make an impression but to no avail.
ThereByTheGrace
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4016
Joined: 04 Sep 2010, 05:22

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Post by ThereByTheGrace »

funso banjo baby wrote: 19 Feb 2022, 05:38 Fans are dumb

They should have turned off Khan v Prescott after Khan's team went ppv ditching itv

And so it goes....

Staggers me that fans paid for both Haye v Bellew fights

You get what you deserve in the end

I hope this main event is as damp as squib as possible
Fans are fans though! Each to their own. I won't pay for it but obviously someone is if they keep doing it!!!
maverick23
Cruiserweight
Posts: 10375
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Post by maverick23 »

589555 wrote: 19 Feb 2022, 06:28
mickey1975 wrote: 19 Feb 2022, 06:16
Twinkle Toes wrote: 19 Feb 2022, 06:12 That Clarke fight is embarrassing. They have dragged someone from off the street.

Jonas up 20lb in weight since the Harper fight and it's the co main feature.

People getting a semi on for how well SKY have promoted this card, for me it's disgusting how poor it is and rightly it needs pointing out.
He only got his license last week. He went to the public workout as a fan and asked his manager to try get him a ticket.
The Clarke fight isn't as bad as it looks on paper but it'll still be over quick, or should be. Jake is a tough lad. He's fought Mark Potter amongst other people and has been on the unlicensed circuit for years. He's certainly more experienced than a lot of debutant's opponents. He'll try and make an impression but to no avail.
It’s not good mate. A 44 year old Potter hammered him and stopped him with body shots. That was probably a fight that Jake had notice for too.
jimmystone
Bantamweight
Posts: 1597
Joined: 01 Dec 2021, 07:31

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Post by jimmystone »

maverick23 wrote: 19 Feb 2022, 06:36
589555 wrote: 19 Feb 2022, 06:28
mickey1975 wrote: 19 Feb 2022, 06:16
He only got his license last week. He went to the public workout as a fan and asked his manager to try get him a ticket.
The Clarke fight isn't as bad as it looks on paper but it'll still be over quick, or should be. Jake is a tough lad. He's fought Mark Potter amongst other people and has been on the unlicensed circuit for years. He's certainly more experienced than a lot of debutant's opponents. He'll try and make an impression but to no avail.
It’s not good mate. A 44 year old Potter hammered him and stopped him with body shots. That was probably a fight that Jake had notice for too.
I agree it's certainly not good! My point it he's not a rank first timer, It could be worse and it shouldn't be live on PPV. Highlights of the stoppage maybe.
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39309
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Post by margaret thatcher »

clarke should be debuting vs someone like mark bennet at least.................guy is 30, had a sh!tload of am experience, and in the wsb already beat guys like vladislav sirenko (stoppage), vianello, etc
maverick23
Cruiserweight
Posts: 10375
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20

Re: Absolute stinker - The Khan/Brook undercard

Post by maverick23 »

margaret thatcher wrote: 19 Feb 2022, 06:45 clarke should be debuting vs someone like mark bennet at least.................guy is 30, had a sh!tload of am experience, and in the wsb already beat guys like vladislav sirenko (stoppage), vianello, etc
Yep. Turning pro at 30 every fight needs to count.
Post Reply