theone wrote:
BrocktonBlockbuster49 wrote:
evsrbn, holys biggest fan claims holyfields prime was 89-93. i agree.... u will see holy looks a lot faster, sharper, his reflexes are better in these years. so were taking the 205lb holyfield of these years. not the slower, bulked up holyfield.
As much as I repect evndrbsn's opinion I dont agree with him on this point. It was the second lightest he ever weighed as a heavyweight and lost his only fight. Holyifled best preformances were around the 215 range so that for me is his best fighting weight.
I meant his heavyweight prime was '89 to '93. Holyfield is a very difficult fighter to gauge for his prime years, though. I have always maintained that Holyfield's prime years were from 1986/1987 to 1992. I feel that when Holyfield added unnecessary weight after the Bowe loss, effectively ending his prime. He looked for the first time truly dreadful for the rematch against Alex Stewart, which he came into the ring bone dry. With the added weight, Holyfield's speed and stamina were never the same again. He started having off nights more frequently after bulking up.
I include '93 for the rematch with Bowe, where he looked terrific. In his next fight against Moorer, he looked dreadful again, rarely stringing together his trademark combinations. I still feel that Holyfield won that fight, and it should have been ruled a draw by the judges. I'm pretty sure I read in Sports Illustrated after the fight that one of the judges scored round 2 (when Moorer was dropped) 10-10 and another scored it 10-9. The decision should have been overturned based on the 10-10 score which should not be possible on the 10 point must system with a knockdown.
I think Holyfield's best post-1993 performances were: W 10 Ray Mercer (209lbs), TKO 11 Mike Tyson (215lbs), WDQ 3 Mike Tyson (218lbs), and TKO 8 Michael Moorer (214lbs). Those were between 1995 and 1997. After that Holyfield never looked "great" again. He mustered up some good post-prime performances, notably against Lennox Lewis in the rematch (217lbs) and Hasim Rahman (216lbs). That is six fights I thought he looked impressive in since the second Bowe fight. He looked bad in the other eleven fights after 1993, where he weighed anywhere from 211 to 221. The three John Ruiz fights COULD be argued to be decent performances, given how bad John Ruiz makes people look, but I think Holyfield of a couple years earlier makes RUIZ look bad. Still, I had all three fights for Holyfield (the second fight I had 113-112 for Holyfield, even with the ridicilous point deduction. I hold stern that Holyfield KO'd Ruiz in round 10 with a body shot, not a low blow).
After clearing that up, I say that the 185 version, the 205 version, AND the 215 version of Holyfield are each too much for the best of Marciano. Holyfield at his best was simply better in every regard: he was faster, a better boxer, bigger, better stamina, better combination punching, less cut prone, and the physically stronger heavyweight. Remember that in the late 1990s and early 2000s, Holyfield was considered the most physically powerful heavyweight. Don't confuse that with the hardest hitting. I also think Holyfield had a chin on par with and probably better than Marciano.
What was the topic of this thread again? I forget.