Chris Eubank Jr. vs. Conor Benn | PPV - 26 April 2025

Who wins?

Poll ended at 26 Apr 2025, 16:40

Eubank - Decision
40
20%
Eubank - T/KO
126
64%
DRAW
4
2%
Benn - T/KO
19
10%
Benn - Decision
8
4%
 
Total votes: 197

Dioufy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7351
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 23:09

Re: Chris Eubank Jr. vs. Conor Benn | DAZN PPV - 8 October 2022

Post by Dioufy »

Holy shit
ThereByTheGrace
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4016
Joined: 04 Sep 2010, 05:22

Re: Chris Eubank Jr. vs. Conor Benn | DAZN PPV - 8 October 2022

Post by ThereByTheGrace »

I'm no surprised. People were saying it a while back
ThereByTheGrace
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4016
Joined: 04 Sep 2010, 05:22

Re: Chris Eubank Jr. vs. Conor Benn | DAZN PPV - 8 October 2022

Post by ThereByTheGrace »

The sun are reporting it now
THEBUTCH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6630
Joined: 27 Jan 2004, 08:51

Re: Chris Eubank Jr. vs. Conor Benn | DAZN PPV - 8 October 2022

Post by THEBUTCH »

Clomiphene !! Maybe boosting testosterone levels ???

Maybe the pill-popping experts on here can shed some light on this stuff :maybe:

It says this PED is banned in UFC so presumably boxing too !
garethhop
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1635
Joined: 16 Dec 2012, 18:00

Re: Chris Eubank Jr. vs. Conor Benn | DAZN PPV - 8 October 2022

Post by garethhop »

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/sport ... k-Jnr.html

Some kind of fudge incoming..........
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 100745
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Chris Eubank Jr. vs. Conor Benn | DAZN PPV - 8 October 2022

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

THEBUTCH wrote: 05 Oct 2022, 07:06 Clomiphene !! Maybe boosting testosterone levels ???

Maybe the pill-popping experts on here can shed some light on this stuff :maybe:

It says this PED is banned in UFC so presumably boxing too !
It's a women's drug..

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/sport ... k-Jnr.html

The substance, which is usually used to treat infertility in women but can increase testosterone in men, is prohibited by the World Anti-Doping Agency. It is understood Benn's test was carried out by the Voluntary Anti-Doping Association.

It is not yet clear whether Benn's situation will trigger a cancellation of this weekend's blockbuster with Eubank Jr, which falls almost 30 years after the second of two iconic fights between their fathers, Nigel Benn and Chris Eubank.

Sources say Eubank Jr still wants the bout to go ahead.

The fight is believed to be worth a six-figure fee to each fighter.

The British Boxing Board of Control, who are overseeing the fight, and Benn's promoter Eddie Hearn have been contacted for comment.
tony1234
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2148
Joined: 15 Sep 2009, 10:02

Re: Chris Eubank Jr. vs. Conor Benn | DAZN PPV - 8 October 2022

Post by tony1234 »

Surely it's off ? Now we know why Benn was happy with the weights if he was taking 'supplements'
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 100745
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Chris Eubank Jr. vs. Conor Benn | DAZN PPV - 8 October 2022

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

Remember when WBC removed Benn from their rankings because he didn't sign up?

In January, Benn, briefly removed from the WBC world rankings for failing to enrol in their clean-athlete programme.

At the time he said in a statement: 'The World Boxing Council (WBC) have temporarily removed me from their January rankings and have requested in order for me to continue being ranked under the WBC governing body I must officially enrol in the WBC Clean Boxing Program supported by VADA (Voluntary Anti-Doping Association).

'I can confirm I have instructed my team who are now in the process of enrolling me. I wanted to address this personally for the boxing community and my fans.

'It's important to me as a professional athlete to enrol in a clean testing programme and play my part in keeping our sport safe along with having my name stated in top five positions across all governing bodies.'
Dioufy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7351
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 23:09

Re: Chris Eubank Jr. vs. Conor Benn | DAZN PPV - 8 October 2022

Post by Dioufy »

Either he wanted to put on muscle mass or he wanted to give birth to a baby.

Please don’t judge unless we know which one.
tony1234
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2148
Joined: 15 Sep 2009, 10:02

Re: Chris Eubank Jr. vs. Conor Benn | DAZN PPV - 8 October 2022

Post by tony1234 »

Dioufy wrote: 05 Oct 2022, 07:14 Either he wanted to put on muscle mass or he wanted to give birth to a baby.

Please don’t judge unless we know which one.
He doesn't look pregnant to me
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 100745
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Chris Eubank Jr. vs. Conor Benn | DAZN PPV - 8 October 2022

Post by Ruthless-RKO »



Upcoming!
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 100745
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Chris Eubank Jr. vs. Conor Benn | DAZN PPV - 8 October 2022

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

The media work out is later today as well
1103924
Super Flyweight
Posts: 127
Joined: 24 Sep 2022, 09:10

Re: Chris Eubank Jr. vs. Conor Benn | DAZN PPV - 8 October 2022

Post by 1103924 »

Ruthless-RKO wrote: 05 Oct 2022, 07:20

Upcoming!
He's going to tell us the fight is still on.
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 100745
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Chris Eubank Jr. vs. Conor Benn | DAZN PPV - 8 October 2022

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

forcefraser
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5429
Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15

Re: Chris Eubank Jr. vs. Conor Benn | DAZN PPV - 8 October 2022

Post by forcefraser »

This fight ain't happening. Had a feeling this would not happen.

Poor old Eddie
Verdi
Welterweight
Posts: 819
Joined: 12 Apr 2016, 18:08

Re: Chris Eubank Jr. vs. Conor Benn | DAZN PPV - 8 October 2022

Post by Verdi »

That drug is used in post cycle therapy. Daft twat.
garethhop
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1635
Joined: 16 Dec 2012, 18:00

Re: Chris Eubank Jr. vs. Conor Benn | DAZN PPV - 8 October 2022

Post by garethhop »

Fight is still on. Lawyers involved. 'Old' test. A negative sample has been returned - TalkSport.

What a mess.
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 100745
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Chris Eubank Jr. vs. Conor Benn | DAZN PPV - 8 October 2022

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

Dioufy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7351
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 23:09

Re: Chris Eubank Jr. vs. Conor Benn | DAZN PPV - 8 October 2022

Post by Dioufy »

Failed VADA
passed UKAD
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32661
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Chris Eubank Jr. vs. Conor Benn | DAZN PPV - 8 October 2022

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Boxerbeetle wrote: 10 Aug 2022, 06:00 Conor’s going to be roided to the gills for this one :lol:
:geek:
TheLeprechaun
Middleweight
Posts: 5137
Joined: 27 Jun 2013, 20:42

Re: Chris Eubank Jr. vs. Conor Benn | DAZN PPV - 8 October 2022

Post by TheLeprechaun »

It's a drug that is used AFTER a cycle usually, so that you don't get gyno.

Amateur hour getting caught like that. Fighters are experts at not getting caught. He's now officially a drugs cheat. I'm just looking forward to the excuse they come up with. Galahads story was that his brother spiked him :lol:
garethhop
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1635
Joined: 16 Dec 2012, 18:00

Re: Chris Eubank Jr. vs. Conor Benn | DAZN PPV - 8 October 2022

Post by garethhop »

Kalle - "There has been a trace finding in a voluntary testing scheme' (end August/beginning of September).

UKAD tests are negative.

They want to go ahead. Eubank and Benn spoke directly to each other.

Clear as day as what has been going on here.
Gran Hermano
Lightweight
Posts: 251
Joined: 23 Oct 2017, 10:27

Re: Chris Eubank Jr. vs. Conor Benn | DAZN PPV - 8 October 2022

Post by Gran Hermano »

Still on it seems
tony1234
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2148
Joined: 15 Sep 2009, 10:02

Re: Chris Eubank Jr. vs. Conor Benn | DAZN PPV - 8 October 2022

Post by tony1234 »

Why don't they test the B sample then ? Get a definitive answer , otherwise it is farcical
garethhop
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1635
Joined: 16 Dec 2012, 18:00

Re: Chris Eubank Jr. vs. Conor Benn | DAZN PPV - 8 October 2022

Post by garethhop »

Ruthless-RKO wrote: 05 Oct 2022, 07:26
They just read out that on Talksport and Kalle said it was the first time he heard it. Even though it's been cleared by Wasserman.

Things are clearly moving fast.
Post Reply