NSF Policy

delisa · Post by **delisa** » 09 Aug 2006, 18:20

What is the boxrec policy re NSF?

Blue · Post by **Blue** » 09 Aug 2006, 18:59

AFAIK, the full result is entered and NSF is entered into the comment field.

To ignore reality is dangerous for the fighters. :(
After all, I think most doctors & commissions would like to know when a
fighter is stopped and might have suffered a possible concussion.

delisa · Post by **delisa** » 10 Aug 2006, 13:37

I thought that is what it was and makes sense to me.

Reason I asked is a few fights on Butterbean's record are NSF but the result isn't listed, instead they are NC 2 of 4, etc.

Post by **John** » 10 Aug 2006, 14:42

I put the result in and add <font color=red>Non Sanctioned Fight</font> as a comment

Rocky_Lives · Post by **Rocky_Lives** » 12 Aug 2006, 00:57

John-

Just a FYI, the state of Wyoming has no commission, therefore ever since the ABC rules change last year any fight in Wyoming would be a non-sanctioned fight and is not recognized by other states on the fighters record. It may be worth noting that a few fighters have been quite active out of Wyoming the last year and a half, creating a bit of a discrepincy between their fight fax record and their boxrec record.

Blue · Post by **Blue** » 12 Aug 2006, 04:24

delisa wrote:I thought that is what it was and makes sense to me.

Reason I asked is a few fights on Butterbean's record are NSF but the result isn't listed, instead they are NC 2 of 4, etc.

I have entered the results with NSF in the comment field.

What is interesting about the Lansing, Michigan show on 04-21-95 is though “Butterbean”
TKO 2 Robinson was recorded an NSF, the other 4 bouts on the card were not.
http://www.boxrec.com/show_display.php?show_id=48583

The foolishness of not posting the actual result is evident as Robinson was stopped
in 1 rd 4 days later at Indianapolis, IN. :(
http://www.boxrec.com/show_display.php?show_id=50507

I am not concerned about the discrepancy with fight fax as we are reporting the “facts”.