Conor Benn - What Next?

Post Reply
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 100774
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

smiling assassin wrote: 31 Jan 2023, 18:41 Benns team are just blurring the lines. The WBC are going to put him back in their rankings so it clears him to fight for their belts. We all know that these sanctioning bodies are out for a pound note but the WBC (in my opinion)are the worst.

The BBBOC are still yet to see this 270 page document as they haven’t submitted it to them (make of that what you want). Benns is as guilty of taking steroids as Gary Glitter was of touching little boys. Let’s not let any thing The WBC do get away from that fact
Well he won’t be able to fight in the UK without a licence.

There’s probably a shoddy commission state in the US that might. But he ain’t selling tickets there.

Middle East is another option.

Don’t see how any commission would give him a license with this lingering.
Deserter
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6439
Joined: 04 Sep 2003, 10:01

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by Deserter »

Ruthless-RKO wrote: 31 Jan 2023, 18:58 Middle East is another option.
I've no doubt that Hearn is going to put him on an Abu Dhabi card in the wake of his recent deal with the DCT there. It's by some margin the most viable route IMO.
leejonesjnr
Middleweight
Posts: 2667
Joined: 31 Dec 2013, 18:32

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by leejonesjnr »

He will be able to get a license in loads of places.
It would be interesting to see what happens if he tries to box in the UK with a license from elsewhere as he hasn’t been banned by the BBBoC and could (in theory) box here with an alternative license the same as anyone else.
Frostieballs
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 1995
Joined: 15 Aug 2020, 17:38

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by Frostieballs »

Has anyone asked Benn this….

If you were so confident the tests were wrong, why did you and your team cover them up and not issue your 270 page dossier before they were leaked?

Even if he can prove his ‘innocence’ someone is guilty of concealing test results.
Deserter
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6439
Joined: 04 Sep 2003, 10:01

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by Deserter »

Frostieballs wrote: 31 Jan 2023, 19:19 Has anyone asked Benn this….

If you were so confident the tests were wrong, why did you and your team cover them up and not issue your 270 page dossier before they were leaked?

Even if he can prove his ‘innocence’ someone is guilty of concealing test results.
Great point
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28310
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by Coco »

It's almost like he isn't innocent
coneye
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8565
Joined: 21 Jun 2004, 06:00

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by coneye »

Personaly i'm not interested in what he does , If he fights again only thing i'm going to look at his who is the opponent , if its another mismatch with him coming in full off roids it really is going to do the matchroom banner a lot of harm , if he is off the juice ,well there going to need a good opponent to sell tickets and he'll get hammered anyway when its a decent opponent .
Regards WBC well really does and did anyoe expect any different from them '

The real intrigue for me is the BBBC will they stand by and allow Benn and Hearn to just virtually say go do one we are doing what we want , or are they going to grow a set and put there foot down ,

I think they will wait and then decide , we cannot ban him for failing tests from an organization we don't recognise especielly when he is'nt a member , which makes me think is this the planned route sorted discussed and agreed on months ago , such has the time when it was all secret service hush hush stuff , until it was leaked ,, Wonder if it was Seniour who leaked it
ashall2
Super Flyweight
Posts: 450
Joined: 24 Jan 2023, 15:00

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by ashall2 »

There’s a reason Benn has given up his British license and is refusing to cooperate with UKAD/VADA/BBBoC.
Last edited by ashall2 on 03 Feb 2023, 13:17, edited 1 time in total.
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 100774
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

Image

There’s a bit more on his story.

People sharing and licking his ass. Saying Clean Hearts Win.

:lol:
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by Counter-puncher »

ashall2 wrote: 01 Feb 2023, 05:39 Already dreading the 'innocent' narrative Hearn, Benn and Matchroom are going to roll out. To the casual eye they'll just see 'Benn innocent' and swallow it all up. Anyone with half a brain knows the WBC can be swayed with cold hard cash and there's a reason Benn has given up his British license and is refusing to cooperate with UKAD/VADA/BBBoC.
:TU:
polecateddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by polecateddy »

No idea how he would ever get his theories through a court, even on a balance of probabilities level of proof when even the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs say the use of clomifene isn’t authorised in the UK for farming and only a very small proportion of eggs are imported to the UK. They outline that there’s no evidence of clomifene being in the British food chain. Conor… ‘well we have our theories!’ lol Sure you do son!
https://www.britishboxers.co.uk/2022/10 ... ood-chain/
Controversial
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9152
Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by Controversial »

polecateddy wrote: 01 Feb 2023, 08:52 No idea how he would ever get his theories through a court, even on a balance of probabilities level of proof when even the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs say the use of clomifene isn’t authorised in the UK for farming and only a very small proportion of eggs are imported to the UK. They outline that there’s no evidence of clomifene being in the British food chain. Conor… ‘well we have our theories!’ lol Sure you do son!
https://www.britishboxers.co.uk/2022/10 ... ood-chain/
I guess no one can say with any certainty it’s impossible to happen and if there’s that element of doubt then they will have to give the benefit of the doubt.
joshj909
Lightweight
Posts: 5879
Joined: 01 Dec 2017, 06:16

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by joshj909 »

Controversial wrote: 01 Feb 2023, 09:34
polecateddy wrote: 01 Feb 2023, 08:52 No idea how he would ever get his theories through a court, even on a balance of probabilities level of proof when even the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs say the use of clomifene isn’t authorised in the UK for farming and only a very small proportion of eggs are imported to the UK. They outline that there’s no evidence of clomifene being in the British food chain. Conor… ‘well we have our theories!’ lol Sure you do son!
https://www.britishboxers.co.uk/2022/10 ... ood-chain/
I guess no one can say with any certainty it’s impossible to happen and if there’s that element of doubt then they will have to give the benefit of the doubt.
It should be reasonable doubt rather than any doubt. There can be "an element doubt" for anything. He could have pumped every PED under the sun into his body and just say that someone did it to him when he was asleep or he was spiked which would cause the tiniest bit of doubt but would be so farfetched that it should not affect the investigation.
polecateddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by polecateddy »

If he does fight on PED free now, he’s likely to have suppressed testosterone levels and look like garbage anyway. I can’t see much of a fruitful career ahead whatever happens.
Frostieballs
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 1995
Joined: 15 Aug 2020, 17:38

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by Frostieballs »

If he fights again, he should be asked, in every post fight interview, why the results of the two tests were concealed.

This is an offence in itself.
Controversial
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9152
Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by Controversial »

joshj909 wrote: 01 Feb 2023, 09:41
Controversial wrote: 01 Feb 2023, 09:34
polecateddy wrote: 01 Feb 2023, 08:52 No idea how he would ever get his theories through a court, even on a balance of probabilities level of proof when even the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs say the use of clomifene isn’t authorised in the UK for farming and only a very small proportion of eggs are imported to the UK. They outline that there’s no evidence of clomifene being in the British food chain. Conor… ‘well we have our theories!’ lol Sure you do son!
https://www.britishboxers.co.uk/2022/10 ... ood-chain/
I guess no one can say with any certainty it’s impossible to happen and if there’s that element of doubt then they will have to give the benefit of the doubt.
It should be reasonable doubt rather than any doubt. There can be "an element doubt" for anything. He could have pumped every PED under the sun into his body and just say that someone did it to him when he was asleep or he was spiked which would cause the tiniest bit of doubt but would be so farfetched that it should not affect the investigation.
Yeah I agree but if he argues he was eating loads and loads of eggs and they have evidence trace amounts can be found in eggs and they were buying them in batch from abroad then maybe enough to cloud the issue. I guess it depends on how much was in his system, if literally a tiny trace amount then maybe hard to argue the point
polecateddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by polecateddy »

Controversial wrote: 01 Feb 2023, 11:39
joshj909 wrote: 01 Feb 2023, 09:41
Controversial wrote: 01 Feb 2023, 09:34

I guess no one can say with any certainty it’s impossible to happen and if there’s that element of doubt then they will have to give the benefit of the doubt.
It should be reasonable doubt rather than any doubt. There can be "an element doubt" for anything. He could have pumped every PED under the sun into his body and just say that someone did it to him when he was asleep or he was spiked which would cause the tiniest bit of doubt but would be so farfetched that it should not affect the investigation.
Yeah I agree but if he argues he was eating loads and loads of eggs and they have evidence trace amounts can be found in eggs and they were buying them in batch from abroad then maybe enough to cloud the issue. I guess it depends on how much was in his system, if literally a tiny trace amount then maybe hard to argue the point
Import/exporters of eggs are regulated and inspected regularly. If government agencies are saying clomifene isn’t in the British food chain, then it’s got some weight behind it. Benn chucking in some obscure studies that were never even conducted in the UK isn’t particularly compelling.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16755
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by keithmoonhangover »

tony1234 wrote: 31 Jan 2023, 15:26
margaret thatcher wrote: 31 Jan 2023, 15:18 having no licence in the uk will be a bigger deal for now, as if he's gonna challenge spence for the wbc anytime soon
He won't sell a bean outside the UK , and in the UK he's become unmarketable unless people want to see him on his backside in a fight
His dad did alright in the states.
Controversial
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9152
Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by Controversial »

polecateddy wrote: 01 Feb 2023, 12:08
Controversial wrote: 01 Feb 2023, 11:39
joshj909 wrote: 01 Feb 2023, 09:41

It should be reasonable doubt rather than any doubt. There can be "an element doubt" for anything. He could have pumped every PED under the sun into his body and just say that someone did it to him when he was asleep or he was spiked which would cause the tiniest bit of doubt but would be so farfetched that it should not affect the investigation.
Yeah I agree but if he argues he was eating loads and loads of eggs and they have evidence trace amounts can be found in eggs and they were buying them in batch from abroad then maybe enough to cloud the issue. I guess it depends on how much was in his system, if literally a tiny trace amount then maybe hard to argue the point
Import/exporters of eggs are regulated and inspected regularly. If government agencies are saying clomifene isn’t in the British food chain, then it’s got some weight behind it. Benn chucking in some obscure studies that were never even conducted in the UK isn’t particularly compelling.
Of course and we all know how it sounds and how unlikely it is, I don’t know what levels were found or what counter arguments were put up though, as a lot have said coupled with procedural errors it can be made to look different
Last edited by Controversial on 01 Feb 2023, 13:40, edited 1 time in total.
polecateddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by polecateddy »

Controversial wrote: 01 Feb 2023, 13:19
polecateddy wrote: 01 Feb 2023, 12:08
Controversial wrote: 01 Feb 2023, 11:39

Yeah I agree but if he argues he was eating loads and loads of eggs and they have evidence trace amounts can be found in eggs and they were buying them in batch from abroad then maybe enough to cloud the issue. I guess it depends on how much was in his system, if literally a tiny trace amount then maybe hard to argue the point
Import/exporters of eggs are regulated and inspected regularly. If government agencies are saying clomifene isn’t in the British food chain, then it’s got some weight behind it. Benn chucking in some obscure studies that were never even conducted in the UK isn’t particularly compelling.
Of course and we all know how it sounds and how unlikely it is, I don’t know what levels were found or what counter arguments was put up though, as a lot have said coupled with procedural errors it can be made to look different
The counter-argument and procedural error approach would of course have to fit having an adverse/failed test TWICE!
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 22989
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by handsofstone »

Pretty unanimous in everyone's opinion that Benn is a PED head then, I'm still a bit skeptical I like to give people the benefit of the doubt in any walk of life, call me naive but we'll see I suppose, I'm not a total gullible idiot, I'm leaning towards him being guilty and finding a loophole but I'll reserve my judgment for when the facts come out, I did mention the WBC are crooks earlier in the thread but at same time Eddie and Mauricio have had their differences , I'd also be a bit surprised to see Mauricio miss an opportunity to push Eddie and one of his key guys under the bus
Controversial
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9152
Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by Controversial »

polecateddy wrote: 01 Feb 2023, 13:34
Controversial wrote: 01 Feb 2023, 13:19
polecateddy wrote: 01 Feb 2023, 12:08

Import/exporters of eggs are regulated and inspected regularly. If government agencies are saying clomifene isn’t in the British food chain, then it’s got some weight behind it. Benn chucking in some obscure studies that were never even conducted in the UK isn’t particularly compelling.
Of course and we all know how it sounds and how unlikely it is, I don’t know what levels were found or what counter arguments was put up though, as a lot have said coupled with procedural errors it can be made to look different
The counter-argument and procedural error approach would of course have to fit having an adverse/failed test TWICE!
Ha yep! Do you know if eggs are the only food source it could be in or are the other things someone could eat or drink that could make it show in their system?
polecateddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by polecateddy »

This study will be the cornerstone of that 270 page sprawl I’d imagine. It’s mentioned here but not sure if the follow ups ever were properly carried out; https://www.wada-ama.org/en/resources/f ... ene-doping

…so eggs and poultry meat seems to be the focus.
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28310
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by Coco »

The athlete has the responsibility to know what he puts in his body.

Not knowing that his chicken and eggs are full of substances on the banned list is no defence
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39208
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by margaret thatcher »

there are 26 billion chickens in the world......conor better watch his back with all this slandering

wouldnt want him to end up alone in a dark alley with these dudes

Image
Post Reply