Tyson Fury … how good is he?
-
polecateddy
- Heavyweight

Re: Tyson Fury … how good is he?
I much prefer the Lewis era, but that’s probably an age thing on my part. But it’s a serious question as to whether Fury really has the right mindset of a champion. Would he for instance have maintained a decent reign in the peak Klitschko era? Wlad and Vitali are pretty smart and tenacious fighters. They’d have kept coming for him and maybe pinpointed the weak spots.
Re: Tyson Fury … how good is he?
Fury would give a lesson to the Big Klit as well.polecateddy wrote: ↑10 Jun 2022, 04:40 I much prefer the Lewis era, but that’s probably an age thing on my part. But it’s a serious question as to whether Fury really has the right mindset of a champion. Would he for instance have maintained a decent reign in the peak Klitschko era? Wlad and Vitali are pretty smart and tenacious fighters. They’d have kept coming for him and maybe pinpointed the weak spots.
Re: Tyson Fury … how good is he?
Fury might have done okay against some of the shorter fighters from better era’s, but the likes of Bowe and Lewis would have certainly embarrassed him.
I think it would be a bit daft to bring Fury’s name into any GOAT debate. He clearly doesn’t have attributes that you can call great, in the context of boxing history.
Fury is a very tall man who has enough skill and fitness to make his size work for him in what is undoubtedly a poor era for heavyweights. That’s not greatness.
I think it would be a bit daft to bring Fury’s name into any GOAT debate. He clearly doesn’t have attributes that you can call great, in the context of boxing history.
Fury is a very tall man who has enough skill and fitness to make his size work for him in what is undoubtedly a poor era for heavyweights. That’s not greatness.
Re: Tyson Fury … how good is he?
Fury reportedly in talks to fight Usyk or Josh on Dec 17th in Saudi.
-
TheLeprechaun
- Middleweight
- Posts: 5148
- Joined: 27 Jun 2013, 20:42
Re: Tyson Fury … how good is he?
I think Bowe is the worst possible matchup for Fury. He's better on the inside, has the heart of a lion, recuperates very quickly from being hurt and will not stop coming at you. He's got a very high pedigree and when he was in his prime with Futch in his corner he was a very dangerous operator indeed.Kilburn wrote: ↑11 Jun 2022, 06:38 Fury might have done okay against some of the shorter fighters from better era’s, but the likes of Bowe and Lewis would have certainly embarrassed him.
I think it would be a bit daft to bring Fury’s name into any GOAT debate. He clearly doesn’t have attributes that you can call great, in the context of boxing history.
Fury is a very tall man who has enough skill and fitness to make his size work for him in what is undoubtedly a poor era for heavyweights. That’s not greatness.
Re: Tyson Fury … how good is he?
why tho bowe best wins against herbie hyde ,Golota , tyson would do a number on him Holyfield aint a heavy weight johny nelson would of done himKilburn wrote: ↑11 Jun 2022, 06:38 Fury might have done okay against some of the shorter fighters from better era’s, but the likes of Bowe and Lewis would have certainly embarrassed him.
I think it would be a bit daft to bring Fury’s name into any GOAT debate. He clearly doesn’t have attributes that you can call great, in the context of boxing history.
Fury is a very tall man who has enough skill and fitness to make his size work for him in what is undoubtedly a poor era for heavyweights. That’s not greatness.
Re: Tyson Fury … how good is he?
tyson is number 1 for me , yea lewis was good but tyson can box and front foot it he would beat lewis
Re: Tyson Fury … how good is he?
Great thread !
Sure to cause some good arguments, because it's so hard to tell with HWs because of the size-increase-thing. I'm certain that Joe Frazier (say) was better than Fury, but it's hard to give him much of a chance with Fury when he couldn't handle the size of Foreman.
Tyson decisions his namesake to take Iron Mike's place in the All-Time Top 10 ?
I
Sure to cause some good arguments, because it's so hard to tell with HWs because of the size-increase-thing. I'm certain that Joe Frazier (say) was better than Fury, but it's hard to give him much of a chance with Fury when he couldn't handle the size of Foreman.
Tyson decisions his namesake to take Iron Mike's place in the All-Time Top 10 ?
I
-
Wee Tommy
- Heavyweight

Re: Tyson Fury … how good is he?
Wtfbrilo33 wrote: ↑11 Jun 2022, 12:56why tho bowe best wins against herbie hyde ,Golota , tyson would do a number on him Holyfield aint a heavy weight johny nelson would of done himKilburn wrote: ↑11 Jun 2022, 06:38 Fury might have done okay against some of the shorter fighters from better era’s, but the likes of Bowe and Lewis would have certainly embarrassed him.
I think it would be a bit daft to bring Fury’s name into any GOAT debate. He clearly doesn’t have attributes that you can call great, in the context of boxing history.
Fury is a very tall man who has enough skill and fitness to make his size work for him in what is undoubtedly a poor era for heavyweights. That’s not greatness.
-
tigermoth87
- Welterweight
- Posts: 1793
- Joined: 21 Feb 2016, 11:23
Re: Tyson Fury … how good is he?
He'd do a number of any heavyweight in history with the possible exception of Vitali and Lewis.
He's bigger and heavier than any boxer in any other generation--fact. Yet is fast and elusive.
Plus he knows how to use his size well--especially against smaller fighters. Little men like Ali wouldn't stand a chance.
He's bigger and heavier than any boxer in any other generation--fact. Yet is fast and elusive.
Plus he knows how to use his size well--especially against smaller fighters. Little men like Ali wouldn't stand a chance.
-
polecateddy
- Heavyweight

Re: Tyson Fury … how good is he?
There’s a test there isn’t there. Usyk is one of those ‘little men’ who probably wouldn’t try to brag about being any better than Ali or Holmes. Can Fury actually beat him? I personally think Mike Tyson looked 10 times more dynamic a puncher than Daniel Dubois. You can’t overlook other generations so easily in boxing.tigermoth87 wrote: ↑12 Jun 2022, 23:01 He'd do a number of any heavyweight in history with the possible exception of Vitali and Lewis.
He's bigger and heavier than any boxer in any other generation--fact. Yet is fast and elusive.
Plus he knows how to use his size well--especially against smaller fighters. Little men like Ali wouldn't stand a chance.
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45213
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Tyson Fury … how good is he?
It will be interesting to see how the fight with Usyk goes.
One thing I will say for Fury, is he has a good fight IQ, I expect him to try and use his size and weight to hold, maul and roughouse Usyk whenever he gets into range, and to potshot with the jab and right cross.
He's goint to have a massive size and weight advantage, although it was notable that Usyk didn't really look undersized against Joshua, though Fury is a much naturally bigger man than Joshua, who is pumped up with weights, and actually looks naturally fairly slim. Fury is a right big old lump./
One thing I will say for Fury, is he has a good fight IQ, I expect him to try and use his size and weight to hold, maul and roughouse Usyk whenever he gets into range, and to potshot with the jab and right cross.
He's goint to have a massive size and weight advantage, although it was notable that Usyk didn't really look undersized against Joshua, though Fury is a much naturally bigger man than Joshua, who is pumped up with weights, and actually looks naturally fairly slim. Fury is a right big old lump./
-
Spud
- Heavyweight

Re: Tyson Fury … how good is he?
Fury v Usyk is a bloody brilliant fight.
I am really looking forward to that fight being made.
I am really looking forward to that fight being made.
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39213
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Tyson Fury … how good is he?
aj would look a lot less slim with rolls and rolls of fat around his waist wouldnt hejamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑13 Jun 2022, 13:54 It will be interesting to see how the fight with Usyk goes.
One thing I will say for Fury, is he has a good fight IQ, I expect him to try and use his size and weight to hold, maul and roughouse Usyk whenever he gets into range, and to potshot with the jab and right cross.
He's goint to have a massive size and weight advantage, although it was notable that Usyk didn't really look undersized against Joshua, though Fury is a much naturally bigger man than Joshua, who is pumped up with weights, and actually looks naturally fairly slim. Fury is a right big old lump./
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45213
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Tyson Fury … how good is he?
His frame is considerable smaller than Fury's.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑13 Jun 2022, 14:07aj would look a lot less slim with rolls and rolls of fat around his waist wouldnt hejamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑13 Jun 2022, 13:54 It will be interesting to see how the fight with Usyk goes.
One thing I will say for Fury, is he has a good fight IQ, I expect him to try and use his size and weight to hold, maul and roughouse Usyk whenever he gets into range, and to potshot with the jab and right cross.
He's goint to have a massive size and weight advantage, although it was notable that Usyk didn't really look undersized against Joshua, though Fury is a much naturally bigger man than Joshua, who is pumped up with weights, and actually looks naturally fairly slim. Fury is a right big old lump./
Trying to find some reliable stats - one of them says Fury is a 44 inch chest - which seems impossible, I'm a 42 and I'm tiny compared to Fury.,
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39213
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: Tyson Fury … how good is he?
how can you tell? he's got loads of fat covering it ..........skinny legs though
Re: Tyson Fury … how good is he?
I guess, Fury won't box Usyk, he'll overwhelm him. Usyk has always looked uncomfortable under the rough onslaught, while Fury can impose such game more convincingly than any other fighter.
Re: Tyson Fury … how good is he?
aj build is a lot smaller than fury you can see it he has small wasit, i would say dubious naturaly bigger than aj i know he is big anyway, fury is naturaly a big huge man, aj is a lot of front delt shoulders biceps but his frame aint wide, i am the same ive lifted weights for years 10 years soild never missed a planned workout my older brother still just naturally bigger than me he dont liftjamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑13 Jun 2022, 14:09His frame is considerable smaller than Fury's.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑13 Jun 2022, 14:07aj would look a lot less slim with rolls and rolls of fat around his waist wouldnt hejamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑13 Jun 2022, 13:54 It will be interesting to see how the fight with Usyk goes.
One thing I will say for Fury, is he has a good fight IQ, I expect him to try and use his size and weight to hold, maul and roughouse Usyk whenever he gets into range, and to potshot with the jab and right cross.
He's goint to have a massive size and weight advantage, although it was notable that Usyk didn't really look undersized against Joshua, though Fury is a much naturally bigger man than Joshua, who is pumped up with weights, and actually looks naturally fairly slim. Fury is a right big old lump./
Trying to find some reliable stats - one of them says Fury is a 44 inch chest - which seems impossible, I'm a 42 and I'm tiny compared to Fury.,
Re: Tyson Fury … how good is he?
its easy to lol but why tho , yea i might be being a bit flippant with my commentWee Tommy wrote: ↑12 Jun 2022, 16:37Wtfbrilo33 wrote: ↑11 Jun 2022, 12:56why tho bowe best wins against herbie hyde ,Golota , tyson would do a number on him Holyfield aint a heavy weight johny nelson would of done himKilburn wrote: ↑11 Jun 2022, 06:38 Fury might have done okay against some of the shorter fighters from better era’s, but the likes of Bowe and Lewis would have certainly embarrassed him.
I think it would be a bit daft to bring Fury’s name into any GOAT debate. He clearly doesn’t have attributes that you can call great, in the context of boxing history.
Fury is a very tall man who has enough skill and fitness to make his size work for him in what is undoubtedly a poor era for heavyweights. That’s not greatness.![]()
![]()
![]()
-
Spud
- Heavyweight

Re: Tyson Fury … how good is he?
I have always been tough on Tyson and have never given him any credit, but, even with that said I honestly feel Joshua has faced tougher opponents l.
Fury (supposedly) is retiring too early.
Fury (supposedly) is retiring too early.
-
Wee Tommy
- Heavyweight

Re: Tyson Fury … how good is he?
Re: Tyson Fury … how good is he?
Love ya Spuddy but who are these tougher opponents that Joshua has faced?
Usyk you can argue at best, but I feel he needs another top heavyweight on his curriculum vitae before he’s considered at Fury’s level.
Witherspoon, Del and AJ x2 is good going; it’s not a tremendous heavyweight career if it stopped there.
Re: Tyson Fury … how good is he?
like i say i was beeing a bit flippant gets peoples view points out more , i was more talking about heavy weights tho , also was that pre peds holyfield
-
Wee Tommy
- Heavyweight

Re: Tyson Fury … how good is he?
Pre peds holy was far better imo but then again Qawi reckoned he was on something when he fought him so who knows.
I’ve took all sorts of gear myself and been very strong and tbh I fight a lot better and hit harder smaller and leaner. Not be the same for everyone but it is for me.
Re: Tyson Fury … how good is he?
i can see that,i never did the peds my selfs , but i lift weights so i do emember bulking up from 12 st to 15 in 3 months getting shin splinters, knees going breathing chest feeling heavy when shadow boxing but on 5000 cals a day you have great energy plus you can move weight around easy overheadpressing as well , plus and minus i guessWee Tommy wrote: ↑17 Jun 2022, 16:31Pre peds holy was far better imo but then again Qawi reckoned he was on something when he fought him so who knows.
I’ve took all sorts of gear myself and been very strong and tbh I fight a lot better and hit harder smaller and leaner. Not be the same for everyone but it is for me.