Boxing myths

Post Reply
bigjack
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Boxing myths

Post by bigjack »

jimmystone wrote: 23 Apr 2022, 09:33
bigjack wrote: 23 Apr 2022, 09:30
Kilburn wrote: 23 Apr 2022, 09:27 It was a rough (and unfair) night for Gamache to put it mildly. But still, a bloody lovey finishing combo from Arturo.
what was unfair ? I don't know the story here
Gatti didn't weigh in properly. He got on the scale but it never settled. Nobody thinks he made weight. If he was a couple of pounds over at weigh in, which he could well have been, he will have been so much stronger on fight night than if he'd cut all the weight. He entered the ring at about 160lbs. Gamache 143lbs.
Ah right,well if that's the case it's not right
jimmystone
Bantamweight
Posts: 1597
Joined: 01 Dec 2021, 07:31

Re: Boxing myths

Post by jimmystone »

bigjack wrote: 23 Apr 2022, 09:34
jimmystone wrote: 23 Apr 2022, 09:33
bigjack wrote: 23 Apr 2022, 09:30

what was unfair ? I don't know the story here
Gatti didn't weigh in properly. He got on the scale but it never settled. Nobody thinks he made weight. If he was a couple of pounds over at weigh in, which he could well have been, he will have been so much stronger on fight night than if he'd cut all the weight. He entered the ring at about 160lbs. Gamache 143lbs.
Ah right,well if that's the case it's not right
NYSAC were found negligent. If Gatti's team leant on them, then I can see Loynsey's point that it may have been criminal negligence, I suppose. I know criminal law is not his specialism but he knows a shite load more than I ever will.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22939
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Boxing myths

Post by mickey1975 »

I was being sarcastic. Loynesy is indeed a legal guy.
jimmystone
Bantamweight
Posts: 1597
Joined: 01 Dec 2021, 07:31

Re: Boxing myths

Post by jimmystone »

mickey1975 wrote: 23 Apr 2022, 10:07 I was being sarcastic. Loynesy is indeed a legal guy.
I know he is but he's M&A rather than criminal, I believe. Like I said, he'll still know way more than me which is why I'm interested in why he thinks Gatti (or his team) were acting criminally. I suspect it's because he knows or suspects there was some sort of complicit agreement with the NYSAC to turn a blind eye, if that's the case I'm with him 100%. If it's just that Gatti managed to blag it on the scales and the NYSAC acted negligently in not making sure he weighed in properly, I disagree with him.
Loynesy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1767
Joined: 26 Sep 2003, 08:29

Re: Boxing myths

Post by Loynesy »

It's very sad and very disturbing and although it happened over 20 years ago, it almost killed a man I like very much.
Kilburn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6565
Joined: 25 Jul 2002, 07:27

Re: Boxing myths

Post by Kilburn »

While there’s no denying Gatti benefited from the weight shenanigans, we can only speculate as to what would have happened had he made it all the way down to 140 on the scales. It’s fair to say he could usually be relied upon to throw a lot of hard punches in a fight, whatever weight was reached. The 60 fight veteran Gamache was surely always going to be in for a torrid experience.

Could the wisdom of team Gamache taking a fight at 140 at that time be a tad questionable too, given how rough it was always likely to be against Gatti?
Glass Joe
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 4982
Joined: 08 Feb 2012, 10:29

Re: Boxing myths

Post by Glass Joe »

People offended by bad language

No one is every offended by swearing while watching the boxing. Blood, bad kos and brain damage much worse.
Grilling Machine
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3152
Joined: 16 Sep 2005, 02:28

Re: Boxing myths

Post by Grilling Machine »

Glass Joe wrote: 26 Apr 2022, 06:39Blood, bad kos and brain damage much worse.
And there's Smith and Froch.
polecateddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Boxing myths

Post by polecateddy »

A recent myth I guess might be that Deontay Wilder is really poor. Probably at this stage we have to listen to Tyson Fury and say probably only Fury and Usyk beats this guy. Not Joshua, who may avoid him like the plague.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22939
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Boxing myths

Post by mickey1975 »

polecateddy wrote: 27 Apr 2022, 04:43 A recent myth I guess might be that Deontay Wilder is really poor. Probably at this stage we have to listen to Tyson Fury and say probably only Fury and Usyk beats this guy. Not Joshua, who may avoid him like the plague.
Whyte has made Wilder look very good.
Frostieballs
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 1995
Joined: 15 Aug 2020, 17:38

Re: Boxing myths

Post by Frostieballs »

mickey1975 wrote: 27 Apr 2022, 07:14
polecateddy wrote: 27 Apr 2022, 04:43 A recent myth I guess might be that Deontay Wilder is really poor. Probably at this stage we have to listen to Tyson Fury and say probably only Fury and Usyk beats this guy. Not Joshua, who may avoid him like the plague.
Whyte has made Wilder look very good.
I don’t agree with that. Whyte has just made Whyte look bad.

Read down Wilders record, it just doesn’t stand up.

The Fury of Saturday night deals with Wilder just as handily.
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39204
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Boxing myths

Post by margaret thatcher »

mickey1975 wrote: 27 Apr 2022, 07:14
polecateddy wrote: 27 Apr 2022, 04:43 A recent myth I guess might be that Deontay Wilder is really poor. Probably at this stage we have to listen to Tyson Fury and say probably only Fury and Usyk beats this guy. Not Joshua, who may avoid him like the plague.
Whyte has made Wilder look very good.
otto wallin too, unlike deontay and whyte he was never budged either :yay:

with each fury win, the legends of wilder and wallin grow, which in turn makes them rank as better opponents for fury

works perfectly lol
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39204
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Boxing myths

Post by margaret thatcher »

polecateddy wrote: 27 Apr 2022, 04:43 A recent myth I guess might be that Deontay Wilder is really poor. Probably at this stage we have to listen to Tyson Fury and say probably only Fury and Usyk beats this guy. Not Joshua, who may avoid him like the plague.
i guess if usyk 'probably' beats wilder, josh is facing the tougher opponent than if he were fighting wilder
Last edited by margaret thatcher on 27 Apr 2022, 07:49, edited 1 time in total.
bigjack
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Boxing myths

Post by bigjack »

Glass Joe wrote: 26 Apr 2022, 06:39 People offended by bad language

No one is every offended by swearing while watching the boxing. Blood, bad kos and brain damage much worse.
I kid you not,i watched a channel 5 fight night and as the programme came back on after the ads there was a warning 'this programme may contain violence' :yay:
GreenLightning
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 915
Joined: 20 Jul 2011, 15:23

Re: Boxing myths

Post by GreenLightning »

Glass Joe wrote: 26 Apr 2022, 06:39 People offended by bad language

No one is every offended by swearing while watching the boxing. Blood, bad kos and brain damage much worse.
People have to understand that the apologies for the language isn't in case a snowflake viewer gets offended, it's for pre watershed replays of the fight, just covers their nut
GreenLightning
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 915
Joined: 20 Jul 2011, 15:23

Re: Boxing myths

Post by GreenLightning »

polecateddy wrote: 27 Apr 2022, 04:43 A recent myth I guess might be that Deontay Wilder is really poor. Probably at this stage we have to listen to Tyson Fury and say probably only Fury and Usyk beats this guy. Not Joshua, who may avoid him like the plague.
Ummmmmm neeeahhhhh his record is absolutely awful, handpicked opposition doesn't even describe it, remember even the first Fury fight Fury was pretty much handpicked because he looked dreadful in his comeback after being a suicidal drug addict for 4 years, and Wilder still got exposed
GreenLightning
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 915
Joined: 20 Jul 2011, 15:23

Re: Boxing myths

Post by GreenLightning »

Was Wilder ever matched with a durable journeyman type?? Most of his opponents were chinny and had been stopped before several times, that's why he never learned anything after 35 fights
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39204
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Boxing myths

Post by margaret thatcher »

well, i wish instead of getting these indirect victories, like wallin also gets, he had actually fought more top contenders. he may well couldve beaten everyone but fury or whatever the claim is, but gotta fight the fights

stiverne and brezeale being among the best 3 he's beaten in 45 fights is pretty weak.
bigjack
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Boxing myths

Post by bigjack »

GreenLightning wrote: 27 Apr 2022, 08:21
Glass Joe wrote: 26 Apr 2022, 06:39 People offended by bad language

No one is every offended by swearing while watching the boxing. Blood, bad kos and brain damage much worse.
People have to understand that the apologies for the language isn't in case a snowflake viewer gets offended, it's for pre watershed replays of the fight, just covers their nut
They could cover that with a statement before any replays though,like they do with lots of programmes now
polecateddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Boxing myths

Post by polecateddy »

I’m sure we can argue till the cows come home that Wilder has a poor record and might be a bit rubbish. But I just think probably on this Fury’s opinion carries a lot more weight than ours. I suspect Wilder will end up with Joe eventually, as I’m sure Fury will probably get Usyk and Joshua, and then possibly they will all retire.
Last edited by polecateddy on 27 Apr 2022, 08:47, edited 1 time in total.
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39204
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Boxing myths

Post by margaret thatcher »

hardly going to say the guy who is one of his very biggest wins aint much is he

although despite wilders flaws i agree he's a tough one to beat. fury and usyk id favour, josh 50/50ish, wilder the fave over everyone else. though at his age and following 2 KO losses he's got some questions about where he's currently at. might get surprised if he keeps fighting
GreenLightning
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 915
Joined: 20 Jul 2011, 15:23

Re: Boxing myths

Post by GreenLightning »

bigjack wrote: 27 Apr 2022, 08:37
GreenLightning wrote: 27 Apr 2022, 08:21
Glass Joe wrote: 26 Apr 2022, 06:39 People offended by bad language

No one is every offended by swearing while watching the boxing. Blood, bad kos and brain damage much worse.
People have to understand that the apologies for the language isn't in case a snowflake viewer gets offended, it's for pre watershed replays of the fight, just covers their nut
They could cover that with a statement before any replays though,like they do with lots of programmes now
Yeah I suppose, would a disclaimer cover them??
GreenLightning
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 915
Joined: 20 Jul 2011, 15:23

Re: Boxing myths

Post by GreenLightning »

polecateddy wrote: 27 Apr 2022, 08:42 I’m sure we can argue till the cows come home that Wilder has a poor record and might be a bit rubbish. But I just think probably on this Fury’s opinion carries a lot more weight than ours. I suspect Wilder will end up with Joe eventually, as I’m sure Fury will probably get Usyk and Joshua, and then possibly they will all retire.
True but we know that Furys opinion on someone can change with the weather, Fury seems to have a bit of a soft spot for big Deontay, I don't think he even responded to any of Wilders crazy accusations after the second fight, and he actually seemed a bit hurt when Deontay threw his toys out of the pram again after the third and wouldn't shake his hand
Frostieballs
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 1995
Joined: 15 Aug 2020, 17:38

Re: Boxing myths

Post by Frostieballs »

GreenLightning wrote: 27 Apr 2022, 08:21
Glass Joe wrote: 26 Apr 2022, 06:39 People offended by bad language

No one is every offended by swearing while watching the boxing. Blood, bad kos and brain damage much worse.
People have to understand that the apologies for the language isn't in case a snowflake viewer gets offended, it's for pre watershed replays of the fight, just covers their nut
I think they would edit the replay? They couldn’t let a swear go out at midday and just cover themselves with an apology.
jimmystone
Bantamweight
Posts: 1597
Joined: 01 Dec 2021, 07:31

Re: Boxing myths

Post by jimmystone »

Glass Joe wrote: 26 Apr 2022, 06:39 People offended by bad language

No one is every offended by swearing while watching the boxing. Blood, bad kos and brain damage much worse.
It's a balance. I watch boxing with my youngest and I dip the sound between rounds. I have no problem with him swearing in context in due course but he's a bit young yet compared to his older siblings. Other parents may be caught off guard. I don't know anything about Ofcom and their rules but if I were caught out and Adam Smith did his apology it would lend weight to my explanation to my child about why I wouldn't want him repeating the language at the wrong time, in the wrong place, etc. It's not about offence for me, it's about educating my youngster.
Post Reply