BoxRec NEEDS to conform in the area of:

Post Reply
gregregegg
Lightweight
Posts: 9144
Joined: 29 Sep 2017, 04:08

Re: BoxRec NEEDS to conform in the area of:

Post by gregregegg »

Feel like iv forgotten how to read... Can you explain what your trying to say more?
Lackeos
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3598
Joined: 26 Jan 2008, 03:05

Re: BoxRec NEEDS to conform in the area of:

Post by Lackeos »

Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2014 2:11 am
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13873
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: BoxRec NEEDS to conform in the area of:

Post by DrDuke »

Lackeos wrote: 21 Nov 2021, 05:38 Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2014 2:11 am
A definition of a slow starter.
Lenny Cravats
Super Middleweight
Posts: 7982
Joined: 23 Feb 2013, 10:43

Re: BoxRec NEEDS to conform in the area of:

Post by Lenny Cravats »

Bingo Crook wrote: 15 Aug 2022, 23:18 USYK 1ST
WILDER 2ND
JOSHUA 3rd
RUIZ 4.
Frank Sanchez, Joseph Parker.. any number of Boxers could fill the No-4 spot now. Michael Hunter's name I can add easily.
Boxings three (3) "sandtraps" present hour. 1) IBO 2) the "duel tri." 3) aa "Caution" on all former "duel tri" male and female. bb Fury nix it the language par the datelines on his first Lineal rein. This WILL pop up "in context."
IBO "problem" is at the world level alone. It effects the Male league only a.t.t. [I myself "CAN NOT CALL IT" on the Female side. Thus... it "remains ungoverned"/4 the moment].
Note: ALL active duel-tri players male as well as female are WORLD WIDE BANNED by the Board of the UWBCAFO-I.

What happened with that bus in the end, Bill?
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: BoxRec NEEDS to conform in the area of:

Post by Counter-puncher »

:lol: :TU:
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46272
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: BoxRec NEEDS to conform in the area of:

Post by gilgamesh »

This has gotta be the most unclear style of posting I've ever come across.
computerrank
Editor
Editor
Posts: 2492
Joined: 04 Jan 2003, 18:59

Re: BoxRec NEEDS to conform in the area of:

Post by computerrank »

Not at all, it's AI ... :TU:
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46272
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: BoxRec NEEDS to conform in the area of:

Post by gilgamesh »

computerrank wrote: 29 Jan 2023, 10:47 Not at all, it's AI ... :TU:
It might be A, but it missed the I :lol:
Finkel
Super Featherweight
Posts: 1380
Joined: 08 Sep 2018, 20:51

Re: BoxRec NEEDS to conform in the area of:

Post by Finkel »

In that case may I just say "Welcome!" to our new AI overlords.

I thought your posting style was very succinct and to the point. Please ignore these infidels; they know not what they say.

When the cullings begin (for our own good I'm sure), please remember you are fully accepted by the boxing fraternity.
:bow:
golden_labrador
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 1754
Joined: 25 Dec 2020, 18:18

Re: BoxRec NEEDS to conform in the area of:

Post by golden_labrador »

computerrank wrote: 29 Jan 2023, 10:47 Not at all, it's AI ... :TU:
:clap: I believed you
chinarich
Middleweight
Posts: 6862
Joined: 29 Dec 2013, 13:20

Re: BoxRec NEEDS to conform in the area of:

Post by chinarich »

Posts written in most confusing way, they are...
tiny_acres
Middleweight
Posts: 9430
Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43

Re: BoxRec NEEDS to conform in the area of:

Post by tiny_acres »

gilgamesh wrote: 29 Jan 2023, 13:03
computerrank wrote: 29 Jan 2023, 10:47 Not at all, it's AI ... :TU:
It might be A, but it missed the I :lol:
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
JCS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6243
Joined: 17 Dec 2004, 13:27

Re: BoxRec NEEDS to conform in the area of:

Post by JCS »

Why does this guy remind me of an old poster... who was it? Didn't he constantly ramble on about suing someone?
Bandog
Featherweight
Posts: 2471
Joined: 27 Jul 2019, 08:02

Re: BoxRec NEEDS to conform in the area of:

Post by Bandog »

Need to delete this whole idiotic thread.
funso banjo baby
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4417
Joined: 23 Sep 2005, 11:05

Re: BoxRec NEEDS to conform in the area of:

Post by funso banjo baby »

My head hurts
Post Reply