Conor Benn - What Next?

tonyevs
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5841
Joined: 08 Feb 2004, 18:13

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by tonyevs »

My T Sharp wrote: 22 Feb 2023, 17:07 I only get close to 30 eggs a week at Easter
Very good :OhYes:


It will be interesting to see if the Board roll over now.

I think there is no coming back for Conor now. Whilst Eddie may promote him again, I feel the fans won't be there.
He will be a toxic brand from here on.
gregregegg
Lightweight
Posts: 9143
Joined: 29 Sep 2017, 04:08

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by gregregegg »

Given he was found innocent, that means the only reason this ever came out is a leak... so how many people have tested positive and been found innocent with simarly dodgy excuses.... scary thought, any of your favorite boxers may have tested positive and got away with it without the public ever knowing.
Nightmare Roy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16408
Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by Nightmare Roy »

I'd say most of the top level fighters are on the gear, he just got busted, twice.
leejonesjnr
Middleweight
Posts: 2667
Joined: 31 Dec 2013, 18:32

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by leejonesjnr »

Nightmare Roy wrote: 23 Feb 2023, 04:31 I'd say most of the top level fighters are on the gear, he just got busted, twice.
Why?
joshj909
Lightweight
Posts: 5882
Joined: 01 Dec 2017, 06:16

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by joshj909 »

Nightmare Roy wrote: 23 Feb 2023, 04:31 I'd say most of the top level fighters are on the gear, he just got busted, twice.
As much as I believe that there's a hell of a lot more on the gear than not, you can't judge them all without there being any actual evidence. He's the one found to have done it whereas others haven't which definitely makes him worse because it's conclusive but it's pure speculation for others.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16764
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by keithmoonhangover »

The WBC found that: (1) there was no conclusive evidence that Mr. Benn engaged in intentional or knowing ingestion of Clomiphene; (2) there were no failures in the procedures related to sample collection, sample analysis, or violations of Mr. Benn’s B Sample rights that would justify questioning or invalidating the Adverse Finding; and (3) Mr. Benn’s documented and highly-elevated consumption of eggs during the times relevant to the sample collection, raised a reasonable explanation for the Adverse Finding.
margaret thatcher
Featherweight
Posts: 39211
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by margaret thatcher »

king of eggs baby :lol:
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 100847
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

tonyevs wrote: 23 Feb 2023, 03:00
My T Sharp wrote: 22 Feb 2023, 17:07 I only get close to 30 eggs a week at Easter
Very good :OhYes:


It will be interesting to see if the Board roll over now.

I think there is no coming back for Conor now. Whilst Eddie may promote him again, I feel the fans won't be there.
He will be a toxic brand from here on.
He still has his loyal fans. The idiots we are on twitter day in and day out.
Nightmare Roy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16408
Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by Nightmare Roy »

leejonesjnr wrote: 23 Feb 2023, 04:42
Nightmare Roy wrote: 23 Feb 2023, 04:31 I'd say most of the top level fighters are on the gear, he just got busted, twice.
Why?
Becuase I think most sports are the same, and I guess the attitude becomes, well if my competitors are in it I may as well be.
Nightmare Roy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16408
Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by Nightmare Roy »

joshj909 wrote: 23 Feb 2023, 04:52
Nightmare Roy wrote: 23 Feb 2023, 04:31 I'd say most of the top level fighters are on the gear, he just got busted, twice.
As much as I believe that there's a hell of a lot more on the gear than not, you can't judge them all without there being any actual evidence. He's the one found to have done it whereas others haven't which definitely makes him worse because it's conclusive but it's pure speculation for others.
I agree
leejonesjnr
Middleweight
Posts: 2667
Joined: 31 Dec 2013, 18:32

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by leejonesjnr »

Nightmare Roy wrote: 23 Feb 2023, 06:00
leejonesjnr wrote: 23 Feb 2023, 04:42
Nightmare Roy wrote: 23 Feb 2023, 04:31 I'd say most of the top level fighters are on the gear, he just got busted, twice.
Why?
Becuase I think most sports are the same, and I guess the attitude becomes, well if my competitors are in it I may as well be.
Nah
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16764
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by keithmoonhangover »

leejonesjnr wrote: 23 Feb 2023, 06:59
Nightmare Roy wrote: 23 Feb 2023, 06:00
leejonesjnr wrote: 23 Feb 2023, 04:42

Why?
Becuase I think most sports are the same, and I guess the attitude becomes, well if my competitors are in it I may as well be.
Nah
I think the reaction of Spence Oliver and many other ex fighters was so convincing, that they must think PEDs are not as widespread as some are suggestion.
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by whiskey »

I will easily eat 14 eggs a week.

My cousin was eating a tray of 24 a day when he was doing powerlifting etc. He'd boil them, eat 12 but just the egg whites and bin the yolks. Then he'd push 2-3 in his mouth with protein shakes and other meals during the day. It was nauseating just watching him eat so many....

...also the smell from his arse in the gym afterwards would make a maggot gag. He used to drop his rancid guts on his training partner when they were bench pressing and his partner couldn't escape as trapped under the bar.
ashall2
Super Flyweight
Posts: 450
Joined: 24 Jan 2023, 15:00

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by ashall2 »

Matchroom are a laughing stock.
Last edited by ashall2 on 27 Feb 2023, 06:04, edited 1 time in total.
Steveh583
Super Featherweight
Posts: 4337
Joined: 24 Nov 2018, 06:06

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by Steveh583 »

Nightmare Roy wrote: 23 Feb 2023, 06:00
leejonesjnr wrote: 23 Feb 2023, 04:42
Nightmare Roy wrote: 23 Feb 2023, 04:31 I'd say most of the top level fighters are on the gear, he just got busted, twice.
Why?
Becuase I think most sports are the same, and I guess the attitude becomes, well if my competitors are in it I may as well be.
100% correct. Anyone who thinks they aren’t all on it is naive.
Rockytony67
Super Middleweight
Posts: 173
Joined: 22 Oct 2012, 13:27

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by Rockytony67 »

Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 100847
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

He's now calling out to Algieri and van Heerden..

Said, they both didn't last 6 rounds between them and talking shit

Said he'll rematch them both and test weekly and they both wont last 2 rounds.
polecateddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by polecateddy »

Steveh583 wrote: 23 Feb 2023, 09:06
Nightmare Roy wrote: 23 Feb 2023, 06:00
leejonesjnr wrote: 23 Feb 2023, 04:42

Why?
Becuase I think most sports are the same, and I guess the attitude becomes, well if my competitors are in it I may as well be.
100% correct. Anyone who thinks they aren’t all on it is naive.
Well I think a term you never really hear in boxing is biological passport. My understanding is that in for example international athletics, the athletes effectively have their levels of various hormones and such like monitored and recorded regularly. So even if you aren’t going over legal limits of say testosterone levels, but they’ve mysterious say gone up from the mid-normal range to sit at the high-end, or something like that, there would be the equivalent of a ‘please explain’ query for the athlete to deal with - and it better be a lot better explanation than I ate a lot of fricking eggs that week! They actively try to stop people playing the system for an edge. There’s just nothing like a biological passport system in boxing.
jtourettes
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 819
Joined: 20 Feb 2009, 07:24

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by jtourettes »

keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16764
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by keithmoonhangover »

ashall2 wrote: 23 Feb 2023, 09:02 That’s me done with Matchroom, I’ll never watch a show of theirs again. They’re an absolute laughing stock.
Were you OK with Fury after he failed tests and blamed a boar?
blanca
Middleweight
Posts: 1868
Joined: 21 May 2014, 13:15

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by blanca »

Rockytony67 wrote: 23 Feb 2023, 09:12
He's such an entitled little prike. Fight someone your own age and weight yer massive fake bearded hampton.
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23009
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by handsofstone »

34 eggs a week isn't that much, not saying hes telling truth but where did the 60 a day come from?
Monzon83
Lightweight
Posts: 741
Joined: 13 May 2018, 21:03

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by Monzon83 »

He's making himself very easy to despise isn't he?

Maybe that's the plan now, make him the fighter people will pay to see lose.
maverick23
Cruiserweight
Posts: 10375
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by maverick23 »

handsofstone wrote: 23 Feb 2023, 09:58 34 eggs a week isn't that much, not saying hes telling truth but where did the 60 a day come from?
No idea. Asked the same question so I’d imagine it’s made up and people have run with it as fact.
polecateddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Conor Benn - What Next?

Post by polecateddy »

Daily Mail sounds skeptical and finds more diet plan outlined by Benn not including too many eggs. Does remind us UKAD sees offences as strict liability. It’s the responsibility of the athlete what they put in their mouth. It’s got to be a ban coming up - do we think its a year? Two years would properly send a message!
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/boxin ... -year.html

…he does not look ‘natty’ in those pictures!
Post Reply