Tim Witherspoon: In the Hall of Fame?

SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Tim Witherspoon: In the Hall of Fame?

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Check your sarcasm detector. Wise beat Chavez and Lawler beat Duran & benitez!
Nile4000
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7194
Joined: 17 Sep 2005, 15:21

Re: Tim Witherspoon: In the Hall of Fame?

Post by Nile4000 »

No, but Tim is very close.
1113203
Super Flyweight
Posts: 1
Joined: 14 Oct 2022, 12:50

Re: Tim Witherspoon: In the Hall of Fame?

Post by 1113203 »

elmersalsa wrote: 31 Aug 2016, 07:44 Does Tim Witherspoon belongs in the hall of fame in Canastota, NY someday?

Explain and why.
. Well he was only the 3rd man ever to regain the heavyweight tile. After Muhammed Ali and Floyd Patterson. He almost would of been 3 time champion and some people say he was robbed when he went the distance with prime Larry Holmes and just lost by SD in probably the best heavyweight championship fight of the 80s he had great brawl with Ray Mercer. He had one of the best overhand rights of all time. And he just fought all the great heavyweights of the 80s and some of the 90s i mean his resume has...

- Larry Holmes
- James "Quick" Tillis
- Greg Page
- Pinklon Thomas
- James "Bone Crusher" Smith
- Tony "TNT" Tubbs
- Frank Bruno
- "Merciless" Ray Mercer
- Andrew Golota

That's a good resume for the time he was boxing in am i wrong?
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39269
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Tim Witherspoon: In the Hall of Fame?

Post by margaret thatcher »

of course he shouldnt be a hall of famer
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13879
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: Tim Witherspoon: In the Hall of Fame?

Post by DrDuke »

Let's discuss, if he did more than Wlad. Someone, bring Alpy on. :OhYes:
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11173
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: Tim Witherspoon: In the Hall of Fame?

Post by Ezzard »

There's always that feeling he was 50-50 with Holmes and Larry avoided him after that.
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13879
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: Tim Witherspoon: In the Hall of Fame?

Post by DrDuke »

I had no problems scoring it for Holmes several times. Never had it even or for Witherspoon.
Ambling Alp II
Super Middleweight
Posts: 15185
Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31

Re: Tim Witherspoon: In the Hall of Fame?

Post by Ambling Alp II »

DrDuke wrote: 03 Jan 2023, 05:07 Let's discuss, if he did more than Wlad. Someone, bring Alpy on. :OhYes:
Of course Witherspoon did. No reason to discuss that.
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13879
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: Tim Witherspoon: In the Hall of Fame?

Post by DrDuke »

Ambling Alp II wrote: 03 Jan 2023, 11:46
DrDuke wrote: 03 Jan 2023, 05:07 Let's discuss, if he did more than Wlad. Someone, bring Alpy on. :OhYes:
Of course Witherspoon did. No reason to discuss that.
:yay:
HomicideHenry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 18722
Joined: 08 Sep 2005, 00:43

Re: Tim Witherspoon: In the Hall of Fame?

Post by HomicideHenry »

Personally I think of all the alphabet champions there was in heavyweight history he would be the best qualified to be in the Hall of Fame because he won a version of the heavyweight title twice.

And let's be honest back in the '80s it was even harder to reach the top than it is today. The saddest part about Witherspoon's career like so many boxers at that time Don King virtually took all of his money.

I'll never forget a quote from Witherspoon where he said something to the effect that he lived in an apartment that he would be embarrassed to show anyone despite him being champion of the world twice.

My personal opinion since they're starting to let in far lesser people into the Hall of Fame in recent years you may as well put 'Spoon in there. It all really started to change in my view when they put Arturo Gatti into the Hall of Fame and as much as I liked the man because he was in so many great fights the man was simply not a great boxer.
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13879
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: Tim Witherspoon: In the Hall of Fame?

Post by DrDuke »

HomicideHenry wrote: 03 Jan 2023, 15:40 Personally I think of all the alphabet champions there was in heavyweight history he would be the best qualified to be in the Hall of Fame because he won a version of the heavyweight title twice.

And let's be honest back in the '80s it was even harder to reach the top than it is today. The saddest part about Witherspoon's career like so many boxers at that time Don King virtually took all of his money.

I'll never forget a quote from Witherspoon where he said something to the effect that he lived in an apartment that he would be embarrassed to show anyone despite him being champion of the world twice.

My personal opinion since they're starting to let in far lesser people into the Hall of Fame in recent years you may as well put 'Spoon in there. It all really started to change in my view when they put Arturo Gatti into the Hall of Fame and as much as I liked the man because he was in so many great fights the man was simply not a great boxer.
That's the problem of multiple titles. 'A version of the title' - that's even sounds weird. It's impossible to see it as a real championship. Everyone know, that in the first half of the 80s Larry Holmes was the man. In the second half, after a brief sorting it out, Mike Tyson was the man.
Seamus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 17095
Joined: 31 Jul 2005, 23:38

Re: Tim Witherspoon: In the Hall of Fame?

Post by Seamus »

He really could have been a HOF'er but while the potential was there, the discipline wasn't.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46569
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Tim Witherspoon: In the Hall of Fame?

Post by gilgamesh »

If Tim ain't got in by now. Surely that settles that does it not?

Lots of more deserving guys.
Post Reply