That was quite a post from way back in 2018.
Who would have thought back then that the Usyk fight would be the first to be made?
Depending on your era you can be good and do it though. John Ruiz managed it, for example, and I don’t think he was “very good” either. He was good, which is better than average. But for arguments sake, John Ruiz was absolutely elite when compared to the vast majority of boxers ever. But he typically isn’t compared with the guy ranked 128th in 1912…because of his time as a belt holder with multiple defenses he’d always have to be compared against the top guys in which case very good isn’t the right description. I know it’s semantics and subjective to each persons description and context though.tiny_acres wrote: ↑28 Aug 2022, 13:43Definitely a very good Heavyweight.
You don't win the title and defend it multiple times and be called average.
Some fans think that if a fighter is not top 10 all time they suck
Couldn't agree more. Boxing fans are the only fans that give their athletes so little respect. Casual fans are often only aware of a good fighter's losses. Take my favorite era for instance. My buddies remember Bobick better by when he was spoofed on SNL than they remember at one time he was the #1 or #2 ranked amateur. Marvis Frazier was also an excellent amateur and decent pro. He is also remembered by his KO by 1 fights.gilgamesh wrote: ↑28 Aug 2022, 13:49Which goes to show how little they know about the sport.tiny_acres wrote: ↑28 Aug 2022, 13:43Definitely a very good Heavyweight.
You don't win the title and defend it multiple times and be called average.
Some fans think that if a fighter is not top 10 all time they suck
If you look at a list of the all time greatest boxers. The guy that was the 1500th best of all time would still be a total badass by the standards of your average joe, and was probably a consistent Top 10 ranked guy in his own era at the very worst.
tiny_acres wrote: ↑28 Aug 2022, 10:02 Well this thread aged terribly. I still wonder if Kalan killed himself when Joshua lost to Ruiz or did the 2 Usyk losses finish him off with a heart attack?
Good point.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑28 Aug 2022, 19:06 olympic gold + unified world pro champ, top 5 for nearly his whole career, numerous victories over ranked contenders
well done aj. most of these cats we hype as prospects wont even come close to that![]()
Respect.Syntax Error wrote: ↑30 Aug 2022, 01:00Good point.margaret thatcher wrote: ↑28 Aug 2022, 19:06 olympic gold + unified world pro champ, top 5 for nearly his whole career, numerous victories over ranked contenders
well done aj. most of these cats we hype as prospects wont even come close to that![]()
You've got to give Joshua his due; even if he isn't the greatest HW ever, he's still better than most people who've ever laced up gloves and fought at the weight.
The phrase was Joshua is "a very good heavyweight" and I think that's unarguable.punchoutsb wrote: ↑28 Aug 2022, 14:44Depending on your era you can be good and do it though. John Ruiz managed it, for example, and I don’t think he was “very good” either. He was good, which is better than average. But for arguments sake, John Ruiz was absolutely elite when compared to the vast majority of boxers ever. But he typically isn’t compared with the guy ranked 128th in 1912…because of his time as a belt holder with multiple defenses he’d always have to be compared against the top guys in which case very good isn’t the right description. I know it’s semantics and subjective to each persons description and context though.tiny_acres wrote: ↑28 Aug 2022, 13:43Definitely a very good Heavyweight.
You don't win the title and defend it multiple times and be called average.
Some fans think that if a fighter is not top 10 all time they suck
Do you feel like a bit of a dick nowWuuupa wrote: ↑19 Dec 2018, 13:20 His technique is obviously not on the hemisphere of Ali, Louis or Tyson, even Povetkin was technicly superior to Aj. But he simply has Foreman kind of punching power, high speed and is tall and athletic and unlike Wilder Joshua can box and is not just a body builder with a strong punch.
fan of AJ much?Thomastearns wrote: ↑03 Sep 2022, 15:17 Joshua is still improving.
That alone is quite remarkable.
There's a lot to be said for the ability to keep learning, and Anthony Joshua has it.
After those 24 rounds with Usyk I expect AJ to blow anyone else away without too much sweat.
I'm not even too sure who else can give him a fight right now. After Usyk they'll all seem too slow and too easy to hit.
A bit like Don Bradman, the great Australian cricketer who after practicing using a stump to hit a golf ball in his youth then found a real cricket ball laughingly easy to hit with a bat.
oogiebe wrote: ↑03 Sep 2022, 22:59fan of AJ much?Thomastearns wrote: ↑03 Sep 2022, 15:17 Joshua is still improving.
That alone is quite remarkable.
There's a lot to be said for the ability to keep learning, and Anthony Joshua has it.
After those 24 rounds with Usyk I expect AJ to blow anyone else away without too much sweat.
I'm not even too sure who else can give him a fight right now. After Usyk they'll all seem too slow and too easy to hit.
A bit like Don Bradman, the great Australian cricketer who after practicing using a stump to hit a golf ball in his youth then found a real cricket ball laughingly easy to hit with a bat.![]()
Yeah, you love him.Thomastearns wrote: ↑04 Sep 2022, 11:46oogiebe wrote: ↑03 Sep 2022, 22:59fan of AJ much?Thomastearns wrote: ↑03 Sep 2022, 15:17 Joshua is still improving.
That alone is quite remarkable.
There's a lot to be said for the ability to keep learning, and Anthony Joshua has it.
After those 24 rounds with Usyk I expect AJ to blow anyone else away without too much sweat.
I'm not even too sure who else can give him a fight right now. After Usyk they'll all seem too slow and too easy to hit.
A bit like Don Bradman, the great Australian cricketer who after practicing using a stump to hit a golf ball in his youth then found a real cricket ball laughingly easy to hit with a bat.![]()
Anyone interested in HW boxing should be a fan seeing as how he's almost single handedly kept the HW scene interesting these past 6/7 years.
Take AJ out and it would have looked very ordinary indeed, wouldn't it?
Even as things stand, for me he's still the second best heavyweight out there and apart from the Parker and 2nd Ruiz fight all of his fights have been exciting.
It would be great to see him back out before the end of the year. However it now looks like he might have to sort out a few issues with his new trainer first.
Or find a new one.
I don't think he can go back to McCracken now.
Besides both his speed and conditioning looked a lot better against Usyk in the return.
https://talksport.com/sport/boxing/1125 ... k-rematch/
Agree. The second Uysk fight is the best I've seen him fight. He is still improving, unfortunately his best wasn't good enough to beat Uysk, but it would have been enough to beat anyone else on the night.Thomastearns wrote: ↑03 Sep 2022, 15:17 Joshua is still improving.
That alone is quite remarkable.
There's a lot to be said for the ability to keep learning, and Anthony Joshua has it.
After those 24 rounds with Usyk I expect AJ to blow anyone else away without too much sweat.
I'm not even too sure who else can give him a fight right now. After Usyk they'll all seem too slow and too easy to hit.
A bit like Don Bradman, the great Australian cricketer who after practicing using a stump to hit a golf ball in his youth then found a real cricket ball laughingly easy to hit with a bat.