Sky Sports Boxing

Post Reply
maverick23
Cruiserweight
Posts: 10375
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20

Sky Sports Boxing

Post by maverick23 »

I was speaking to a friend earlier who’s not a die hard boxing but I’d say is more than a casual boxing. He was complaining about how poor boxing on Sky has got compared to 4/5 years ago.

I was thinking about it and for the first 12 weeks this year I.E. up to the week before the Okolie show, there’s just 1 UK show on Sky Sports which is this weekend’s Azim show that is more of NextGen.

Has there even be so little U.K. boxing on Sky Sports before?

I know they did the Eubank/Smith PPV which was a good fight but nothing particularly good for a PPV (I still bought it though).

Are we missing Adam Smith getting things facilitated in the background?
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 103017
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Sky Sports Boxing

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

Seems ok to me.

No one really subs to Sky Sports for boxing.

Think of Boxing as a bonus.

Boxxer seems to get things going.

Maybe it feels like a lighter schedule because there aren’t really many Big names with Boxxer.

Not well established names apart from a select few.
tony1234
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2171
Joined: 15 Sep 2009, 10:02

Re: Sky Sports Boxing

Post by tony1234 »

Boxing is split over 3 channels now so it's not a fair comparison to when it was just on Sky
maverick23
Cruiserweight
Posts: 10375
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20

Re: Sky Sports Boxing

Post by maverick23 »

tony1234 wrote: 08 Feb 2023, 15:59 Boxing is split over 3 channels now so it's not a fair comparison to when it was just on Sky
It was never just on Sky in the last 10 years. Frank was doing shows on allegedly and then BT.

Sky started 2022 on fire with Eubank/Williams and Taylor/Catterall on regular Sky Sports and a big PPv in Brook/Eubank.

Just feels a big come down this year so far.

Frank’s stepped things up on BT with Yarde/Beterbiev and Joyce/Zhang announced on regular BT with a couple of other shows too.
Twinkle Toes
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3341
Joined: 22 Sep 2003, 08:38

Re: Sky Sports Boxing

Post by Twinkle Toes »

I've touched on this before, they're spent out getting the names they have, hence shows concentrating on building those fighters and any fight they think they can get away with putting it on PPV.

Listening to Shalom earlier he mentioned one more signing but pretty much confirmed they have enough in their stable now. Gives you an idea what to expect going forward.
maverick23
Cruiserweight
Posts: 10375
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20

Re: Sky Sports Boxing

Post by maverick23 »

Twinkle Toes wrote: 08 Feb 2023, 16:05 I've touched on this before, they're spent out getting the names they have, hence shows concentrating on building those fighters and any fight they think they can get away with putting it on PPV.

Listening to Shalom earlier he mentioned one more signing but pretty much confirmed they have enough in their stable now. Gives you an idea what to expect going forward.
Yeah - I listened to a couple of bits from him earlier too. Worryingly he said fans had been demanding Frazer Clarke’s fight against Rydell Booker.

I wonder if Ben was expecting more money from Sky. Hence his comments to Billy Joe the other week.

We went from an era in the 2000s where we had loads of shows. A lot were poor quality but we had British or Commonwealth title fights all the time with some big shows from Frank. Some weekends we got shows on the Friday and Saturday nights.

Then we had the Matchroom era where it felt like decent arena shows every couple of weeks.

Now we’ve got a time I think where we don’t have many shows and the quality isn’t particularly good either it feels. Even compared to a year ago.
garethhop
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1637
Joined: 16 Dec 2012, 18:00

Re: Sky Sports Boxing

Post by garethhop »

I agree. Its much weaker. Last year was ok overall and theyll get going. Its still early for a stable that was built from scratch and I personally think theyve got a much better chance of building stars than DAZN do.
maverick23
Cruiserweight
Posts: 10375
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20

Re: Sky Sports Boxing

Post by maverick23 »

garethhop wrote: 08 Feb 2023, 17:00 I agree. Its much weaker. Last year was ok overall and theyll get going. Its still early for a stable that was built from scratch and I personally think theyve got a much better chance of building stars than DAZN do.
It’s still the best platform by a mile for building a star. DAZN, if it continues to just offer the sports it currently does, won’t be able to make stars and I’m not sure BT has the same ability as Sky to do it.

I just don’t ever remember a time where I’ve been less interested in boxing on Sky. Boxxer are 18 months in now so have had time and I think their start was actually really encouraging.

Perhaps they’ll look to hoover up some of the Probellum stable.
KiwiRider
Super Lightweight
Posts: 26621
Joined: 11 Feb 2017, 22:25

Re: Sky Sports Boxing

Post by KiwiRider »

I think the UK gets far more boxing on Sky. There hasn't been a non PPV fight on Sky downunder since October!
I quit them last month. What with the snooker, moto gp gone and virtually no boxing it wasn't worth the extra money any more.
ashall2
Super Flyweight
Posts: 450
Joined: 24 Jan 2023, 15:00

Re: Sky Sports Boxing

Post by ashall2 »

Frank W getting the Sky deal would have been the best outcome.
ashall2
Super Flyweight
Posts: 450
Joined: 24 Jan 2023, 15:00

Re: Sky Sports Boxing

Post by ashall2 »



Ben Shalom is useless.
Post Reply