tyson fury vs sam langford

Post Reply
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39234
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

tyson fury vs sam langford

Post by margaret thatcher »

since sam langford beats vitali klitschko, with sam using his height advantage to do so, how about sam vs the more nimble tyson fury?
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15668
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Re: tyson fury vs sam langford

Post by elmersalsa »

I love the great Sam Langford, but ain't he too short? He was 5'7" at the most.
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39234
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: tyson fury vs sam langford

Post by margaret thatcher »

ya, but might sam actually have the height advantage, since fury would have to punch so low
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13873
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: tyson fury vs sam langford

Post by DrDuke »

margaret thatcher wrote: 02 May 2022, 22:41 ya, but might sam actually have the height advantage, since fury would have to punch so low
Also, Langford gotta have the weight advantage, because big modern boxers are so slow because of their size and modernity. While Fury will try his slow low punch, Langford with use the weight advantage and connect 10 shots of his own.
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39234
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: tyson fury vs sam langford

Post by margaret thatcher »

exactly, plus it must be harder for fury to breath being so high up there, less oxygen
scorpio83
Middleweight
Posts: 4596
Joined: 18 Aug 2013, 06:01

Re: tyson fury vs sam langford

Post by scorpio83 »

Either Fury out-box and out-punch Langford from long range behind his jabs and combinations to take a decision or late round stoppage even though Langford was a great fighter.
tiny_acres
Middleweight
Posts: 9436
Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43

Re: tyson fury vs sam langford

Post by tiny_acres »

margaret thatcher wrote: 02 May 2022, 23:13 exactly, plus it must be harder for fury to breath being so high up there, less oxygen
:lol:
Post Reply