Pernell Whitaker vs. Alexis Arguello

[Vlad]

135.IMO Whitaker by UD,what your picks?

[goose 5]

Pernell on points. Too slick for Arguello.

[Cutman Scabbers]

Pernell on points. Too slick for Arguello.

Ummm... just a minute please.

At 140, too physical and too durable -- Aaron Pryor showed that.

But at 135, is anyone too slick for Arguello?
Maybe Arguello is too technically sound & experienced for Whitaker.

The Thin Man is one of the few I could see taking Sweet Pea.

[DrDuke]

Arguello had problems with elusive boxers not once, while Whitaker was a one of the greatest in the business. Whitaker by UD.

[Cutman Scabbers]

Arguello had problems with elusive boxers not once, while Whitaker was a one of the greatest in the business. Whitaker by UD.

Which elusive boxers did Arguello have problems with? Or are you saying he didn't?

[DrDuke]

Arguello had problems with elusive boxers not once, while Whitaker was a one of the greatest in the business. Whitaker by UD.

Which elusive boxers did Arguello have problems with? Or are you saying he didn't?

I'm saying he did. Against Ernesto Marcel and Vilomar Fernandez in both fights with the least.

[Cutman Scabbers]

Arguello had problems with elusive boxers not once, while Whitaker was a one of the greatest in the business. Whitaker by UD.

Which elusive boxers did Arguello have problems with? Or are you saying he didn't?

I'm saying he did. Against Ernesto Marcel and Vilomar Fernandez in both fights with the least.

Thank you

[Nile4000]

Pernell would not want to be caught by Alexis, so he does enough to stay ahead to take a close UD.

[985802]

alexsis was a modern louis he had more advances but he still moves to slow for pernell

which shows the change In advances and years its obvious pernell wins everytime