my top 10 most underated fighters of all time
-
BrocktonBlockbuster49
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4900
- Joined: 29 May 2005, 00:32
my top 10 most underated fighters of all time
heres my preliminary unfinished list
1. Lloyd marshall
2. Jack Blackburn
3. Harold Johnson
4. Lee Q Murray
5. Fritzie Zivic
6. Clarence Henry
7. Billy Conn
8. Joe Walcott "barbodos"
9. John Henry Lewis
10. Sonny Liston
HM: Mauro Mina, Jerry Quarry, Dave Holly, Cocoa Kid
i will soon be making a top 25 list
1. Lloyd marshall
2. Jack Blackburn
3. Harold Johnson
4. Lee Q Murray
5. Fritzie Zivic
6. Clarence Henry
7. Billy Conn
8. Joe Walcott "barbodos"
9. John Henry Lewis
10. Sonny Liston
HM: Mauro Mina, Jerry Quarry, Dave Holly, Cocoa Kid
i will soon be making a top 25 list
Last edited by BrocktonBlockbuster49 on 02 Aug 2006, 14:40, edited 1 time in total.
-
pundit
- Heavyweight

Re: my top 10 most underated fighters of all time
Why do I have the weird feeling that Gene Tunney won't be on that one either....BrocktonBlockbuster49 wrote:
i will soon be making a top 25 list
Re: my top 10 most underated fighters of all time
I swore it said underrated not overrated.pundit wrote:Why do I have the weird feeling that Gene Tunney won't be on that one either....BrocktonBlockbuster49 wrote:
i will soon be making a top 25 list![]()
-
The Great John L
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4351
- Joined: 26 Jul 2005, 19:37
Re: my top 10 most underated fighters of all time
Sonny Liston? Most posters on here have him as an all-time top 10 HW, some as high as top 3!BrocktonBlockbuster49 wrote:heres my preliminary unfinished list
…10. Sonny Liston
Not sure how he’s under-rated...
-
BrocktonBlockbuster49
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4900
- Joined: 29 May 2005, 00:32
Re: my top 10 most underated fighters of all time
The Great John L wrote:Sonny Liston? Most posters on here have him as an all-time top 10 HW, some as high as top 3!BrocktonBlockbuster49 wrote:heres my preliminary unfinished list
…10. Sonny Liston![]()
Not sure how he’s under-rated...
most place him in bottom half of top ten or outside of there top 10 which i feel is underating him. hes top 5 material IMO.
in fantasy matchups people also unfairly critisize his heart, stamina and chin
-
The Great John L
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4351
- Joined: 26 Jul 2005, 19:37
Re: my top 10 most underated fighters of all time
Hard to imagine how any HW who is ranked by MOST in thier all time top and whose name isn't Ali or Louis can be under rated. Kind deminishes the meaning of under rated, don't ya think?BrocktonBlockbuster49 wrote:most place him in bottom half of top ten or outside of there top 10 which i feel is underating him. hes top 5 material IMO.
in fantasy matchups people also unfairly critisize his heart, stamina and chin
How about Jeffires? Most don't even rank him top 10 anymore yet he beat Corbett, Fitz and Tom Sharkey. A short resume, but sounds a bit better than Liston's. At least to me.
-
HomicideHenry
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 18722
- Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43
-
BrocktonBlockbuster49
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4900
- Joined: 29 May 2005, 00:32
-
BrocktonBlockbuster49
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4900
- Joined: 29 May 2005, 00:32
-
Ambling Alp
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 3627
- Joined: 15 Jul 2005, 22:31
You have a point there. Who are they underrated by? Is it just by people on the BoxRec Forum or just in general or who.Seamus wrote:The biggest problem here is, how do you accurately define underrated ? The criteria I prefer is, who isn't in the Hall of Fame. Just food for thought.
For example, someone like Lloyd Marshall is underrated in general, but most people on this forum seem to think highly of him.
I dont know about that. I think Montgomery is usually placed right were he belongs, highly regarded but not amoung the divisions all time elite.I have always thought that Bob Montgomery deserves a bit more recognition.
he had some very good wins, but there were ALOT of losses. And not only against fellow hall of famers.
A fighter like Lamotta is often critizied for his losses to middle of the road fighters,but Mongomery would surely get a pass by alot of those same critics.
In fact Lamotta is underrated these days if you ask me, especially on these boards. from 1943 through 1946 Lamotta fought 41 times and only lost 5 times, 3 times to Robinson(one of those three may have been a gift) once too Marshell(very close fight, some thought Lamotta won) and once to the tricky and dirty Zivic.
in that time period he defeated Zivic 3 times, Robinson once, and a host of top ten contenders.
In later years his battle with the scales made his preformances more erratic. Even in his win against Cerdan, (a legitamate win that often gets downplayed by his critics)I believe Lamotta was already on the downslide
of his career.
-
BrocktonBlockbuster49
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4900
- Joined: 29 May 2005, 00:32
great post theone i agree
lloyd marshall was special, hes a top 10 middleweight of all time in my book. he might be the greatest super middle of all time as well.
the only film of him is when he was past his prime. but if u watch him in some films like vs charles in 1946, he has incredible all around athletic abilitiy, archie moore like movement and all around punching skills.
lloyd marshall was special, hes a top 10 middleweight of all time in my book. he might be the greatest super middle of all time as well.
the only film of him is when he was past his prime. but if u watch him in some films like vs charles in 1946, he has incredible all around athletic abilitiy, archie moore like movement and all around punching skills.
I rate Marshall highly but to rate him in the all time middleweight top ten is misguided I think, ...in a division which has the history of so many great champions and contenders.... Marshall is top 15 or 20... no way is he top 10...BrocktonBlockbuster49 wrote:great post theone i agree
lloyd marshall was special, hes a top 10 middleweight of all time in my book. he might be the greatest super middle of all time as well.
the only film of him is when he was past his prime. but if u watch him in some films like vs charles in 1946, he has incredible all around athletic abilitiy, archie moore like movement and all around punching skills.
Re: my top 10 most underated fighters of all time
I agree with these picks except maybe Conn who does get recognition I think. He was a great IMO.BrocktonBlockbuster49 wrote:heres my preliminary unfinished list
1. Lloyd marshall
2. Jack Blackburn
3. Harold Johnson
4. Lee Q Murray
5. Fritzie Zivic
6. Clarence Henry
7. Billy Conn
8. Joe Walcott "barbodos"
9. John Henry Lewis
10. Sonny Liston
HM: Mauro Mina, Jerry Quarry, Dave Holly, Cocoa Kid
i will soon be making a top 25 list
Some others off the top of my head no particular order.
Gorilla Jones
Freddie Cochrane
Billy Graham
Young Corbett II
Johnny Wilson
Bob Montgomery
Vincente Saldivar
Ismael Laguna
Ken Overlin
Rinty Monaghan
Joe Lynch
Hogan Kid Bassey
George Dixon
-
BrocktonBlockbuster49
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4900
- Joined: 29 May 2005, 00:32
why not??silkov wrote:I rate Marshall highly but to rate him in the all time middleweight top ten is misguided I think, ...in a division which has the history of so many great champions and contenders.... Marshall is top 15 or 20... no way is he top 10...BrocktonBlockbuster49 wrote:great post theone i agree
lloyd marshall was special, hes a top 10 middleweight of all time in my book. he might be the greatest super middle of all time as well.
the only film of him is when he was past his prime. but if u watch him in some films like vs charles in 1946, he has incredible all around athletic abilitiy, archie moore like movement and all around punching skills.
isnt tony zale in ur top 10? the same zale who never fought black fighters despite there being an incredible list of great colored 160lbers out there. the same zale whos best wins are over rocky graziano and georgie abrams?
marshall beat much better competition than tony zale.....
lloyd marshall beat middleweights
ezzard charles
charley burley
jake lamotta
holman williams
jack chase
lou broullaird
teddy yarosz
ken overlin
eddie babe risko
shorty hogue
bandit romero
ENOUGH SAID!!
-
pound per pound
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1602
- Joined: 13 Jan 2005, 14:36
well done
Well done.silkov wrote:My top ten of underrated fighters would go something like this...
1. Manuel Ortiz
2. Gene Tunney
3. Jim Jeffries
4. Larry Holmes
5. Joe Brown
6. Harold Johnson
7. Al Brown
8. Miguel Canto
9. Euesbio Pedrosa
10. Bob Fitzsimmons
![]()
![]()
he was also beaten by the same romeroBrocktonBlockbuster49 wrote:why not??silkov wrote:I rate Marshall highly but to rate him in the all time middleweight top ten is misguided I think, ...in a division which has the history of so many great champions and contenders.... Marshall is top 15 or 20... no way is he top 10...BrocktonBlockbuster49 wrote:great post theone i agree
lloyd marshall was special, hes a top 10 middleweight of all time in my book. he might be the greatest super middle of all time as well.
the only film of him is when he was past his prime. but if u watch him in some films like vs charles in 1946, he has incredible all around athletic abilitiy, archie moore like movement and all around punching skills.
isnt tony zale in ur top 10? the same zale who never fought black fighters despite there being an incredible list of great colored 160lbers out there. the same zale whos best wins are over rocky graziano and georgie abrams?
marshall beat much better competition than tony zale.....
lloyd marshall beat middleweights
ezzard charles
charley burley
jake lamotta
holman williams
jack chase
lou broullaird
teddy yarosz
ken overlin
eddie babe risko
shorty hogue
bandit romero
ENOUGH SAID!!
yarosz
hogue
chase
williams
add booker and ceferino garcia and i don't think you have a top 10 middle.what makes marshall any better than the likes of chase and booker?