Tyson Fury vs. Derek Chisora III | BT PPV - 3 December 2022
-
polecateddy
- Heavyweight

Re: Fury vs Chisora III is on (apparently)
Lewis fought Frans Botha I suppose, but this is pretty thin stuff. How much would he get paid for this nonsense?
Re: Fury vs Chisora III is on (apparently)
Hoping less than 10k buy a ticket to this event.
Re: Fury vs Chisora III is on (apparently)
yes but look who Lewis fought immediately before and after Botha.polecateddy wrote: ↑09 Oct 2022, 09:01 Lewis fought Frans Botha I suppose, but this is pretty thin stuff. How much would he get paid for this nonsense?
-
jamesmcdonnell
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 45213
- Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11
Re: Fury vs Chisora III is on (apparently)
Nobody except brainless Fury fanboys will buy this Utter tripe.
Pathetic.
Pathetic.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 22936
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Fury vs Chisora III is on (apparently)
And my comment on arreola been lined up for AJ was ignored...
-
big lennox
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2550
- Joined: 06 Feb 2004, 13:44
Re: Fury vs Chisora III is on (apparently)
Joshua has boxed Uysk twice, and Fury has never boxed anyone anywhere near as good as Uysk. Plus, AJ hasn't boxed Arreola twice before already..which Fury has done with Chisora
-
The Asleep Lamps
- Welterweight
- Posts: 721
- Joined: 07 Sep 2015, 11:18
Re: Fury vs Chisora III is on (apparently)
He should have faced a leftie to prepare for Usyk. That would have made more sense. Then you say OK I see what he is doing there.... I don't think the Chisora fight is finalized yet though. Hopefully they will change their minds over the weekend.
Re: Fury vs Chisora III is on (apparently)
of course its on - was always going to be chiso .
the AJ story was just more BS from the Gobshite
the AJ story was just more BS from the Gobshite
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 22936
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Fury vs Chisora III is on (apparently)
He did say that was an option.The Asleep Lamps wrote: ↑09 Oct 2022, 11:13 He should have faced a leftie to prepare for Usyk. That would have made more sense. Then you say OK I see what he is doing there.... I don't think the Chisora fight is finalized yet though. Hopefully they will change their minds over the weekend.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 22936
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Fury vs Chisora III is on (apparently)
So you think it's ppv worthy?big lennox wrote: ↑09 Oct 2022, 10:55Joshua has boxed Uysk twice, and Fury has never boxed anyone anywhere near as good as Uysk. Plus, AJ hasn't boxed Arreola twice before already..which Fury has done with Chisora
-
big lennox
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2550
- Joined: 06 Feb 2004, 13:44
Re: Fury vs Chisora III is on (apparently)
Definitely not PPV worthy. I actually don't think he needs to drop down to this level. A rematch with Whyte would have been good. Ditto, Fury, it doesn't make sense to me him not waiting for Uysk in February.mickey1975 wrote: ↑09 Oct 2022, 12:04So you think it's ppv worthy?big lennox wrote: ↑09 Oct 2022, 10:55Joshua has boxed Uysk twice, and Fury has never boxed anyone anywhere near as good as Uysk. Plus, AJ hasn't boxed Arreola twice before already..which Fury has done with Chisora
I like both Joshua and Fury: I think fundamentally they are good guys and I always watch their fights, but even if Joshua vs Arreola and Fury vs Chisora III aren't pay per view, I won't watch them live; will just catch the highlights on YouTube a few days later. Just not interested in either of these fights.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 22936
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Fury vs Chisora III is on (apparently)
But using your criteria, AJ can never box Usyk again, won't box Tyson (his sponsors won't let him) so has to step down.big lennox wrote: ↑09 Oct 2022, 12:40Definitely not PPV worthy. I actually don't think he needs to drop down to this level. A rematch with Whyte would have been good. Ditto, Fury, it doesn't make sense to me him not waiting for Uysk in February.mickey1975 wrote: ↑09 Oct 2022, 12:04So you think it's ppv worthy?big lennox wrote: ↑09 Oct 2022, 10:55
Joshua has boxed Uysk twice, and Fury has never boxed anyone anywhere near as good as Uysk. Plus, AJ hasn't boxed Arreola twice before already..which Fury has done with Chisora
I like both Joshua and Fury: I think fundamentally they are good guys and I always watch their fights, but even if Joshua vs Arreola and Fury vs Chisora III aren't pay per view, I won't watch them live; will just catch the highlights on YouTube a few days later. Just not interested in either of these fights.
-
Ruthless-RKO
- Welterweight
- Posts: 100697
- Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59
Re: Tyson Fury vs. Derek Chisora III - Who wins?
This right here..
Just shows what Fury is.
He’s such a good talker.
-
Ruthless-RKO
- Welterweight
- Posts: 100697
- Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59
Re: Tyson Fury vs. Derek Chisora III - Who wins?
It’s been rumoured that Cacace will defend his IBO bet against Dilmaghani on the Fury undercard.
-
big lennox
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2550
- Joined: 06 Feb 2004, 13:44
Re: Fury vs Chisora III is on (apparently)
There is a big difference between boxing Uysk again and Chisora for a third time. We already know the result of Fury vs Chisora. Why doesn't Fury box Joyce: same promoter, very easy to make.mickey1975 wrote: ↑09 Oct 2022, 13:11But using your criteria, AJ can never box Usyk again, won't box Tyson (his sponsors won't let him) so has to step down.big lennox wrote: ↑09 Oct 2022, 12:40Definitely not PPV worthy. I actually don't think he needs to drop down to this level. A rematch with Whyte would have been good. Ditto, Fury, it doesn't make sense to me him not waiting for Uysk in February.
I like both Joshua and Fury: I think fundamentally they are good guys and I always watch their fights, but even if Joshua vs Arreola and Fury vs Chisora III aren't pay per view, I won't watch them live; will just catch the highlights on YouTube a few days later. Just not interested in either of these fights.
Fury is one of the few fighters that can match Joyce for fitness. I don't know how a 6 ft 9 guy can have such stamina but he does, which is a remarkable skill to have.
Last edited by big lennox on 09 Oct 2022, 15:15, edited 1 time in total.
-
The Asleep Lamps
- Welterweight
- Posts: 721
- Joined: 07 Sep 2015, 11:18
Re: Fury vs Chisora III is on (apparently)
Send this to Fury.
Re: Tyson Fury vs. Derek Chisora III - Who wins?
I feel you.Counter-puncher wrote: ↑08 Oct 2022, 07:43 fvck this sh1t they're virtually all dead to me. I'll bother with Bam, and Estrada and Chocolatito while they're still around. I'm interested in Haney's development, will have to wait to see if Shakur's weight problems were deep rooted discipline and lifestyle issues or just weight issues, hopefully the latter. Canelo I'll always watch if he takes on a challenge, Usyk same.
Other than that, Crawford and Spence can fvck off, they killed it for me, and I don't think I can think of another boxer I could GAF about. that astounds me, that I'm able to say that, that I give a fvck about 7 fighters in the whole world (may have missed a couple tbf), I mean I love Inoue but where have the good matches been for the last 2 years?
fvck boxing.
It's horrid and difficult to know why I'm so into at times. WC too - and you're gonna miss that.
Everything is sh1t and tainted.
-
golden_labrador
- Super Bantamweight
- Posts: 1752
- Joined: 25 Dec 2020, 18:18
Re: Fury vs Chisora III is on (apparently)
Fury-Joyce I’d even pay to go in person (if in UK)
Re: Fury vs Chisora III is on (apparently)
I'd buy PPV for this one i would'nt want to risk a stream going down , same with Fury -Usyk , this one i won't even gbother watching it on u tube a week later ,
-
golden_labrador
- Super Bantamweight
- Posts: 1752
- Joined: 25 Dec 2020, 18:18
Re: Fury vs Chisora III is on (apparently)
yeah this supposed match reeks of Fury and Chisora sitting on leather sofas smoking cigars reminiscing over old times and counting their money. virtually an exhibition with lots of fake WWE beef in the build-up.
Re: Fury vs Chisora III is on (apparently)
Not the best of fights BUT understandable considering he's lost 3 of his last 5 , and got beat quite convicincly in his last two ,,, Whats Your hero's excuse , he's won his last 5 , so whats his excuse for fighting his mate ,, and Chisors is his mate take no notice of all the WWF bollocks they have been at for the last couple of months ,, suspect its been Chisora all along ,
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 22936
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Fury vs Chisora III is on (apparently)
I don't have a hero, most grown men don't. I understand you won't understand that, what with your bikes, etc.coneye wrote: ↑10 Oct 2022, 05:34Not the best of fights BUT understandable considering he's lost 3 of his last 5 , and got beat quite convicincly in his last two ,,, Whats Your hero's excuse , he's won his last 5 , so whats his excuse for fighting his mate ,, and Chisors is his mate take no notice of all the WWF bollocks they have been at for the last couple of months ,, suspect its been Chisora all along ,
-
polecateddy
- Heavyweight

Re: Fury vs Chisora III is on (apparently)
Yes I wasn’t going to labour the point, but Lewis did a great job demo-img how champs should act. What was it 6 weeks after popping Michael Grant’s bubble, polaxed Botha in 2.1047945 wrote: ↑09 Oct 2022, 09:18yes but look who Lewis fought immediately before and after Botha.polecateddy wrote: ↑09 Oct 2022, 09:01 Lewis fought Frans Botha I suppose, but this is pretty thin stuff. How much would he get paid for this nonsense?
Re: Fury vs Chisora III is on (apparently)
only a clown or an american would try and fault Lennox Lewis`s resume .polecateddy wrote: ↑10 Oct 2022, 08:40Yes I wasn’t going to labour the point, but Lewis did a great job demo-img how champs should act. What was it 6 weeks after popping Michael Grant’s bubble, polaxed Botha in 2.1047945 wrote: ↑09 Oct 2022, 09:18yes but look who Lewis fought immediately before and after Botha.polecateddy wrote: ↑09 Oct 2022, 09:01 Lewis fought Frans Botha I suppose, but this is pretty thin stuff. How much would he get paid for this nonsense?