Proposal for language simplification

Post Reply
pundit
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Proposal for language simplification

Post by pundit »

Instead of saying

"fighter X ducked an opponent Y who would have had a remote chances of beating fighter X, as opponent Y is reasonable competent and fights a style that is not taylor-made for fighter X and/or doesn't accept the fight 100 percent on fighter X's terms"

we say in future simply

"fighter X did a Calzaghe".

Everybody knows what is meant.

Cheers, P :TU:
Taki...
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 936
Joined: 30 Jun 2005, 15:46

Post by Taki... »

Hilarious...... maybe. :roll:

How about instead of saying; "X is a hater because he's always moaning about Y".

We simply say; "X is being a right Pundit"?

:TU:
pundit
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Post by pundit »

Taki... wrote:Hilarious...... maybe. :roll:

How about instead of saying; "X is a hater because he's always moaning about Y".

We simply say; "X is being a right Pundit"?

:TU:
That's not much of a simplification.
bigynzing
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 393
Joined: 25 Dec 2003, 12:40

Post by bigynzing »

What about........

"My guts are freakin killing me...i could really do with a great big pundit right about now."

or perhaps....

"Man that girl is hot...i sure would like to see her sliding up and down on my pundit."

Or if you want to confuse things a little....

For f*cks sake...pundit is right up Kesslers pundit"


I like tha last one the best personally.

:TU: :TU:
Post Reply