Scott Gammer vs Danny Williams is on?

stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27497
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Post by stujones »

I've heard Danny is well up for the fight and down to 15 stone already.


Oh... we haven't had that press release yet.
Max Molyneux
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7084
Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53

Post by Max Molyneux »

Neri1983 wrote:
Max Molyneux wrote:
nickd wrote: The winning bid is £63k.

Gammer as champion gets 60% - £37,800

Williams as challenger gets 40% - £25,200

Will Williams be up for that sort of money? There aren't really any big money fights out there for him right now.
What crap money for a British title fight and Heavyweight one at that. :o
Michael Gomez got about 16k for his British title challenge to Alex Arthur so maybe this is pretty standard for British title bouts ?

I think Williams should take this bout, and if he think's he is above this level then he is being stupid. He has been knocked down to this level, his own fault.

As for McDonnell he could be really putting Danny to work in the gym but if Wiliams goes homes every night and eats Kipling Cakes etc then who is to blame?
As Nick says it must be the going rate.

I agree he should take it as it's the right come back fight but would have to see it first.
Max Molyneux
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7084
Joined: 16 Aug 2004, 16:53

Post by Max Molyneux »

I've heard Danny is well up for the fight and down to 15 stone already.
Did Mc Donnell pay for the surgery? :o
bigynzing
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 393
Joined: 25 Dec 2003, 12:40

Post by bigynzing »

Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:Can't see Danny motivating himself for this. He seems to think for some crazy reason that he should be mixing in the top echelon of world heavyweights and will (wrongly) see someone like Gammer as being beneath him.
Please excuse my ignorance but are you the same guy who wrote the Gammer piece in BM????...if so, well done..it was a good read.
states
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3554
Joined: 26 Jun 2004, 13:40

Post by states »

bigynzing wrote:
Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:Can't see Danny motivating himself for this. He seems to think for some crazy reason that he should be mixing in the top echelon of world heavyweights and will (wrongly) see someone like Gammer as being beneath him.
Please excuse my ignorance but are you the same guy who wrote the Gammer piece in BM????...if so, well done..it was a good read.
One Ian McNeilly, there's only one Ian McNeilly...... :D

Just don't mention 'Uppercut'. :x
nickd
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7071
Joined: 17 Mar 2004, 13:45

Post by nickd »

Neri1983 wrote:
Max Molyneux wrote:
nickd wrote: The winning bid is £63k.

Gammer as champion gets 60% - £37,800

Williams as challenger gets 40% - £25,200

Will Williams be up for that sort of money? There aren't really any big money fights out there for him right now.
What crap money for a British title fight and Heavyweight one at that. :o
Michael Gomez got about 16k for his British title challenge to Alex Arthur so maybe this is pretty standard for British title bouts ?

I think Williams should take this bout, and if he think's he is above this level then he is being stupid. He has been knocked down to this level, his own fault.

As for McDonnell he could be really putting Danny to work in the gym but if Wiliams goes homes every night and eats Kipling Cakes etc then who is to blame?
If McDonnell had any morals and wasn't a money grabbing little tosser he'd have dumped Williams long ago. He's considered a joke these day through his constant bullshit where Williams' conditioning is concerned.
KOJOE90
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7461
Joined: 12 May 2002, 12:12

Post by KOJOE90 »

The date of October 13th has been mentioned.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27497
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Post by stujones »

states wrote:
bigynzing wrote:
Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:Can't see Danny motivating himself for this. He seems to think for some crazy reason that he should be mixing in the top echelon of world heavyweights and will (wrongly) see someone like Gammer as being beneath him.
Please excuse my ignorance but are you the same guy who wrote the Gammer piece in BM????...if so, well done..it was a good read.
One Ian McNeilly, there's only one Ian McNeilly...... :D

Just don't mention 'Uppercut'. :x
When I saw there was a Scott Gammer piece, I thought "I wonder how much will copy that beautifully written piece of poetry that was the fight report over at BBN".... However, fair do's safe to say he copies f all of it and it was nice to read such a report, focusing more on the aftermath than the fight itself.

Do you know if any scribe was there that night, cause I didn't see any.
Post Reply