Nathan Gorman - Is that it?

rhino222
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6616
Joined: 09 Sep 2005, 09:38

Nathan Gorman - Is that it?

Post by rhino222 »

I saw Wardley v Gorman as a real 50/50 pick 'em

What surprised me was that Gorman, despite loads of notice had seemingly not got himself in the best of condition and was carrying a lot of excess.

Did that mean Gorman couldnt motivate himself for a career defining British title tilt?

Therefore, Is it all over for Nathan?

He has a decent skill set but i feel he should have tried to 'box' Wardley and not just have a shoot out with him.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17039
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Nathan Gorman - Is that it?

Post by keithmoonhangover »

rhino222 wrote: 27 Nov 2022, 15:45 I saw Wardley v Gorman as a real 50/50 pick 'em

What surprised me was that Gorman, despite loads of notice had seemingly not got himself in the best of condition and was carrying a lot of excess.

Did that mean Gorman couldnt motivate himself for a career defining British title tilt?

Therefore, Is it all over for Nathan?

He has a decent skill set but i feel he should have tried to 'box' Wardley and not just have a shoot out with him.
Turns out all gypsies aren't natural boxers.
Glass Joe
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 5005
Joined: 08 Feb 2012, 10:29

Re: Nathan Gorman - Is that it?

Post by Glass Joe »

It wouldn't surprise me if Gorman hanged up his gloves. Surprised he's only 26. Feels like he will always get poled axed whenever he fights a hungry contender
Twinkle Toes
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3341
Joined: 22 Sep 2003, 08:38

Re: Nathan Gorman - Is that it?

Post by Twinkle Toes »

He isn't motivated enough to get in shape. Has enough boxing skill to compete at a decent level but not in his current shape.
maverick23
Cruiserweight
Posts: 10375
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20

Re: Nathan Gorman - Is that it?

Post by maverick23 »

I think he possibly should walk away. The biggest issue for me isn’t so much his shape/fitness (whilst it is still a problem), it’s that he didn’t seem to have the heart for it.

He’s got some skills but doesn’t shift many tickets and is someone that I can’t see a promoter wanting to build up again. He’s probably too good to be used against guys like Adeleye/Fisher and anyone at a higher level that can punch will take him out without much fuss.

Unless he gets himself into better shape and gets a good win in the away corner then I struggle to see where he goes from here.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17039
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Nathan Gorman - Is that it?

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Isn't he just another hype job with a padded record?
dookus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4488
Joined: 17 May 2005, 06:00

Re: Nathan Gorman - Is that it?

Post by dookus »

As I said elsewhere, lovely skills and can punch a bit, but hard to see how he goes anywhere with that punch resistance and conditioning. It's strange, he always seems clear eyed but just can't stand up to power shots above a certain level.
rhino222
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6616
Joined: 09 Sep 2005, 09:38

Re: Nathan Gorman - Is that it?

Post by rhino222 »

keithmoonhangover wrote: 27 Nov 2022, 16:29 Isn't he just another hype job with a padded record?
i dont think so, he just has a bit too much talent to be cannon fodder
Dioufy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7351
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 23:09

Re: Nathan Gorman - Is that it?

Post by Dioufy »

Gorman is just weird. Obviously very talented…. but he has the traits of a bully in the ring. If he doesn’t get you out and you stand up and fight back he will fold.
Fabio was hurt. Then showed balls to fight back and NG just capitulated. His corner know him very well and probably sensed what was going to happen.
Just can’t see this version being of 270lbs NG going anywhere beyond British level.
Thomas Salek rematch.
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11806
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: Nathan Gorman - Is that it?

Post by Old bones Ian »

There's been a lot of boxers with better wins on their record without getting a shot at the British title, let alone 2 shots.
Gorman has been disappointing in both attempts, I'm not sure where he goes from here
TheLeprechaun
Super Middleweight
Posts: 5166
Joined: 27 Jun 2013, 20:42

Re: Nathan Gorman - Is that it?

Post by TheLeprechaun »

He's not motivated enough. Lazy habits. Disgraceful body in the ring.
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39328
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Nathan Gorman - Is that it?

Post by margaret thatcher »

yep, just doesnt seem into the game, wasnt in there at all
THEBUTCH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6645
Joined: 27 Jan 2004, 08:51

Re: Nathan Gorman - Is that it?

Post by THEBUTCH »

He was overhyped and now people wonder why he's flopped badly twice.

Gorman is useful at English title level but struggles at British level.

I seriously doubt he will have the gumption to carry on, but could possibly get another crack at the British title or the Commonwealth title if he can string a few wins together again. Maybe even a late notice call for a Europan title if an opponent drops out, but hard to see what else he is going to achieve.
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28495
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Nathan Gorman - Is that it?

Post by Coco »

THEBUTCH wrote: 27 Nov 2022, 19:24 He was overhyped and now people wonder why he's flopped badly twice.

Gorman is useful at English title level but struggles at British level.

I seriously doubt he will have the gumption to carry on, but could possibly get another crack at the British title or the Commonwealth title if he can string a few wins together again. Maybe even a late notice call for a Europan title if an opponent drops out, but hard to see what else he is going to achieve.
Dave Allen level
milpool
Cruiserweight
Posts: 5402
Joined: 18 May 2011, 13:38

Re: Nathan Gorman - Is that it?

Post by milpool »

I suspect so…
I didn’t think he was ever going achieve much and it comes as no surprise that he’s been found wanting as soon as he faces opponents that fight back.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23066
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Nathan Gorman - Is that it?

Post by mickey1975 »

Coco wrote: 27 Nov 2022, 20:04
THEBUTCH wrote: 27 Nov 2022, 19:24 He was overhyped and now people wonder why he's flopped badly twice.

Gorman is useful at English title level but struggles at British level.

I seriously doubt he will have the gumption to carry on, but could possibly get another crack at the British title or the Commonwealth title if he can string a few wins together again. Maybe even a late notice call for a Europan title if an opponent drops out, but hard to see what else he is going to achieve.
Dave Allen level
If you combined Gormans skill with Daves chin and heart, you’d have a top level fighter.
dookus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4488
Joined: 17 May 2005, 06:00

Re: Nathan Gorman - Is that it?

Post by dookus »

mickey1975 wrote: 28 Nov 2022, 02:31
Coco wrote: 27 Nov 2022, 20:04
THEBUTCH wrote: 27 Nov 2022, 19:24 He was overhyped and now people wonder why he's flopped badly twice.

Gorman is useful at English title level but struggles at British level.

I seriously doubt he will have the gumption to carry on, but could possibly get another crack at the British title or the Commonwealth title if he can string a few wins together again. Maybe even a late notice call for a Europan title if an opponent drops out, but hard to see what else he is going to achieve.
Dave Allen level
If you combined Gormans skill with Daves chin and heart, you’d have a top level fighter.
:TU:
CaptainSpacerod
Welterweight
Posts: 3367
Joined: 15 Dec 2015, 03:21

Re: Nathan Gorman - Is that it?

Post by CaptainSpacerod »

He’s fighting at the wrong weight. If he lived the life he’d be a cruiserweight.
JamesPhilips
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 6553
Joined: 19 Mar 2021, 06:43

Re: Nathan Gorman - Is that it?

Post by JamesPhilips »

CaptainSpacerod wrote: 28 Nov 2022, 08:57 He’s fighting at the wrong weight. If he lived the life he’d be a cruiserweight.
You think he could lose 70 pounds lol
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39328
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Nathan Gorman - Is that it?

Post by margaret thatcher »

well he'd only have to lose 55 or so, then cut the rest

i mean he's pretty f@ckin flabby, there's clearly a lot there he could lose. he was 250 in his debut and was still completely soft with love handles, jiggling, and 0 definition. whether he could get low enough for cruiser i dunno, but if he were in really good shape i doubt he'd be much above the 220 range. heavyweight conditioning and discipline is pathetic these days
JamesPhilips
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 6553
Joined: 19 Mar 2021, 06:43

Re: Nathan Gorman - Is that it?

Post by JamesPhilips »

margaret thatcher wrote: 28 Nov 2022, 15:58 well he'd only have to lose 55 or so, then cut the rest

i mean he's pretty f@ckin flabby, there's clearly a lot there he could lose. he was 250 in his debut and was still completely soft with love handles, jiggling, and 0 definition. whether he could get low enough for cruiser i dunno, but if he were in really good shape i doubt he'd be much above the 220 range. heavyweight conditioning and discipline is pathetic these days
Bridgerweight sounds good for him :lol: but come on if you can’t get in shape when you’re facing big punchers that could seriously damage you…. You’re not going to commit
rd350lc
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4940
Joined: 22 Nov 2014, 11:49

Re: Nathan Gorman - Is that it?

Post by rd350lc »

margaret thatcher wrote: 28 Nov 2022, 15:58 well he'd only have to lose 55 or so, then cut the rest

i mean he's pretty f@ckin flabby, there's clearly a lot there he could lose. he was 250 in his debut and was still completely soft with love handles, jiggling, and 0 definition. whether he could get low enough for cruiser i dunno, but if he were in really good shape i doubt he'd be much above the 220 range. heavyweight conditioning and discipline is pathetic these days
It's got to be harder to motivate themselves because they don't have to make a weight , plus they've seen Fury make a mockery of conditioning .
Not making excuses because Gorman has wasted a good career in my eyes , got plenty of talent .
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23066
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Nathan Gorman - Is that it?

Post by mickey1975 »

rd350lc wrote: 28 Nov 2022, 16:10
margaret thatcher wrote: 28 Nov 2022, 15:58 well he'd only have to lose 55 or so, then cut the rest

i mean he's pretty f@ckin flabby, there's clearly a lot there he could lose. he was 250 in his debut and was still completely soft with love handles, jiggling, and 0 definition. whether he could get low enough for cruiser i dunno, but if he were in really good shape i doubt he'd be much above the 220 range. heavyweight conditioning and discipline is pathetic these days
It's got to be harder to motivate themselves because they don't have to make a weight , plus they've seen Fury make a mockery of conditioning .
Not making excuses because Gorman has wasted a good career in my eyes , got plenty of talent .
There is a video circulating on Twitter of Fury rapping in his hotel room before the Wlad fight (as its seven years ago today) and he is in fantastic shape. Very lean.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17039
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Nathan Gorman - Is that it?

Post by keithmoonhangover »

mickey1975 wrote: 28 Nov 2022, 16:30
rd350lc wrote: 28 Nov 2022, 16:10
margaret thatcher wrote: 28 Nov 2022, 15:58 well he'd only have to lose 55 or so, then cut the rest

i mean he's pretty f@ckin flabby, there's clearly a lot there he could lose. he was 250 in his debut and was still completely soft with love handles, jiggling, and 0 definition. whether he could get low enough for cruiser i dunno, but if he were in really good shape i doubt he'd be much above the 220 range. heavyweight conditioning and discipline is pathetic these days
It's got to be harder to motivate themselves because they don't have to make a weight , plus they've seen Fury make a mockery of conditioning .
Not making excuses because Gorman has wasted a good career in my eyes , got plenty of talent .
There is a video circulating on Twitter of Fury rapping in his hotel room before the Wlad fight (as its seven years ago today) and he is in fantastic shape. Very lean.
Was the failed PED test before or after the dancing?
bripez
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4877
Joined: 11 Feb 2010, 18:07

Re: Nathan Gorman - Is that it?

Post by bripez »

keithmoonhangover wrote: 28 Nov 2022, 16:35
mickey1975 wrote: 28 Nov 2022, 16:30
rd350lc wrote: 28 Nov 2022, 16:10

It's got to be harder to motivate themselves because they don't have to make a weight , plus they've seen Fury make a mockery of conditioning .
Not making excuses because Gorman has wasted a good career in my eyes , got plenty of talent .
There is a video circulating on Twitter of Fury rapping in his hotel room before the Wlad fight (as its seven years ago today) and he is in fantastic shape. Very lean.
Was the failed PED test before or after the dancing?
Yeah, he has always looked terrible physique wise and he looked 40 when he was 20.

Recently though he has looked good, leaned out and looks a lot better.

Wonder wfat has changed?
Post Reply