....and Joe Louis was champ longer than Klitschko. So if that's important to you, Louis winsDrDuke wrote: ↑03 Mar 2023, 11:01If you weren't so silly and knew the 1st grade math, you would realize that Klit himself was somehow #1 HW about 10 times longer than Schmeling.keithmoonhangover wrote: ↑03 Mar 2023, 10:26For a time, Schmeling was the #1 heavyweight in the world and was recognised all over the world as the champ. Ross Purrity, well, he wasn't.![]()
![]()
Who ranks higher historically? Chris Byrd or Ingemar Johansson
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 16895
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Who ranks higher historically? Chris Byrd or Ingemar Johansson
Re: Who ranks higher historically? Chris Byrd or Ingemar Johansson
Just for those clowns to counter with more anectodes.HomicideHenry wrote: ↑03 Mar 2023, 11:19Erm why argue.... once again they're so called number one heavyweight lost to a guy arguably worse than Ross Puritty in Gypsy Daniels by first round knockout.DrDuke wrote: ↑03 Mar 2023, 11:01If you weren't so silly and knew the 1st grade math, you would realize that Klit himself was somehow #1 HW about 10 times longer than Schmeling.keithmoonhangover wrote: ↑03 Mar 2023, 10:26
For a time, Schmeling was the #1 heavyweight in the world and was recognised all over the world as the champ. Ross Purrity, well, he wasn't.![]()
![]()
Re: Who ranks higher historically? Chris Byrd or Ingemar Johansson
So, after you failed to prove, that Maxie was better than Klit, you simply picked another fighter to compare. Someone gotta be better than the gawddamn Klit.keithmoonhangover wrote: ↑03 Mar 2023, 11:21....and Joe Louis was champ longer than Klitschko. So if that's important to you, Louis winsDrDuke wrote: ↑03 Mar 2023, 11:01If you weren't so silly and knew the 1st grade math, you would realize that Klit himself was somehow #1 HW about 10 times longer than Schmeling.keithmoonhangover wrote: ↑03 Mar 2023, 10:26
For a time, Schmeling was the #1 heavyweight in the world and was recognised all over the world as the champ. Ross Purrity, well, he wasn't.![]()
![]()
The Klit lovers are amusing.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 16895
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Who ranks higher historically? Chris Byrd or Ingemar Johansson
Alas, we were discussing Louis and Klitschko. The reason Max was mentioned was because he was arguably Louis' worst loss.DrDuke wrote: ↑03 Mar 2023, 11:24So, after you failed to prove, that Maxie was better than Klit, you simply picked another fighter to compare. Someone gotta be better than the gawddamn Klit.keithmoonhangover wrote: ↑03 Mar 2023, 11:21....and Joe Louis was champ longer than Klitschko. So if that's important to you, Louis wins![]()
The Klit lovers are amusing.![]()
Are you saying Ross Purity is better than Schmeling?
Re: Who ranks higher historically? Chris Byrd or Ingemar Johansson
Nah, you, the klitlovers, were simply picking different fighters to claim they were better than the Klits. Don't try to escape from the subject, especially with these questions trying to drag irrational conclusions out of my words.keithmoonhangover wrote: ↑03 Mar 2023, 11:28Alas, we were discussing Louis and Klitschko. The reason Max was mentioned was because he was arguably Louis' worst loss.DrDuke wrote: ↑03 Mar 2023, 11:24So, after you failed to prove, that Maxie was better than Klit, you simply picked another fighter to compare. Someone gotta be better than the gawddamn Klit.keithmoonhangover wrote: ↑03 Mar 2023, 11:21
....and Joe Louis was champ longer than Klitschko. So if that's important to you, Louis wins![]()
The Klit lovers are amusing.![]()
Are you saying Ross Purity is better than Schmeling?
Better rename your page to 'klitmoonhangover'.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 16895
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Who ranks higher historically? Chris Byrd or Ingemar Johansson
You know I'm arguing against Klitschko, don't you?DrDuke wrote: ↑03 Mar 2023, 11:34Better rename your page to 'klitmoonhangover'.keithmoonhangover wrote: ↑03 Mar 2023, 11:28Alas, we were discussing Louis and Klitschko. The reason Max was mentioned was because he was arguably Louis' worst loss.
Are you saying Ross Purity is better than Schmeling?![]()
Re: Who ranks higher historically? Chris Byrd or Ingemar Johansson
The biggest lovers are haters. There're a couple of you clowns on this board, who are always ready to fill their two cents in about the Klits. Ain't it the true huge loving love?keithmoonhangover wrote: ↑03 Mar 2023, 12:05You know I'm arguing against Klitschko, don't you?DrDuke wrote: ↑03 Mar 2023, 11:34Better rename your page to 'klitmoonhangover'.keithmoonhangover wrote: ↑03 Mar 2023, 11:28
Alas, we were discussing Louis and Klitschko. The reason Max was mentioned was because he was arguably Louis' worst loss.
Are you saying Ross Purity is better than Schmeling?![]()
![]()
Re: Who ranks higher historically? Chris Byrd or Ingemar Johansson
To this point. I will say that. Over the years that's probably another reason why Boxing has appealed to me a little less. I used to have strong feelings about some specific fighters. Either I was REALLY a fan or I was REALLY not. I noticed after a while I never got nearly as strongly into the fights if I didn't feel strongly about one or both of the fighters involved.DrDuke wrote: ↑03 Mar 2023, 12:34The biggest lovers are haters. There're a couple of you clowns on this board, who are always ready to fill their two cents in about the Klits. Ain't it the true huge loving love?![]()
So yeah in all seriousness. For me anyway. It is more fun to watch a guy you hate fight, than it is to watch a guy you know nothing at all about.
I also would always pride myself on, no matter how I feel about the fighter I'm gonna call it like I see it in regards to whether he's winning the rounds or the fight. Once the bell rings, I let the action speak for itself.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 16895
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Who ranks higher historically? Chris Byrd or Ingemar Johansson
You're either drunk, brain damaged or just plain stupid. Either way, just leave me alone.DrDuke wrote: ↑03 Mar 2023, 12:34The biggest lovers are haters. There're a couple of you clowns on this board, who are always ready to fill their two cents in about the Klits. Ain't it the true huge loving love?![]()
Re: Who ranks higher historically? Chris Byrd or Ingemar Johansson
keithmoonhangover wrote: ↑03 Mar 2023, 14:52You're either drunk, brain damaged or just plain stupid. Either way, just leave me alone.![]()
Just don't cry.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 16895
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Who ranks higher historically? Chris Byrd or Ingemar Johansson
How very mature of you.DrDuke wrote: ↑03 Mar 2023, 15:10keithmoonhangover wrote: ↑03 Mar 2023, 14:52You're either drunk, brain damaged or just plain stupid. Either way, just leave me alone.![]()
![]()
Just don't cry.
Re: Who ranks higher historically? Chris Byrd or Ingemar Johansson
That urge to write something back.keithmoonhangover wrote: ↑03 Mar 2023, 15:37How very mature of you.DrDuke wrote: ↑03 Mar 2023, 15:10keithmoonhangover wrote: ↑03 Mar 2023, 14:52
You're either drunk, brain damaged or just plain stupid. Either way, just leave me alone.![]()
![]()
Just don't cry.
Re: Who ranks higher historically? Chris Byrd or Ingemar Johansson
Oooooo...someone's triggered!!!
