George Foreman: Best win?

gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46569
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: George Foreman: Best win?

Post by gilgamesh »

margaret thatcher wrote: 02 Mar 2022, 02:22 holyfield lost to every good opponent he faced in his 40s, in several cases hardly winning a round, many of his opponents during this time were already in their 40s themselves
Had he hit his 40's by the time he fought Rahman? I don't remember.

That seemed like it was his last big win.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46569
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: George Foreman: Best win?

Post by gilgamesh »

Oh and as for Foreman's best win. I mean, it's a no brainer. It's Joe Frazier.
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39269
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: George Foreman: Best win?

Post by margaret thatcher »

he was still in his 30s

obviously he was great in his prime, but in his 40s he was hardly showing up the younger generation. his fights vs byrd, toney, and ibgraimov are sad to watch if anything. same goes for sherman williams rocking him around, it was good that fight was called early on a cut
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39269
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: George Foreman: Best win?

Post by margaret thatcher »

i forgot he got schooled by larry donald too, was another sad to watch affair

donald won a shutout over holy, yet couldnt beat ray austin in his next fight
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 101779
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: George Foreman: Best win?

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

p4p1 wrote: 01 Mar 2022, 23:27 Is Foreman's success in the late 80's and early 90s proof that the quality of boxers declined from the 70s? He didn't beat everyone nor did he fight everyone but he was one of the top guys around. I'm not so sure that version of him would be in the 70s though.
Does this then show how much it declined into the 2000s with how successful and competitive Holyfield was able to be into his 40s?
He was fighting once a month wasn’t he..
Which I guess he needed, but then had a meaningful fight once a while too.. climb the rankings.
Riddick Bowie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 947
Joined: 19 Jul 2003, 07:25

Re: George Foreman: Best win?

Post by Riddick Bowie »

gilgamesh wrote: 02 Mar 2022, 02:29
margaret thatcher wrote: 02 Mar 2022, 02:22 holyfield lost to every good opponent he faced in his 40s, in several cases hardly winning a round, many of his opponents during this time were already in their 40s themselves
Had he hit his 40's by the time he fought Rahman? I don't remember.

That seemed like it was his last big win.
3 months short of turning 40 when he beat Rahman
Riddick Bowie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 947
Joined: 19 Jul 2003, 07:25

Re: George Foreman: Best win?

Post by Riddick Bowie »

bjornborgbook wrote: 01 Mar 2022, 18:41 The Moorer fight looked suspect. The sudden drop like he got shot and the whole reaction after looked contrived. Also the fact that Moorer did not demand an immediate rematch and was later rewarded with another IBF shot. No disrespect to Foreman, he was a big moneymaker and Moorer was a boring dud as champ. Wouldn't be shocked if Moorer sold the belts and got a percentage of future Foreman title fights like the Louis-Braddock arrangement.
The problem with believing Moorer took a dive is trying to explain why he tried to take Foreman's head off the first nine rounds.
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39269
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: George Foreman: Best win?

Post by margaret thatcher »

on replay you see how cleanly it lands on the point of the chin and swivels moorer's head. it did look a weird ko live and like the shot had little behind it, but it's a much better punch than it appears initially in real time. keep in mind youre also dealing with an atg puncher vs a softer chinned guy. legit ko.

moorer got ko'd in a similar way vs tua, in a fight he'd have no reason to throw, so i think it's just the way he reacts to things
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: George Foreman: Best win?

Post by Counter-puncher »

Billy Tully wrote: 02 Mar 2022, 04:56
bjornborgbook wrote: 01 Mar 2022, 18:41 The Moorer fight looked suspect. The sudden drop like he got shot and the whole reaction after looked contrived. Also the fact that Moorer did not demand an immediate rematch and was later rewarded with another IBF shot. No disrespect to Foreman, he was a big moneymaker and Moorer was a boring dud as champ. Wouldn't be shocked if Moorer sold the belts and got a percentage of future Foreman title fights like the Louis-Braddock arrangement.
The problem with believing Moorer took a dive is trying to explain why he tried to take Foreman's head off the first nine rounds.
This guy's a sad-sack fantasist, for god's sake don't treat his sh1t like it's worth replying to
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 101779
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: George Foreman: Best win?

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

Billy Tully wrote: 02 Mar 2022, 04:56
bjornborgbook wrote: 01 Mar 2022, 18:41 The Moorer fight looked suspect. The sudden drop like he got shot and the whole reaction after looked contrived. Also the fact that Moorer did not demand an immediate rematch and was later rewarded with another IBF shot. No disrespect to Foreman, he was a big moneymaker and Moorer was a boring dud as champ. Wouldn't be shocked if Moorer sold the belts and got a percentage of future Foreman title fights like the Louis-Braddock arrangement.
The problem with believing Moorer took a dive is trying to explain why he tried to take Foreman's head off the first nine rounds.
I believe Moorer was ahead too
bjornborgbook
Bantamweight
Posts: 223
Joined: 29 Jan 2022, 19:21

Re: George Foreman: Best win?

Post by bjornborgbook »

p4p1 wrote: 01 Mar 2022, 23:24
bjornborgbook wrote: 01 Mar 2022, 18:37 The first seven rounds of the Ali fight. ) or Lyle fight.
Foreman was down on all scorecards heading into the 8th.
how is that possible, Foreman threw and landed most of the punches.
bjornborgbook
Bantamweight
Posts: 223
Joined: 29 Jan 2022, 19:21

Re: George Foreman: Best win?

Post by bjornborgbook »

Billy Tully wrote: 02 Mar 2022, 04:56
bjornborgbook wrote: 01 Mar 2022, 18:41 The Moorer fight looked suspect. The sudden drop like he got shot and the whole reaction after looked contrived. Also the fact that Moorer did not demand an immediate rematch and was later rewarded with another IBF shot. No disrespect to Foreman, he was a big moneymaker and Moorer was a boring dud as champ. Wouldn't be shocked if Moorer sold the belts and got a percentage of future Foreman title fights like the Louis-Braddock arrangement.
The problem with believing Moorer took a dive is trying to explain why he tried to take Foreman's head off the first nine rounds.
Looked like pushed punches, like AJ vs Usyk. Why didn't Moorer demand immediate rematch?
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 101779
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: George Foreman: Best win?

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

bjornborgbook wrote: 02 Mar 2022, 08:51
p4p1 wrote: 01 Mar 2022, 23:24
bjornborgbook wrote: 01 Mar 2022, 18:37 The first seven rounds of the Ali fight. ) or Lyle fight.
Foreman was down on all scorecards heading into the 8th.
how is that possible, Foreman threw and landed most of the punches.
Facts!

Zach Clayton 68-66 | Nourridine Adalla 70-67 | James Taylor 69-66

Scorecards in rounds: Zach Clayton 4-2-1 Ali, Nourridine Adalla 3-0-4 Ali, and James Taylor 4-1-2 Ali
bjornborgbook
Bantamweight
Posts: 223
Joined: 29 Jan 2022, 19:21

Re: George Foreman: Best win?

Post by bjornborgbook »

Ruthless-RKO wrote: 02 Mar 2022, 08:55
bjornborgbook wrote: 02 Mar 2022, 08:51
p4p1 wrote: 01 Mar 2022, 23:24

Foreman was down on all scorecards heading into the 8th.
how is that possible, Foreman threw and landed most of the punches.
Facts!

Zach Clayton 68-66 | Nourridine Adalla 70-67 | James Taylor 69-66

Scorecards in rounds: Zach Clayton 4-2-1 Ali, Nourridine Adalla 3-0-4 Ali, and James Taylor 4-1-2 Ali
Have to watch it again for the 20th time. Looked like Foreman was scoring more and Ali was giving away rounds sitting on the ropes. Maybe it was rigged for Ali :0
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 101779
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: George Foreman: Best win?

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

bjornborgbook wrote: 02 Mar 2022, 09:00
Ruthless-RKO wrote: 02 Mar 2022, 08:55
bjornborgbook wrote: 02 Mar 2022, 08:51

how is that possible, Foreman threw and landed most of the punches.
Facts!

Zach Clayton 68-66 | Nourridine Adalla 70-67 | James Taylor 69-66

Scorecards in rounds: Zach Clayton 4-2-1 Ali, Nourridine Adalla 3-0-4 Ali, and James Taylor 4-1-2 Ali
Have to watch it again for the 20th time. Looked like Foreman was scoring more and Ali was giving away rounds sitting on the ropes. Maybe it was rigged for Ali :0
good thing the judges weren't needed then..
Ambling Alp II
Super Middleweight
Posts: 15185
Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31

Re: George Foreman: Best win?

Post by Ambling Alp II »

The fight was about even after 7 rounds. Some close rounds with good action. Something like 67-66 either way is reasonable.
Ambling Alp II
Super Middleweight
Posts: 15185
Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31

Re: George Foreman: Best win?

Post by Ambling Alp II »

p4p1 wrote: 01 Mar 2022, 23:27 Is Foreman's success in the late 80's and early 90s proof that the quality of boxers declined from the 70s? He didn't beat everyone nor did he fight everyone but he was one of the top guys around. I'm not so sure that version of him would be in the 70s though.
Does this then show how much it declined into the 2000s with how successful and competitive Holyfield was able to be into his 40s?
It's not the end all be all, but it is a strong indication that the division was not as good in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Foreman was clearly way past his best yet had a lot of success. Larry Holmes as well. Even Joe Bugner had some surprising wins in the late 1980s.

The heavyweight division was pretty good in the early 1990s. It just wasn't as good as the 1970s.

Holyfield was 39 when he beat Rahman. He obviously was past his best and continued to slide as he got older. He was actually 46 when he hosed against Valuev. Klitschko continued to be the best when he was in his mid-late 30s; yet another indication of how the heavyweight division has been.

Again, one way past it doing so well is not the all be all. But it's a strong indication.
Riddick Bowie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 947
Joined: 19 Jul 2003, 07:25

Re: George Foreman: Best win?

Post by Riddick Bowie »

bjornborgbook wrote: 02 Mar 2022, 08:54
Billy Tully wrote: 02 Mar 2022, 04:56
bjornborgbook wrote: 01 Mar 2022, 18:41 The Moorer fight looked suspect. The sudden drop like he got shot and the whole reaction after looked contrived. Also the fact that Moorer did not demand an immediate rematch and was later rewarded with another IBF shot. No disrespect to Foreman, he was a big moneymaker and Moorer was a boring dud as champ. Wouldn't be shocked if Moorer sold the belts and got a percentage of future Foreman title fights like the Louis-Braddock arrangement.
The problem with believing Moorer took a dive is trying to explain why he tried to take Foreman's head off the first nine rounds.
Looked like pushed punches, like AJ vs Usyk. Why didn't Moorer demand immediate rematch?
Judging by the soft choice of comeback opponent Team Moorer didn't fancy it. He did sign for a rematch with Foreman in 1996 but it fell through.

"Pushed punches"? Either you've never seen the first nine rounds or you're an idiot.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46569
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: George Foreman: Best win?

Post by gilgamesh »

bjornborgbook wrote: 02 Mar 2022, 08:54
Billy Tully wrote: 02 Mar 2022, 04:56
bjornborgbook wrote: 01 Mar 2022, 18:41 The Moorer fight looked suspect. The sudden drop like he got shot and the whole reaction after looked contrived. Also the fact that Moorer did not demand an immediate rematch and was later rewarded with another IBF shot. No disrespect to Foreman, he was a big moneymaker and Moorer was a boring dud as champ. Wouldn't be shocked if Moorer sold the belts and got a percentage of future Foreman title fights like the Louis-Braddock arrangement.
The problem with believing Moorer took a dive is trying to explain why he tried to take Foreman's head off the first nine rounds.
Looked like pushed punches, like AJ vs Usyk. Why didn't Moorer demand immediate rematch?
He could've asked for one. I doubt he would've gotten one.
bjornborgbook
Bantamweight
Posts: 223
Joined: 29 Jan 2022, 19:21

Re: George Foreman: Best win?

Post by bjornborgbook »

gilgamesh wrote: 02 Mar 2022, 13:20
bjornborgbook wrote: 02 Mar 2022, 08:54
Billy Tully wrote: 02 Mar 2022, 04:56

The problem with believing Moorer took a dive is trying to explain why he tried to take Foreman's head off the first nine rounds.
Looked like pushed punches, like AJ vs Usyk. Why didn't Moorer demand immediate rematch?
He could've asked for one. I doubt he would've gotten one.
What kind of champion loses the title to a 45 year old and then does not demand an immediate rematch? I'd suggest one that sold the belt for the establishment.
bjornborgbook
Bantamweight
Posts: 223
Joined: 29 Jan 2022, 19:21

Re: George Foreman: Best win?

Post by bjornborgbook »

Ambling Alp II wrote: 02 Mar 2022, 11:32
p4p1 wrote: 01 Mar 2022, 23:27 Is Foreman's success in the late 80's and early 90s proof that the quality of boxers declined from the 70s? He didn't beat everyone nor did he fight everyone but he was one of the top guys around. I'm not so sure that version of him would be in the 70s though.
Does this then show how much it declined into the 2000s with how successful and competitive Holyfield was able to be into his 40s?
It's not the end all be all, but it is a strong indication that the division was not as good in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Foreman was clearly way past his best yet had a lot of success. Larry Holmes as well. Even Joe Bugner had some surprising wins in the late 1980s.

The heavyweight division was pretty good in the early 1990s. It just wasn't as good as the 1970s.

Holyfield was 39 when he beat Rahman. He obviously was past his best and continued to slide as he got older. He was actually 46 when he hosed against Valuev. Klitschko continued to be the best when he was in his mid-late 30s; yet another indication of how the heavyweight division has been.

Again, one way past it doing so well is not the all be all. But it's a strong indication.
The heavyweight division was only mediocre in the early 90s. Tyson was in a prison. Holy and Bowe were only good sellers they did not transcend the sport. Lennox was being frozen out by the establishment. Moorer had no selling power or charisma. I think Holyfield sold the belt to Moorer (fake heart problems was the alibi) to set up Foreman to KO Moorer (Holy vs Foreman 2 was a tough sell). Foreman redux came along at the right time, the establishment needed a star. So they manufacted Big George and milked him as long as they could. Tyson redux after jail was protected by King/showtime/mgmgrand. The Arum HBO side of the establishment needed a star to compete with Tyson and it was Foreman. My theory. Feel free to reject )
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46569
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: George Foreman: Best win?

Post by gilgamesh »

bjornborgbook wrote: 02 Mar 2022, 13:47
gilgamesh wrote: 02 Mar 2022, 13:20
bjornborgbook wrote: 02 Mar 2022, 08:54
Looked like pushed punches, like AJ vs Usyk. Why didn't Moorer demand immediate rematch?
He could've asked for one. I doubt he would've gotten one.
What kind of champion loses the title to a 45 year old and then does not demand an immediate rematch? I'd suggest one that sold the belt for the establishment.
Unless you got a Rematch clause in the contract you can demand all you want, it don't mean you're gonna f*cking get it.

There obviously wasn't a rematch clause in the contract, and Foreman who won with a great shot after taking 9 rounds of an ass kicking, wasn't eager to get beat the f*ck up again while hoping for a perfect shot I'm sure.

Moorer wouldn't have hesitated for the rematch, but it wasn't up to him.
bjornborgbook
Bantamweight
Posts: 223
Joined: 29 Jan 2022, 19:21

Re: George Foreman: Best win?

Post by bjornborgbook »

gilgamesh wrote: 02 Mar 2022, 13:59
bjornborgbook wrote: 02 Mar 2022, 13:47
gilgamesh wrote: 02 Mar 2022, 13:20

He could've asked for one. I doubt he would've gotten one.
What kind of champion loses the title to a 45 year old and then does not demand an immediate rematch? I'd suggest one that sold the belt for the establishment.
Unless you got a Rematch clause in the contract you can demand all you want, it don't mean you're gonna f*cking get it.

There obviously wasn't a rematch clause in the contract, and Foreman who won with a great shot after taking 9 rounds of an ass kicking, wasn't eager to get beat the f*ck up again while hoping for a perfect shot I'm sure.

Moorer wouldn't have hesitated for the rematch, but it wasn't up to him.
It appears he didn't want the rematch to avenge the terrible loss because he sold the belts to the establishment. A real champion who loses his title, the first thing he wants is revenge redemption to regain his value and leverage. To not want that smells of corruption, it's just not how a true champion acts.

Bowe wanted the Holy rematch. Ali wanted the Frazier rematch. Frazier wanted the Foreman rematch. Holmes wanted the Spinks rematch. Wladimir wanted the Fury rematch. Because those were real fights. Hagler and Leonard didn't want the Leonard rematches - those fights were suspect.

Moorer was satisfied to get knocked out (or dive) for a 45 year old??? Cmon bro, you've got to be effing kidding.
Riddick Bowie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 947
Joined: 19 Jul 2003, 07:25

Re: George Foreman: Best win?

Post by Riddick Bowie »

Looks like Boxers of the Past has a new forum buffoon.
Ambling Alp II
Super Middleweight
Posts: 15185
Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31

Re: George Foreman: Best win?

Post by Ambling Alp II »

Just what we needed. :D
Post Reply