He was once wrongly considered one of the best fighters in the world. The rest of it was just his network trying to make a new Floyd out of rags and scraps.Enlightened-One wrote: ↑14 Mar 2022, 13:54Broner's resume for the first 5½ years of his career (before his 24th birthday) was truly impressive, his critics only seem to recall what's transpired since 2015, when his in-ring talents were declining.thereverend wrote: ↑13 Mar 2022, 06:22I get tired of hearing 'what a waste of talent he was'. 'If he'd only take boxing seriously he could be great'. The truth is he wasn't that good to begin with and at 32 he's a washed up has-been.
He's not an example of wasted talent, he's an example of an overrated media hype job.
Adrien Broner was once classed amongst the top-six of The RING's pound-for-pound ratings, he's engaged in ten world championship bouts, faced ten world champions and also captured world titles in four weight divisions.
Even if you severely dislike the guy, and I’m not his biggest fan either, it’s impossible to deny that he was once considered one of the best fighters on the planet.
Like him or loathe him, there’s not a lot of fighters competing today with Broner’s resume.
I cant even bother checking his record to remind myself who his ‘best’ win was over those 4 weights he apparently won at. Ooh didn’t he beat Gavin Rees? I can’t remember another win, total blank.
Who knows maybe there was a really good win in there that I missed. As far as I was concerned he lost the moment he faced someone any good and not undersized by a weight class. Then carried on losing
You know that discussion you had about padded records? Well if he truly had world titles at 4 weights, that right there is some padding.

