DAZN policy on PPV

Spud
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

DAZN policy on PPV

Post by Spud »

Ffs .. talk about squeezing the last pound out of fans…

Joe Markowski of DAZN has confirmed to be able to purchase PPV fights on DAZN you have to be a subscriber.

Apologies if everyone already knew this
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32923
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: DAZN policy on PPV

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Is that the same guy who said Canelo - GGG 3 wouldn’t be PPV in the UK? :maybe:
tony1234
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2171
Joined: 15 Sep 2009, 10:02

Re: DAZN policy on PPV

Post by tony1234 »

Has anyone told him that people are skint now ?
maverick23
Cruiserweight
Posts: 10375
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20

Re: DAZN policy on PPV

Post by maverick23 »

Spud wrote: 16 Sep 2022, 13:44 Ffs .. talk about squeezing the last pound out of fans…

Joe Markowski of DAZN has confirmed to be able to purchase PPV fights on DAZN you have to be a subscriber.

Apologies if everyone already knew this
Yeah - but you don’t have to pay an additional month’s subs for it. You join and then pay £9.99 I think.

They do it in the hope that people don’t cancel afterwards.
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 103026
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: DAZN policy on PPV

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

maverick23 wrote: 16 Sep 2022, 14:07
Spud wrote: 16 Sep 2022, 13:44 Ffs .. talk about squeezing the last pound out of fans…

Joe Markowski of DAZN has confirmed to be able to purchase PPV fights on DAZN you have to be a subscriber.

Apologies if everyone already knew this
Yeah - but you don’t have to pay an additional month’s subs for it. You join and then pay £9.99 I think.

They do it in the hope that people don’t cancel afterwards.
Yeh. It’s £18 for non-subs.

So you have to sub and then add the PPV. You get the month.

May as well sub tomorrow then cus you’ll get the month.

If you already subs you just pay the £9.99..

I’m currently un-subbed.

When I go on the app, it says I need to sub for £7.99 then add the PPV as an add on for a extra 9.99.
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 103026
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: DAZN policy on PPV

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

lol

KiwiRider
Super Lightweight
Posts: 26621
Joined: 11 Feb 2017, 22:25

Re: DAZN policy on PPV

Post by KiwiRider »

Getting hammered on Twitter.
And rightly so.
DAZN said there would not be PPVs for subscribers.
Then there were PPVs.
Then they said this fight would not be PPV.
Now it is PPV.
Glad I cancelled. F*ck 'em.
veriton
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1598
Joined: 20 Dec 2009, 07:35

Re: DAZN policy on PPV

Post by veriton »

Ditched it as soon as they said PPV. It was a fairly cheap sub for mainly average content with the hope of some decent occasional top fights to justify the overall outlay. If they're asking to pay extra then it becomes pointless to subscribe.

That's partly because there is nothing else on there to watch - Bocksnaytion had Bunce's Boxing Hour and those long studio sessions alongside Lillis and Jones which were absolute quality. Dazn is woeful by comparison for analysis and content outside fight night. Still look back fondly on those mad Russian shows in the afternoon!
Nightmare Roy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16864
Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29

Re: DAZN policy on PPV

Post by Nightmare Roy »

It's a shambles, never subbed, never will. I saw another thread before about the different prices around the world £18 here but in the US $85! Are they considerably richer than us?
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23185
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: DAZN policy on PPV

Post by handsofstone »

Do you have to watch the show live or can you watch it whenever?
KiwiRider
Super Lightweight
Posts: 26621
Joined: 11 Feb 2017, 22:25

Re: DAZN policy on PPV

Post by KiwiRider »

Nightmare Roy wrote: 17 Sep 2022, 03:49 It's a shambles, never subbed, never will. I saw another thread before about the different prices around the world £18 here but in the US $85! Are they considerably richer than us?
It's the same with the PPVs!
They pay at least double, if not triple what other countries pay.
And the greedy bastards wonder why they get low numbers and people stealing streams :doh:
Nightmare Roy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16864
Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29

Re: DAZN policy on PPV

Post by Nightmare Roy »

KiwiRider wrote: 17 Sep 2022, 04:58
Nightmare Roy wrote: 17 Sep 2022, 03:49 It's a shambles, never subbed, never will. I saw another thread before about the different prices around the world £18 here but in the US $85! Are they considerably richer than us?
It's the same with the PPVs!
They pay at least double, if not triple what other countries pay.
And the greedy bastards wonder why they get low numbers and people stealing streams :doh:
Yeah that is the PPV price for a first time subscriber, I just cant believe they are willing to pay that much
Twinkle Toes
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3341
Joined: 22 Sep 2003, 08:38

Re: DAZN policy on PPV

Post by Twinkle Toes »

Hit my sub on the head after the Benn ppv was announced. There isn't enough Uk boxing for me.

Game changed!
Glass Joe
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 5005
Joined: 08 Feb 2012, 10:29

Re: DAZN policy on PPV

Post by Glass Joe »

KiwiRider wrote: 17 Sep 2022, 04:58
Nightmare Roy wrote: 17 Sep 2022, 03:49 It's a shambles, never subbed, never will. I saw another thread before about the different prices around the world £18 here but in the US $85! Are they considerably richer than us?
It's the same with the PPVs!
They pay at least double, if not triple what other countries pay.
And the greedy bastards wonder why they get low numbers and people stealing streams :doh:
Suppose in America it's a numbers game with that population. 500k buys is 42.5m revenue. Crazy if you pay for that alone and not in a group.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27504
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: DAZN policy on PPV

Post by stujones »

Its rediculous - I didn't subscribe to Dazn as I just not a fan of streaming, so perhaps I am not the right one to talk about it. However, Eddie's tone has changed so much in recent times over this - its gone from "PPV is dead" then it was "Dazn will not go PPV", then it was okay "Joshua needs to be on PPV but it will be a lot cheaper then other PPV channels" now its "Eubank Jnr vs Benn is the biggest fight in the UK" :doh: and now he is defending the absolute rip off price of GGG vs Canelo in the states by comparing it to Martin vs Ortiz. Yes, Martin vs Ortiz was a rip off but come on we are in an effing financial crisis - can't he see how much he is ripping off fans by going with the coin and DAZN. He categorically week in week out slated the price of US PPV - now his model are charging the same amount - and its on a shitty little stream and with very little additional extras to justify it.

Sports Fans / Boxing Fans aren't going to ditch a broadcaster who has offered the biggest free UK fight (well non PPV) IMO since the DAZN take over- Eubank vs Williams, the biggest non heavyweight domestic PPV - Khan vs Brook and the biggest global PPVs also - Joshua vs Usyk 1 and 2. Plus he makes bullshit accusations about BOTH GGG vs Canelo fights being on PPV - yes fight 2 was, but fight 1 was FREE for allegedly subscribers - it was just there for non subscribers and weirdly non subscribers could subscribe for a month and get the PPV included and it was cheaper than getting the PPV alone.

The coverage is shocking compared to the pomp of allegedly and we cannot say "well its £1.99" anymore.

Game freaking changed.
JamesPhilips
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 6553
Joined: 19 Mar 2021, 06:43

Re: DAZN policy on PPV

Post by JamesPhilips »

I wasnt gonna buy it until I saw this thread as I thought it would be £18 or whatever. But as I have DAZN it cost me a tenner. Not gonna stay up for it but will watch next morning. I have no interest in any undercard fight either.

I feel DAZN is decent value….. I cannot believe the US PPV prices some are like 80 dollars…madness
Spud
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: DAZN policy on PPV

Post by Spud »

Boxing is f*cked, full of greedy ****s.

But those of us who refuse to pay for the PPVs are in the extreme minority so the likes of Eddie doesn’t give a **** about us, as we dont affect his bank balance
daz74
Featherweight
Posts: 466
Joined: 02 Mar 2020, 18:09

Re: DAZN policy on PPV

Post by daz74 »

DAZN is good value, they’ve also got Triathlon which I’m into, and other extreme sports which are interesting. Re boxing they’re expanding with Canadian promotions too.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23066
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: DAZN policy on PPV

Post by mickey1975 »

daz74 wrote: 18 Sep 2022, 02:39 DAZN is good value, they’ve also got Triathlon which I’m into, and other extreme sports which are interesting. Re boxing they’re expanding with Canadian promotions too.
Dalton Smith in an easy knock over job 6 weeks ago isn't good value.
daz74
Featherweight
Posts: 466
Joined: 02 Mar 2020, 18:09

Re: DAZN policy on PPV

Post by daz74 »

mickey1975 wrote: 18 Sep 2022, 02:50
daz74 wrote: 18 Sep 2022, 02:39 DAZN is good value, they’ve also got Triathlon which I’m into, and other extreme sports which are interesting. Re boxing they’re expanding with Canadian promotions too.
Dalton Smith in an easy knock over job 6 weeks ago isn't good value.
Clearly if your interests are narrow then that will be the case.

PPV, Subscriptions, Broadband, TV Licence fee, ………… it’s all money that comes out of your bank account and judgements are made
tony galento
Cruiserweight
Posts: 33
Joined: 08 Apr 2011, 16:59

Re: DAZN policy on PPV

Post by tony galento »

I cancelled when i saw they had no less then 3 ppv’s lined up 2 or 3 weeks ago.

Haven’t paid for a ppv in years and wasn’t about to start here.

When you look at where edward was a few years ago at sky compared to where he is now i think you’d have to say it was a bad move jumping ship.

Without any premier league rights i’m predicting a setanta type capitulation in the next 18/24 months especially if canelo now goes elsewhere and big meech gets ironed out in december (if it happens).
Monzon83
Lightweight
Posts: 741
Joined: 13 May 2018, 21:03

Re: DAZN policy on PPV

Post by Monzon83 »

They can get stuffed i'm not subscribing then paying for a PPV. Will just stream it instead.

These jokers launched on the BS premise that streaming was the future and PPV was dead. They knew all along that was just a lie they were feeding the public to try and con them into subscribing.

They have the nerve to actually expect people to now forget that scam and just pay. They can go fornicate themselves.. :witzend:
KiwiRider
Super Lightweight
Posts: 26621
Joined: 11 Feb 2017, 22:25

Re: DAZN policy on PPV

Post by KiwiRider »

Monzon83 wrote: 20 Sep 2022, 19:58 They can get stuffed i'm not subscribing then paying for a PPV. Will just stream it instead.

These jokers launched on the BS premise that streaming was the future and PPV was dead. They knew all along that was just a lie they were feeding the public to try and con them into subscribing.

They have the nerve to actually expect people to now forget that scam and just pay. They can go fornicate themselves.. :witzend:
Here! Here! :salut:
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 103026
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: DAZN policy on PPV

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

KiwiRider wrote: 21 Sep 2022, 00:04
Monzon83 wrote: 20 Sep 2022, 19:58 They can get stuffed i'm not subscribing then paying for a PPV. Will just stream it instead.

These jokers launched on the BS premise that streaming was the future and PPV was dead. They knew all along that was just a lie they were feeding the public to try and con them into subscribing.

They have the nerve to actually expect people to now forget that scam and just pay. They can go fornicate themselves.. :witzend:
Here! Here! :salut:
Biggest joke in boxing in recent times.
Post Reply