Boxing … Money or legacy

Spud
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Boxing … Money or legacy

Post by Spud »

If you were a boxer and please answer honestly….

Would you go for MONEY or LEGACY

Can you name boxers who went for the money before belts.

After working in the sport for years I see both sides and have splinters on my arse as a result of sitting on the fence.
Fray Bentos
Lightweight
Posts: 16813
Joined: 25 Dec 2017, 14:12

Re: Boxing … Money or legacy

Post by Fray Bentos »

Neither, both in the pro game will lead to your health going for a burton.

I would just stay amateur, especially with today's set up and I was at that level.

With a lot of pros - especially with the heavyweights where they can earn good money like Danny Williams, Julius Francis etc - legacy has nothing to do with it because I don't suppose legacy pays the bills, you always need a 'Plan B' in this life, moreso if you are boxing for a living.
Spud
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Boxing … Money or legacy

Post by Spud »

I see you named Julius Francis … his fee for the Tyson fight was just over £400k
Fray Bentos
Lightweight
Posts: 16813
Joined: 25 Dec 2017, 14:12

Re: Boxing … Money or legacy

Post by Fray Bentos »

Spud wrote: 20 May 2022, 04:49 I see you named Julius Francis … his fee for the Tyson fight was just over £400k
Yeah, but he went though it, that's the problem, I suppose you need 'Plan B' whilst boxing. Probably got him a house and he is now mortgage free in London and he's invested but you still gotta eat in the meantime.
Last edited by Fray Bentos on 20 May 2022, 05:00, edited 1 time in total.
Spud
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Boxing … Money or legacy

Post by Spud »

Fray Bentos wrote: 20 May 2022, 04:51
Spud wrote: 20 May 2022, 04:49 I see you named Julius Francis … his fee for the Tyson fight was just over £400k
Yeah, but it went though it, that's the problem, I suppose you need 'Plan B' whilst boxing. Probably got him a house and he is now mortgage free in London and he's invested but you still gotta eat in the meantime.
True

Julius went from 400k for the Tyson fight to a little over £30k for a British title shot
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32925
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Boxing … Money or legacy

Post by Boxerbeetle »

It’s all too easy to say ‘legacy’ from the sidelines. But if I was in that position myself, definitely the money. Boxing is a short, extremely dangerous career, maximising income is a no-brainer. Get your money and get out asap.
Spud
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Boxing … Money or legacy

Post by Spud »

Boxerbeetle wrote: 20 May 2022, 05:02 It’s all too easy to say ‘legacy’ from the sidelines. But if I was in that position myself, definitely the money. Boxing is a short, extremely dangerous career, maximising income is a no-brainer. Get your money and get out asap.
So why do boxers take so much sh it for not taking fights because the money on the B side is pittance
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32925
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Boxing … Money or legacy

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Spud wrote: 20 May 2022, 05:05
Boxerbeetle wrote: 20 May 2022, 05:02 It’s all too easy to say ‘legacy’ from the sidelines. But if I was in that position myself, definitely the money. Boxing is a short, extremely dangerous career, maximising income is a no-brainer. Get your money and get out asap.
So why do boxers take so much sh it for not taking fights because the money on the B side is pittance
Because we’re talking from the sidelines! A boxer’s bank balance makes no difference to the fans, we don’t get a cut. So we’ll always want the legacy fights.
Spud
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Boxing … Money or legacy

Post by Spud »

Because we’re talking from the sidelines! A boxer’s bank balance makes no difference to the fans, we don’t get a cut. So we’ll always want the legacy fights.
Good post :TU:
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28495
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Boxing … Money or legacy

Post by Coco »

You need to be able to afford a legacy!
banjo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 26446
Joined: 20 Nov 2007, 03:17

Re: Boxing … Money or legacy

Post by banjo »

Money

Legacy doesn't pay the bills.
chiggsy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1387
Joined: 12 Feb 2010, 03:09

Re: Boxing … Money or legacy

Post by chiggsy »

Money all day long
Verdi
Welterweight
Posts: 819
Joined: 12 Apr 2016, 18:08

Re: Boxing … Money or legacy

Post by Verdi »

Money. But sometimes you have to take less to make more in the long run.
The Docker
Bantamweight
Posts: 615
Joined: 16 Feb 2022, 15:26

Re: Boxing … Money or legacy

Post by The Docker »

Hmm, there is no carte blanche answer here. Depends at what point you are in your career, your potential, and what if any financial backing you have. A promising unbeaten young gun will believe in legacy, get a few losses on the scorecard then bigger money fights have to be the priority. A journeyman is solely for cash and then you have the ATG elite, who have fame and fortune together with losses who fight purely to prolong legacy. So yeah, different strokes for different folks.
SticknMove
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6000
Joined: 04 Aug 2006, 09:02

Re: Boxing … Money or legacy

Post by SticknMove »

The only legacy is for the individual boxer going through the process. They have to go through the cocoon. So as much money as they can possibly get is OK with me. :TU:
tiny_acres
Middleweight
Posts: 9521
Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43

Re: Boxing … Money or legacy

Post by tiny_acres »

I know we as fans think. I'd want the greatest legacy in history and fight every top contender and champion, moving up weight classes and getting into wars to secure our legacy.
But in reality we would take the most money with the least risk. Legacy is great but it don't pay the bills
Cent0089
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3604
Joined: 03 May 2013, 13:02

Re: Boxing … Money or legacy

Post by Cent0089 »

Boxer always want legacy ... people around him want money
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28495
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Boxing … Money or legacy

Post by Coco »

Cent0089 wrote: 21 May 2022, 09:38 Boxer always want legacy ... people around him want money
Boxers want money too
Glass Joe
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 5006
Joined: 08 Feb 2012, 10:29

Re: Boxing … Money or legacy

Post by Glass Joe »

John Murray had a sucessful career but didnt really have a penny to his name come retirement. Explains it on boxiing life stories.
tonyevs
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5844
Joined: 08 Feb 2004, 18:13

Re: Boxing … Money or legacy

Post by tonyevs »

Money is the driver for sure. As pretty much all successfully sports people - they will typically have neglected education for sporting success. So they have put all their eggs in one basket.

Whilst we have some articulate sports people who successfully moved to commentating, in most cases they are not intelligent enough or able to succeed in anything outside of their chosen sport .. hence if they earned some money they open a gym/coaching - which turns into a money pit, until they skint.

Only a few fortunate ones keep hold of the money; and that typically down to good people advising them.

Legacy for being rich is the only legacy a pro boxer wants.
tiny_acres
Middleweight
Posts: 9521
Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43

Re: Boxing … Money or legacy

Post by tiny_acres »

Cent0089 wrote: 21 May 2022, 09:38 Boxer always want legacy ... people around him want money
Go ask any fighter if they want money or a lasting legacy.
I'd bet the majority of them would say show me the money.
Legacy doesn't pay the bills
rhino222
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6616
Joined: 09 Sep 2005, 09:38

Re: Boxing … Money or legacy

Post by rhino222 »

Is there any fighter that we can name that has a legacy but no money?

Julius Francis has/had money but no legacy (Im presuming by legacy we are talking about a resume that includes a notable world title belt?)

Kell Brook has a legacy and therefore money

Amir Khan has a legacy and therefore money

From where im sat... Legacy = Money. if we are talking about the last 20 years or so.
Wee Tommy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Boxing … Money or legacy

Post by Wee Tommy »

rhino222 wrote: 22 May 2022, 13:08 Is there any fighter that we can name that has a legacy but no money?

Julius Francis has/had money but no legacy (Im presuming by legacy we are talking about a resume that includes a notable world title belt?)

Kell Brook has a legacy and therefore money

Amir Khan has a legacy and therefore money

From where im sat... Legacy = Money. if we are talking about the last 20 years or so.

Holyfield. Lost most of his cash. Has a huge legacy.

Ken Buchanan
jimmystone
Bantamweight
Posts: 1597
Joined: 01 Dec 2021, 07:31

Re: Boxing … Money or legacy

Post by jimmystone »

Joe Louis is the most famous example. One of the best heavyweights of all time. Was skint.
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28495
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Boxing … Money or legacy

Post by Coco »

Looking at more recent guys who haven't won world titles, Cheeseman, Kerman Lejurra(sp)
Great value but I bet would be going back to the day job if retired.
Most at feather and below, Ingle, Brodie, Steve Robinson, Scott Harrison spring to mind. I don't think Robinson is skint but I bet his legacy is much bigger than his wallet!
Last edited by Coco on 22 May 2022, 14:11, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply