RJJ at Heavy

keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16895
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

RJJ at Heavy

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Which lineal heavyweight champions do you think he would beat?
Teddy's Toupee
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2903
Joined: 25 Sep 2010, 17:37

Re: RJJ at Heavy

Post by Teddy's Toupee »

Sullivan, Corbett, Fitzsimmons, Jefferies, Hart, Burns, Willard, Dempsey, Schemling, Sharkey, Carnera, Braddock, Johansson, Spinks(Leon), Muhammad Ali(3), Rahman.
SteveO
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1383
Joined: 31 Dec 2001, 20:00

Re: RJJ at Heavy

Post by SteveO »

None
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11173
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: RJJ at Heavy

Post by Ezzard »

Hart, Burns, Carnera... Those are his best and only chances.
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39271
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: RJJ at Heavy

Post by margaret thatcher »

beats a lot of the earliest champs
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39271
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: RJJ at Heavy

Post by margaret thatcher »

Ezzard wrote: 09 Nov 2022, 15:29 Hart, Burns, Carnera... Those are his best and only chances.
no chance against soaking weight 165 pound bob fitz? willard? neon leon? rahman?
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16895
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: RJJ at Heavy

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Teddy's Toupee wrote: 09 Nov 2022, 12:30 Dempsey,
Is nothing sacred, brother? If you put Jones in a time machine back to the 1919, with no PEDs, a simple diet, the hot sun and Dempey with his killer instinct, I don't think Roy could cope.
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39271
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: RJJ at Heavy

Post by margaret thatcher »

are we talking about the roy jones who actually existed, or a fictional one we make various changes to based on the era his opponent fought
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16895
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: RJJ at Heavy

Post by keithmoonhangover »

margaret thatcher wrote: 09 Nov 2022, 15:45 are we talking about the roy jones who actually existed, or a fictional one we make various changes to based on the era his opponent fought
The Jones that fought Ruiz. :TU:
Teddy's Toupee
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2903
Joined: 25 Sep 2010, 17:37

Re: RJJ at Heavy

Post by Teddy's Toupee »

keithmoonhangover wrote: 09 Nov 2022, 16:11
margaret thatcher wrote: 09 Nov 2022, 15:45 are we talking about the roy jones who actually existed, or a fictional one we make various changes to based on the era his opponent fought
The Jones that fought Ruiz. :TU:
Beats Dempsey.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16895
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: RJJ at Heavy

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Teddy's Toupee wrote: 09 Nov 2022, 16:22
keithmoonhangover wrote: 09 Nov 2022, 16:11
margaret thatcher wrote: 09 Nov 2022, 15:45 are we talking about the roy jones who actually existed, or a fictional one we make various changes to based on the era his opponent fought
The Jones that fought Ruiz. :TU:
Beats Dempsey.
:shame:
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11173
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: RJJ at Heavy

Post by Ezzard »

margaret thatcher wrote: 09 Nov 2022, 15:33
Ezzard wrote: 09 Nov 2022, 15:29 Hart, Burns, Carnera... Those are his best and only chances.
no chance against soaking weight 165 pound bob fitz? willard? neon leon? rahman?
Without the juice Fitz sparks him. Maybe even with the juice. Don't see Jones going 45 rounds with Willard. Rahman needs just one right hand.,
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11173
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: RJJ at Heavy

Post by Ezzard »

Dempsey is way too much for him.
Wee Tommy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: RJJ at Heavy

Post by Wee Tommy »

margaret thatcher wrote: 09 Nov 2022, 15:45 are we talking about the roy jones who actually existed, or a fictional one we make various changes to based on the era his opponent fought
🤣👍🏼
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13879
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: RJJ at Heavy

Post by DrDuke »

He would beat the majority of fighters up to the Dempsey times. Jack would have a too good delivery of his huge power, so it's a bad matchup for Roy.

Then he could deal with the mix of champs between Tunney and Louis. Although Baer would also have a solid puncher's chance.

In the later times he would beat Leon Spinks and Shannon Briggs, maybe also Michael Spinks and George Foreman of the 90s (if not got caught).
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16895
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: RJJ at Heavy

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Teddy's Toupee wrote: 09 Nov 2022, 16:22
keithmoonhangover wrote: 09 Nov 2022, 16:11
margaret thatcher wrote: 09 Nov 2022, 15:45 are we talking about the roy jones who actually existed, or a fictional one we make various changes to based on the era his opponent fought
The Jones that fought Ruiz. :TU:
Beats Dempsey.
What about Dempsey on juice, now that is a scary thought.
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13879
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: RJJ at Heavy

Post by DrDuke »

keithmoonhangover wrote: 10 Nov 2022, 06:28
Teddy's Toupee wrote: 09 Nov 2022, 16:22
keithmoonhangover wrote: 09 Nov 2022, 16:11

The Jones that fought Ruiz. :TU:
Beats Dempsey.
What about Dempsey on juice, now that is a scary thought.
Mike Tyson.
Teddy's Toupee
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2903
Joined: 25 Sep 2010, 17:37

Re: RJJ at Heavy

Post by Teddy's Toupee »

keithmoonhangover wrote: 10 Nov 2022, 06:28
Teddy's Toupee wrote: 09 Nov 2022, 16:22
keithmoonhangover wrote: 09 Nov 2022, 16:11

The Jones that fought Ruiz. :TU:
Beats Dempsey.
What about Dempsey on juice, now that is a scary thought.
Makes no difference. He defence was just too crude to compete with more modern boxers. He'd get outboxed and probably stopped by every lineal heavyweight champ after and including Joe Louis.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16895
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: RJJ at Heavy

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Teddy's Toupee wrote: 10 Nov 2022, 10:27
keithmoonhangover wrote: 10 Nov 2022, 06:28
Teddy's Toupee wrote: 09 Nov 2022, 16:22

Beats Dempsey.
What about Dempsey on juice, now that is a scary thought.
Makes no difference. He defence was just too crude to compete with more modern boxers. He'd get outboxed and probably stopped by every lineal heavyweight champ after and including Joe Louis.
He decked the highly skilled Gene Tunney, so he would be in with the slicksters. I would pick him over Charles, Walcott, Marciano, Patterson, Ingo, Neon Leon and Rahman. I would even give him a shot against Fury, if Wilder the Windmill could knock him down numerous time, there's no reason Jack couldn't and if it was before the eight count, he would put Fury down permanently.
Teddy's Toupee
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2903
Joined: 25 Sep 2010, 17:37

Re: RJJ at Heavy

Post by Teddy's Toupee »

keithmoonhangover wrote: 10 Nov 2022, 10:54
Teddy's Toupee wrote: 10 Nov 2022, 10:27
keithmoonhangover wrote: 10 Nov 2022, 06:28

What about Dempsey on juice, now that is a scary thought.
Makes no difference. He defence was just too crude to compete with more modern boxers. He'd get outboxed and probably stopped by every lineal heavyweight champ after and including Joe Louis.
He decked the highly skilled Gene Tunney, so he would be in with the slicksters. I would pick him over Charles, Walcott, Marciano, Patterson, Ingo, Neon Leon and Rahman. I would even give him a shot against Fury, if Wilder the Windmill could knock him down numerous time, there's no reason Jack couldn't and if it was before the eight count, he would put Fury down permanently.
Tunney wasn't highly skilled, he was just one of the first old-timers to utilise effectively that modern day staple the jab.
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11173
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: RJJ at Heavy

Post by Ezzard »

If Dempsey's left hook missed Jones the breeze from the shot would drop Roy.
Teddy's Toupee
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2903
Joined: 25 Sep 2010, 17:37

Re: RJJ at Heavy

Post by Teddy's Toupee »

Ezzard wrote: 10 Nov 2022, 11:13 If Dempsey's left hook missed Jones the breeze from the shot would drop Roy.
No it woudn't.
Ambling Alp II
Super Middleweight
Posts: 15185
Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31

Re: RJJ at Heavy

Post by Ambling Alp II »

Teddy's Toupee wrote: 10 Nov 2022, 11:03
keithmoonhangover wrote: 10 Nov 2022, 10:54
Teddy's Toupee wrote: 10 Nov 2022, 10:27
Makes no difference. He defence was just too crude to compete with more modern boxers. He'd get outboxed and probably stopped by every lineal heavyweight champ after and including Joe Louis.
He decked the highly skilled Gene Tunney, so he would be in with the slicksters. I would pick him over Charles, Walcott, Marciano, Patterson, Ingo, Neon Leon and Rahman. I would even give him a shot against Fury, if Wilder the Windmill could knock him down numerous time, there's no reason Jack couldn't and if it was before the eight count, he would put Fury down permanently.
Tunney wasn't highly skilled, he was just one of the first old-timers to utilise effectively that modern day staple the jab.
You have to be kidding.
Teddy's Toupee
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2903
Joined: 25 Sep 2010, 17:37

Re: RJJ at Heavy

Post by Teddy's Toupee »

Ambling Alp II wrote: 10 Nov 2022, 12:15
Teddy's Toupee wrote: 10 Nov 2022, 11:03
keithmoonhangover wrote: 10 Nov 2022, 10:54

He decked the highly skilled Gene Tunney, so he would be in with the slicksters. I would pick him over Charles, Walcott, Marciano, Patterson, Ingo, Neon Leon and Rahman. I would even give him a shot against Fury, if Wilder the Windmill could knock him down numerous time, there's no reason Jack couldn't and if it was before the eight count, he would put Fury down permanently.
Tunney wasn't highly skilled, he was just one of the first old-timers to utilise effectively that modern day staple the jab.
You have to be kidding.
No.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16895
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: RJJ at Heavy

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Teddy's Toupee wrote: 10 Nov 2022, 11:03
keithmoonhangover wrote: 10 Nov 2022, 10:54
Teddy's Toupee wrote: 10 Nov 2022, 10:27
Makes no difference. He defence was just too crude to compete with more modern boxers. He'd get outboxed and probably stopped by every lineal heavyweight champ after and including Joe Louis.
He decked the highly skilled Gene Tunney, so he would be in with the slicksters. I would pick him over Charles, Walcott, Marciano, Patterson, Ingo, Neon Leon and Rahman. I would even give him a shot against Fury, if Wilder the Windmill could knock him down numerous time, there's no reason Jack couldn't and if it was before the eight count, he would put Fury down permanently.
Tunney wasn't highly skilled, he was just one of the first old-timers to utilise effectively that modern day staple the jab.
Ha'way man Teddy. Tunney was the consummate boxer.
Post Reply