who is the 3rd best guy fury has beaten?

[margaret thatcher]

ive seen some mixed opinion on it, so wondering what people thinnk:

whyte, chisora, or wallin?

obviously wlad and wilder are the top 2

[TheLeprechaun]

Wallin. Clearly.

Chisora(2) and Whyte were both mismatches. Wallin gave a much better account of himself and is unbeaten outside of that fight.

[mickey1975]

Wallin. Clearly.

Chisora(2) and Whyte were both mismatches. Wallin gave a much better account of himself and is unbeaten outside of that fight.

And Whyte ran from for reasons that became obvious.

[gregregegg]

People on here love Wallin.

I mean, mabey its true.... but If wallin is better than whyte and chisora then he has had the most disappointing carrer ever. Best win breazeal, 2nd best win, a friendly decison over soko?

id go, chis, whyte, wallin. or whyte, chis, wallin. cant decide but however i have it wallin is the bottom of em for me.

[margaret thatcher]

wallin vs whyte could still be a good one

[gregregegg]

wallin vs whyte could still be a good one

I want wallin vs Chisora. Chissora even at 40 is such a good yard stick. But he says he hates southpaws.

Eddies talking like he has a fight for chis in july. i think he beats otto still so id like that. im supprised ed has a chis fight, i assumed chis would jump ship to sky ppv...

[Twinkle Toes]

It's like Wallin's last fight doesn't exist. He was terrible.

[handsofstone]

Whyte or Cunningham, Whyte maybe just edges it for his wins at Heavyweight

[HomicideHenry]

I will still go with Dillian Whyte.

Maybe he picked the wrong game plan. Maybe he just wasn't feeling it. Maybe it simply was not his night because Fury has actually peaked as a heavyweight. But I cannot call Wallin the third best because a one-eyed Fury literally won every single round against the Swede.

The man will forever go down in the history books as being lucky he got Fury cut. Other than that he was never in the fight with Fury. But people want to make it bigger than what it was because of all the blood.

No, Whyte had the best credentials and had been the number one contender for 3 years. However on the basis of that performance I have little doubt that Wilder probably would have beaten Whyte.

Jesus Christ Almighty God bless you all

[margaret thatcher]

fury defo didnt win every round against wallin, i mean in round 12 for example he got smacked around , hurt, and had to hold the ropes, no way you could give him that round. all 3 judges + 100 percent of people on eyeonthering (57 cards) gave it to wallin https://eyeonthering.com/boxing/tyson-f ... tto-wallin

aside from that, makes sense,

[HomicideHenry]

fury didnt win every round against wallin

The scores were pretty wide, lol.

118-110, 117-111, 116-112

Twelve rounds, I think all you could really give the Swedish heavyweight was three or four rounds out of the contest. Regardless the man was brought in as an opponent, Fury did not take the man seriously, and Fury won a unanimous decision with one eye.

I don't think a cut should automatically elevate a man to being one of the top three best opponents in a man's career. But of course we agree to disagree. What I think is a more interesting question is who is number four or five, and I would probably say Chisora and Cunningham.

Jesus Christ Almighty God bless you all

[margaret thatcher]

ya, and you'll notice that not one of those scores was 12-0

i never said wallin was top 3 either, not sure you read my post right

[Riddick Bowie]

And Fury is justifying retirement by saying 'there's nothing else I can do.'

A 40 yr old Klitschko, Wilder, and a third best opponent of either Chisora, Whyte or Wallin. What reality does this man inhabit?

History won't be kind.

[margaret thatcher]

lol did he really say that. how about becoming undisputed champ by beating a unified champ/olympic champ/#2 heavy in the world. that's a bit better than beating dill whyte


although tbh i dont think he intends to retire, and his wife said he wants the undisputed fight badly. im guessing he's doing his ususal talking nonsense and has been more truthful behind closed doors

[Ruthless-RKO]

Do we really know how good Wallin really is?

[margaret thatcher]

wallin vs whyte wouldve told us a lot i think, since whyte's level is pretty well established. wouldve been a better fight than whyte - fury obviously, still wouldnt mind it.

[fizzjambo]

Whyte’s comfortably the best of the three, he’s beaten a decent number of fringe contenders and his wins over Parker and Povetkin are decent enough, although both of those are debatable as decisive due to the butt and Pov being on the slide.

Wallin has a bit of potential but he his performance against Fury is a bit over rated by some and he really hasn’t done anything else noteworthy at a top ten level. I think he beats Chisora and it would be a good fight between him and Whyte that I’d still like to see - but there won’t be much money in it now.

Chisora is a gatekeeper and has never been anything else. His peak was over a decade ago when he was as robbed vs Helenius and gave Vlad a decent nights work. Since then he’s been hyped to the heavens and earned well, but really hasn’t beaten anyone of note.

[fizzjambo]

Whyte’s comfortably the best of the three, he’s beaten a decent number of fringe contenders and his wins over Parker and Povetkin are decent enough, although both of those are debatable as decisive due to the butt and Pov being on the slide.

Wallin has a bit of potential but he his performance against Fury is a bit over rated by some and he really hasn’t done anything else noteworthy at a top ten level. I think he beats Chisora and it would be a good fight between him and Whyte that I’d still like to see - but there won’t be much money in it now.

Chisora is a gatekeeper and has never been anything else. His peak was over a decade ago when he was as robbed vs Helenius and gave Vlad a decent nights work. Since then he’s been hyped to the heavens and earned well, but really hasn’t beaten anyone of note.

[fizzjambo]

And Fury is justifying retirement by saying 'there's nothing else I can do.'

A 40 yr old Klitschko, Wilder, and a third best opponent of either Chisora, Whyte or Wallin. What reality does this man inhabit?

History won't be kind.

It’s not a great resume but it’s now better than any other heavyweights of this generation. AJ has beaten the plenty of B level guys but he doesn’t have a stand out win on his resume

[fizzjambo]

I will still go with Dillian Whyte.

Maybe he picked the wrong game plan. Maybe he just wasn't feeling it. Maybe it simply was not his night because Fury has actually peaked as a heavyweight. But I cannot call Wallin the third best because a one-eyed Fury literally won every single round against the Swede.

The man will forever go down in the history books as being lucky he got Fury cut. Other than that he was never in the fight with Fury. But people want to make it bigger than what it was because of all the blood.

No, Whyte had the best credentials and had been the number one contender for 3 years. However on the basis of that performance I have little doubt that Wilder probably would have beaten Whyte.

Jesus Christ Almighty God bless you all

Good summary

[Phenomenal-Nutrition]

Whyte has the best HW resume. Chisora gave Fury a better challenge in their first fight. Wallin we need to see tested.

But Cunningham and Pajkic both knocked Fury down and gave him a better fight. Cunningham was a world champ at cruser too. Kevin Johnson became a journeyman after Fury but at the time I thought he gave Vitali a good challenge. Pajkic was undefeated but didn't box on after the Fury loss so he's a bit of an unknown.

[bripez]

And Fury is justifying retirement by saying 'there's nothing else I can do.'

A 40 yr old Klitschko, Wilder, and a third best opponent of either Chisora, Whyte or Wallin. What reality does this man inhabit?

History won't be kind.

True - there are people talking as if he is the best ever and here we are scratching around thinking of people he has beat.

[joshj909]

1. Wlad
2. Whyte
3. Wilder
4. Chisora
5. Wallin/Cunningham/Johnson

[Coco]

1. Wlad
2. Whyte
3. Wilder
4. Chisora
5. Wallin/Cunningham/Johnson

So if we are talking about the GOAT how does that list line up against Ali or Lennox?

Ali- Liston x2, Foreman, Frazier, before we get to the likes of Norton, Spinks, Foster, Patterson, Lyle and Quarry. Was Bugner better than Whyte?

Lennox- Holyfield, Tyson, McCall, Klit, Rahman, Briggs, Morrison, Tua, Ruddock, Golota- and the last 5 were completely dominant performances against guys in the same league as Whyte.

Outside of Wilder and Klit, has Fury really beaten fellas better than Bruno, Botha, Mercer, Tucker and Akinwande?

[joshj909]

1. Wlad
2. Whyte
3. Wilder
4. Chisora
5. Wallin/Cunningham/Johnson

So if we are talking about the GOAT how does that list line up against Ali or Lennox?

Ali- Liston x2, Foreman, Frazier, before we get to the likes of Norton, Spinks, Foster, Patterson, Lyle and Quarry. Was Bugner better than Whyte?

Lennox- Holyfield, Tyson, McCall, Klit, Rahman, Briggs, Morrison, Tua, Ruddock, Golota- and the last 5 were completely dominant performances against guys in the same league as Whyte.

Outside of Wilder and Klit, has Fury really beaten fellas better than Bruno, Botha, Mercer, Tucker and Akinwande?

Fury isn't close to the GOAT talks unless he beats Usyk and AJ. Maybe add the next top guy to come through after that should it be Joyce, Hrgovic, Yoka, Anderson or whoever else.

I'd also add that it's partly not Fury's fault. If he beats the rest of the division then it's not his fault that the division isn't up to the standard of previous generations. If he doesn't get around to it then it is his fault for failing a drugs test, pissing about with rematches and choosing to face a lot of warm ups and no names rather than the top guys when he had the chance.