Fighters you were wrong about

maverick23
Cruiserweight
Posts: 10375
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20

Re: Fighters you were wrong about

Post by maverick23 »

Enlightened-One wrote: 25 May 2022, 12:28
Syntax Error wrote: 25 May 2022, 11:03 Conor Benn - I thought he'd fall like a leaf in Autumn.

OK, he hasn't reached the pinnacle, but he's a lot better than I thought he'd ever be.
The jury is still out or me when it comes to Conor Benn.

It just can’t get over the fact that Benn’s last five opponents have been (on average) nine years older than himself, with most of them approaching their mid-thirties and considered past-their-primes.

His last five opponents were either on a poor run of form, weren’t natural 147lb-ers or never that good to begin with, when they entered the ring.

Conor Benn has been a pro for more than six years, but his career has progressed at a snail’s pace, especially when you consider how aggressive Matchroom were with the likes of Anthony Joshua, Carl Froch, Dillian Whyte etc.

I feel that six years is a long time and he’s been treading water for quite a while now.

According to the rumour-mill, Eddie Hearn is planning to pit Jose Ramirez against Conor Benn on the 9th July, with the American previously competing at 140lbs for his entire career and will be competing against the Brit outside of his natural habitat.

But if this fight doesn’t happen, then this will suggest that Matchroom don’t have much faith in Conor Benn.
AJ was a top amateur and so was Froch (world amateur champs bronze medallist) so it was easy to progress them quickly. Whyte was initially brought in to lose against AJ but did well and was matched well after that.

Benn had just 20 or so low level amateur fights and looked ropey early doors in his pro career (particularly against Peynoud) so I can understand why they’ve taken their time with him.

For me he’s had one too many fights at his current level and I’d have preferred a real live opponent instead of Van Heerden. He needs to step up next.
SportsRatings
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 679
Joined: 26 May 2010, 23:15

Re: Fighters you were wrong about

Post by SportsRatings »

oogiebe wrote: 25 May 2022, 23:41 tyson Fury
Tye Fields


You know, I actually think Tye Fields is one reason so many people completely discounted Fury. Just another big guy, of course he can beat smaller fighters but he'll be exposed like Fields eventually...!

I didn't think he was another Fields. I kept telling people he'd be a top ten fighter for sure, some day, since he was about 20 when people were already writing him off as a hype job. I never thought he'd be champion though.
oogiebe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 32990
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 19:35

Re: Fighters you were wrong about

Post by oogiebe »

SportsRatings wrote: 27 May 2022, 00:45
oogiebe wrote: 25 May 2022, 23:41 tyson Fury
Tye Fields


You know, I actually think Tye Fields is one reason so many people completely discounted Fury. Just another big guy, of course he can beat smaller fighters but he'll be exposed like Fields eventually...!

I didn't think he was another Fields. I kept telling people he'd be a top ten fighter for sure, some day, since he was about 20 when people were already writing him off as a hype job. I never thought he'd be champion though.
Interesting point. To be honest I never made the connection. Fields was my worst call and funniest. Never thought Fury would be as so dangerous in his diversity. Thought he'd always be a flick and move guy. Boy was I wrong. He's a terrific fighter. Fields flat out sucked! LOLOL!
Evander
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13979
Joined: 07 May 2005, 16:49

Re: Fighters you were wrong about

Post by Evander »

Floyd, Manny, Fury.
Underestimated all of them at one point.
HyacinthusTurnipseed
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1309
Joined: 11 Dec 2010, 16:34

Re: Fighters you were wrong about

Post by HyacinthusTurnipseed »

At the start of his career I, for some reason, thought Frankie Gavin was going to grow into the real deal, a great world champion fighter and maybe the guy to take the unbeaten record of Floyd Mayweather, even. I can't remember exactly when I gave up that idea, but for a while I was still convinced that a step up in class was going to get the best of him while he was underwhelming as an early prospect.

On the other hand, while he did lose recently, I was super-low on Teo Lopez and didn't think he had a lick of a chance against Loma, even though I'd even backed Commey to beat him and been badly wrong about that.
snake33
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 351
Joined: 12 Dec 2004, 07:31

Re: Fighters you were wrong about

Post by snake33 »

I didn't think Usyk could beat Joshua but I was basing that on the early Joshua,
the one that got up and beat Kilitchko, that beat Whyte/Parker/Povitkin. Not the
guy who hit a wall vs Ruiz.
H8Usernames
Featherweight
Posts: 1196
Joined: 21 Mar 2020, 21:02

Re: Fighters you were wrong about

Post by H8Usernames »

Tyeson Fields vs Tyson Fury aye?
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 100866
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Fighters you were wrong about

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

Evander wrote: 27 May 2022, 01:29 Floyd, Manny, Fury.
Underestimated all of them at one point.
At what point did you estimate them correctly in their careers?
The Asleep Lamps
Welterweight
Posts: 721
Joined: 07 Sep 2015, 11:18

Re: Fighters you were wrong about

Post by The Asleep Lamps »

I though Joshua would eventually beat Wilder and Fury on his way to claiming the era as his own.
I think Lennox Lewis said about Joshua vs Wilder something like, 'the person you think will win might not be the person who actually wins.' I took that to mean that he was leaning towards Wilder. I still like the fight. :OhYes:
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Fighters you were wrong about

Post by Counter-puncher »

maverick23 wrote: 26 May 2022, 02:56
Enlightened-One wrote: 25 May 2022, 12:28
Syntax Error wrote: 25 May 2022, 11:03 Conor Benn - I thought he'd fall like a leaf in Autumn.

OK, he hasn't reached the pinnacle, but he's a lot better than I thought he'd ever be.
The jury is still out or me when it comes to Conor Benn.

It just can’t get over the fact that Benn’s last five opponents have been (on average) nine years older than himself, with most of them approaching their mid-thirties and considered past-their-primes.

His last five opponents were either on a poor run of form, weren’t natural 147lb-ers or never that good to begin with, when they entered the ring.

Conor Benn has been a pro for more than six years, but his career has progressed at a snail’s pace, especially when you consider how aggressive Matchroom were with the likes of Anthony Joshua, Carl Froch, Dillian Whyte etc.

I feel that six years is a long time and he’s been treading water for quite a while now.

According to the rumour-mill, Eddie Hearn is planning to pit Jose Ramirez against Conor Benn on the 9th July, with the American previously competing at 140lbs for his entire career and will be competing against the Brit outside of his natural habitat.

But if this fight doesn’t happen, then this will suggest that Matchroom don’t have much faith in Conor Benn.
AJ was a top amateur and so was Froch (world amateur champs bronze medallist) so it was easy to progress them quickly.
Froch was, of course, developed by Hennessy and not Matchroom :TU:
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39211
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Fighters you were wrong about

Post by margaret thatcher »

i was wrong about connor too, i thought he was enough of a man not to frame poor innocent chickens for his own lack of fertilitiy
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39211
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Fighters you were wrong about

Post by margaret thatcher »

i;d say sunneh edwards, he got dropped i think in 3 earlier fights and i didnt expect his style and utter featherfistedness to carry up the levels like it has. very rare to get a top fighter who has absolutely no power, not even a hint of it
wrighty
Welterweight
Posts: 1010
Joined: 21 Jan 2016, 21:49

Re: Fighters you were wrong about

Post by wrighty »

Mike Perez. I thought he was different gravy early on
Evander
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13979
Joined: 07 May 2005, 16:49

Re: Fighters you were wrong about

Post by Evander »

Ruthless-RKO wrote: 16 Dec 2022, 06:56
Evander wrote: 27 May 2022, 01:29 Floyd, Manny, Fury.
Underestimated all of them at one point.
At what point did you estimate them correctly in their careers?
Correctly

When Floyd unloaded that combo on Augustus.
When Manny won Morales 2.
When Fury beat Klitschko.
wrighty
Welterweight
Posts: 1010
Joined: 21 Jan 2016, 21:49

Re: Fighters you were wrong about

Post by wrighty »

Simon Valily. Watched him win gold at the commonwealth. He had some skills, was fit, could have a row. Had cross over appeal. I thought the promoters would have liked him. His career was stop start and he took some weird fights like against Breidis when he was still a novice. Then he got taken out by Wardley at heavy (no shame in that). I genuinely thought he would turn over and be looking at domestic titles.
The Asleep Lamps
Welterweight
Posts: 721
Joined: 07 Sep 2015, 11:18

Re: Fighters you were wrong about

Post by The Asleep Lamps »

Bob Arum passed on signing Usyk because he thought HBO wasn't interested in cruiserweights.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Fighters you were wrong about

Post by gilgamesh »

I remember the first time I saw Carl Froch. He kept his left arm down really low, and seemed like he was wide open to be decked by right hands, and I kept saying for the first few times I saw him fight. "This guy is gonna get knocked out brutally one of these days with that left arm down bullsh*t"

Never happened, and in fact he won more often than not :lol:
Roars Like Me
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1763
Joined: 14 Feb 2006, 10:43

Re: Fighters you were wrong about

Post by Roars Like Me »

I saw Crawford beat Burns years ago, and whilst it was a shut out UD for him, still didn't think he is going to be particularly great...ooops
geronimo
Super Middleweight
Posts: 284
Joined: 09 Apr 2013, 04:51

Re: Fighters you were wrong about

Post by geronimo »

Kovalev. I guessed that he would have lost against Cleverly. I was thinking he was too slow and with poor tecnique. I was so wrong.
Quantrax
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Fighters you were wrong about

Post by Quantrax »

Ryan Garcia has done well but hasn't developed into the phenomenon I thought he would. He's had some mental health issues apparently.
KiwiRider
Super Lightweight
Posts: 26489
Joined: 11 Feb 2017, 22:25

Re: Fighters you were wrong about

Post by KiwiRider »

Quantrax wrote: 19 Dec 2022, 18:41 Ryan Garcia has done well but hasn't developed into the phenomenon I thought he would. He's had some mental health issues apparently.
He is only 24. And yes he has had some issues with his mental health.
The guy has serious potential, and real power. He made Fortuna earlier this year call no mas.

Definitely too early to call his career just yet...
AngryGoon38
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1837
Joined: 10 Jun 2008, 14:51

Re: Fighters you were wrong about

Post by AngryGoon38 »

I've been wrong about A bunch of so called fighters in recent times.
Why and how..? Well, Alot of them barely fight anymore.
They talk and do the trash talk gossip Alot more than they fight.
A bunch of disappointments.
I won't even make a list as I feel it's basically unnessasary and pretty self explanatory based on merely ones common sense based observations upon trying to follow boxing. :-?
robwilpow
Lightweight
Posts: 1
Joined: 01 Apr 2018, 16:25

Re: Fighters you were wrong about

Post by robwilpow »

With you on Fury and Price. I watched alot of Lennox Lewis's early fights and wasn't remotely impressed until he beat Gary Mason. That's embarrassing to admit to.
punchoutsb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5842
Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 01:05

Re: Fighters you were wrong about

Post by punchoutsb »

I thought Alexander Zolkin was going to grab a legit HW belt.
NateJR
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1181
Joined: 03 Jul 2012, 19:58

Re: Fighters you were wrong about

Post by NateJR »

Fury is a funny one. I actually made a prediction many years ago that Fury would be the guy to dethrone Wladimir Klit. This was when Fury was still fighting Euro level guys and was most famous for uppercutting himself. I claimed with his size and movement he would beat Wlad.

The boxing board I was on at the time laughed me right out of the conversation.

Carl Froch was a big surprise though. I agree with others above that he never passed the eye test. But he had many other entangibles that the eye just didn't pick up on. Toughness, grit and his desire to win made him dangerous every time out.

BJ Saunders I thought was the next Sven Ottke. I thought he was seriously that bad. I didn't believe BJ would ever get beyond Euro level and be protected his entire career.
Post Reply