So the Sky presser went south today & removed I believe from YouTube as Liam Smith's angle for trash talking Eubank was to accuse him of being one of those gay fella's that nobody ever sees with a woman.
Eubank responded by saying Smith cheats on his wife.
Looks like a bad day at the office for Smith, his own promoters apologizing for the homophobic nature of his comments and potential divorce papers waiting on him when he gets home
Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑19 Jan 2023, 10:53
Didn't Khan do the same thing to Brook?
Then he tried to use the rave angle didn't he?
He did actually but i think his angle was more to do with the incident in Tenerife where Kell Brook was obviously up to no good and nearly ended up a Jeffrey Dahmer style victim.
Ricky wrote: ↑19 Jan 2023, 10:51
So the Sky presser went south today & removed I believe from YouTube as Liam Smith's angle for trash talking Eubank was to accuse him of being one of those gay fella's that nobody ever sees with a woman.
Eubank responded by saying Smith cheats on his wife.
Looks like a bad day at the office for Smith, his own promoters apologizing for the homophobic nature of his comments and potential divorce papers waiting on him when he gets home
What a fcuking Divvy You can't say things like that especially on Sky the home of Political Correctness
Last edited by Nightmare Roy on 19 Jan 2023, 11:27, edited 1 time in total.
Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑19 Jan 2023, 10:53
Didn't Khan do the same thing to Brook?
Then he tried to use the rave angle didn't he?
He did actually but i think his angle was more to do with the incident in Tenerife where Kell Brook was obviously up to no good and nearly ended up a Jeffrey Dahmer style victim.
Khan implied Brook tried to force himself on "some poor guy" which maybe why he stabbed him
Poor form from Eubank, missing a clear opportunity to reference the build up to Rahman v Lewis II by inviting Smith to bring his sister along to verify Eubank's sexuality
dookus wrote: ↑19 Jan 2023, 12:54
Poor form from Eubank, missing a clear opportunity to reference the build up to Rahman v Lewis II by inviting Smith to bring his sister along to verify Eubank's sexuality
dookus wrote: ↑19 Jan 2023, 12:54
Poor form from Eubank, missing a clear opportunity to reference the build up to Rahman v Lewis II by inviting Smith to bring his sister along to verify Eubank's sexuality
dookus wrote: ↑19 Jan 2023, 12:54
Poor form from Eubank, missing a clear opportunity to reference the build up to Rahman v Lewis II by inviting Smith to bring his sister along to verify Eubank's sexuality
Isn't the sister autistic or something?
Well if so, then fair play to CEJ for sacrificing what would have been a tremendous heat-of-the-moment quip for the sake of human decency
dookus wrote: ↑19 Jan 2023, 12:54
Poor form from Eubank, missing a clear opportunity to reference the build up to Rahman v Lewis II by inviting Smith to bring his sister along to verify Eubank's sexuality
Isn't the sister autistic or something?
Yeh, good thing he didn't say that..
Who even said that in the Rahman-Lewis build up?
Must have missed that..
Lewis in response to Rahman insinuating he was gay, leading to a studio kerfuffle and broken table