Round-by-Round: Savannah Marshall vs. Claressa Shields | Sky Sports - 15 October 2022

For RBR threads only
Verdi
Welterweight
Posts: 819
Joined: 12 Apr 2016, 18:08

Re: Round-by-Round: Savannah Marshall vs. Claressa Shields | Sky Sports - 15 October 2022

Post by Verdi »

Shields is clearly the more skilled fighter, her speed and timing are way above Marshalls.
qatarm
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 316
Joined: 18 Jul 2009, 15:04

Re: Round-by-Round: Savannah Marshall vs. Claressa Shields | Sky Sports - 15 October 2022

Post by qatarm »

Ruthless-RKO wrote: 15 Oct 2022, 18:17 2 min rounds are crap
Amen
Grilling Machine
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3152
Joined: 16 Sep 2005, 02:28

Re: Round-by-Round: Savannah Marshall vs. Claressa Shields | Sky Sports - 15 October 2022

Post by Grilling Machine »

Draw for me. Obviously in the minority here. Deserved rematch.
giacomino
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15471
Joined: 14 Dec 2007, 19:33

Re: Round-by-Round: Savannah Marshall vs. Claressa Shields | Sky Sports - 15 October 2022

Post by giacomino »

Should be 100-90 or 99-91 Shields but probably a SD for Marshall
Dioufy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7351
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 23:09

Re: Round-by-Round: Savannah Marshall vs. Claressa Shields | Sky Sports - 15 October 2022

Post by Dioufy »

A pretty conclusive 97-93 for me. SM won her rounds on workrate and not quality.
Slow heavy-handed plodder got found out at elite level tonight.
No shame in that.
cormack
Super Featherweight
Posts: 2965
Joined: 30 May 2019, 07:13

Re: Round-by-Round: Savannah Marshall vs. Claressa Shields | Sky Sports - 15 October 2022

Post by cormack »

a bit dissapointed in marshall TBH
sheilds did the better work and should take the belts home .
where was the power ...
golden_labrador
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 1751
Joined: 25 Dec 2020, 18:18

Re: Round-by-Round: Savannah Marshall vs. Claressa Shields | Sky Sports - 15 October 2022

Post by golden_labrador »

Shields is tough and GWOAT
skanksta
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16791
Joined: 17 Oct 2008, 10:25

Re: Round-by-Round: Savannah Marshall vs. Claressa Shields | Sky Sports - 15 October 2022

Post by skanksta »

CS 5-4-1.
Sav came back strongly after looking out of her depth.
Good fight....
garethhop
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1635
Joined: 16 Dec 2012, 18:00

Re: Round-by-Round: Savannah Marshall vs. Claressa Shields | Sky Sports - 15 October 2022

Post by garethhop »

Two brilliant performances in different ways.

Lets go 97-93.

Great stuff.
Last edited by garethhop on 15 Oct 2022, 18:19, edited 1 time in total.
gregregegg
Lightweight
Posts: 9142
Joined: 29 Sep 2017, 04:08

Re: Round-by-Round: Savannah Marshall vs. Claressa Shields | Sky Sports - 15 October 2022

Post by gregregegg »

Absolutely fair play to both. Shields won, wide and clear in my eyes.

Would love to see a rematch with 3 min rounds.
JxhDel.
Lightweight
Posts: 2512
Joined: 14 Dec 2017, 05:28

Re: Round-by-Round: Savannah Marshall vs. Claressa Shields | Sky Sports - 15 October 2022

Post by JxhDel. »

97 - 93 CS.
Kilburn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6565
Joined: 25 Jul 2002, 07:27

Re: Round-by-Round: Savannah Marshall vs. Claressa Shields | Sky Sports - 15 October 2022

Post by Kilburn »

Marshall land some shots up close but Shields always came back with an answer.

Very impressive from the American. One tough lady.
blanca
Middleweight
Posts: 1868
Joined: 21 May 2014, 13:15

Re: Round-by-Round: Savannah Marshall vs. Claressa Shields | Sky Sports - 15 October 2022

Post by blanca »

Grilling Machine wrote: 15 Oct 2022, 18:18 Draw for me. Obviously in the minority here. Deserved rematch.
You are IJL and I claim my £5 🤣🤣
skanksta
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16791
Joined: 17 Oct 2008, 10:25

Re: Round-by-Round: Savannah Marshall vs. Claressa Shields | Sky Sports - 15 October 2022

Post by skanksta »

CS deserves it, but a draw would be "good for business"....
maverick23
Cruiserweight
Posts: 10375
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20

Re: Round-by-Round: Savannah Marshall vs. Claressa Shields | Sky Sports - 15 October 2022

Post by maverick23 »

99-91 CS. Claressa’s just too quick and skilful for Savannah I think and Savannah couldn’t have put anymore into it.

Perhaps if Savannah had fought more quality fighters before this it would have helped but she stepped up about 4 levels tonight.
Grilling Machine
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3152
Joined: 16 Sep 2005, 02:28

Re: Round-by-Round: Savannah Marshall vs. Claressa Shields | Sky Sports - 15 October 2022

Post by Grilling Machine »

Rematch with 3-min rounds. That's what it needs.
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 100664
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Round-by-Round: Savannah Marshall vs. Claressa Shields | Sky Sports - 15 October 2022

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

96-94
97-93
97-93

Clarissa Shields
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 100664
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Round-by-Round: Savannah Marshall vs. Claressa Shields | Sky Sports - 15 October 2022

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

skanksta wrote: 15 Oct 2022, 18:19 CS deserves it, but a draw would be "good for business"....
CS just started too fast.

Sav probably didn’t expect it.

Rematch on US please. 3 min rounds please.
ewenhay
Middleweight
Posts: 2902
Joined: 12 Oct 2013, 16:28

Re: Round-by-Round: Savannah Marshall vs. Claressa Shields | Sky Sports - 15 October 2022

Post by ewenhay »

8_2 Shields

Can't believe anyone has that close
skanksta
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16791
Joined: 17 Oct 2008, 10:25

Re: Round-by-Round: Savannah Marshall vs. Claressa Shields | Sky Sports - 15 October 2022

Post by skanksta »

Seems fair, "close but clear" UD.
96-94, 97-93 x2 :TU:
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 22982
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Round-by-Round: Savannah Marshall vs. Claressa Shields | Sky Sports - 15 October 2022

Post by handsofstone »

Correct decision, Marshall outclassed in every department, even power and trading
JxhDel.
Lightweight
Posts: 2512
Joined: 14 Dec 2017, 05:28

Re: Round-by-Round: Savannah Marshall vs. Claressa Shields | Sky Sports - 15 October 2022

Post by JxhDel. »

We need btw 3 minutes rounds for female boxing, whatever the 8/10/12 formula because it leaves decisive stuff hanging.
Post Reply