Iain John Lewis

Black Sam Bellamy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1476
Joined: 25 Sep 2008, 13:51

Re: Iain John Lewis

Post by Black Sam Bellamy »

TheLeprechaun wrote: 17 Jan 2023, 15:06 I'd hazard a guess that IJL wasn't in the core group of the old mans club.
Does it really matter ? A poor ref and an even poorer judge. He's not a victim however you want to frame it.
leejonesjnr
Middleweight
Posts: 2667
Joined: 31 Dec 2013, 18:32

Re: Iain John Lewis

Post by leejonesjnr »

olij999 wrote: 17 Jan 2023, 14:45
leejonesjnr wrote: 12 Jan 2023, 19:01 I hope IJL isn't using the same lawyer that BIBA are using to bring down the BBBoC, that guy is taking his fqing time
Hope all is well with you, Lee. Nice to hear from you again.
Still alive so far. Not been visiting BoxRec forum for a while as over time the b*llshit sucks away the enjoyment.
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28495
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: Iain John Lewis

Post by Coco »

leejonesjnr wrote: 17 Jan 2023, 18:07
olij999 wrote: 17 Jan 2023, 14:45
leejonesjnr wrote: 12 Jan 2023, 19:01 I hope IJL isn't using the same lawyer that BIBA are using to bring down the BBBoC, that guy is taking his fqing time
Hope all is well with you, Lee. Nice to hear from you again.
Still alive so far. Not been visiting BoxRec forum for a while as over time the b*llshit sucks away the enjoyment.
Good to have you back :box:
1181567
Super Flyweight
Posts: 130
Joined: 18 Feb 2023, 22:16

Re: Iain John Lewis

Post by 1181567 »

1143850 wrote: 06 Jan 2023, 17:04
https://www.boxbiba.com/?page_id=9417
Does anyone know if this still taking place, I live in Blackpool (Bispham to be precise) and I can't find any news anywhere :neutral:
Floydendizer
Welterweight
Posts: 197
Joined: 17 Jul 2016, 11:03

Re: Iain John Lewis

Post by Floydendizer »

Don’t think it happened, IJL & Lee Murtagh we’re reffing on that Misfit thing in the Midlands , BIBA’s takeover not happening yet they’ve had 1 appalling show so far this year.
THEBUTCH
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6645
Joined: 27 Jan 2004, 08:51

Re: Iain John Lewis

Post by THEBUTCH »

Very disappointing to see John-Lewis react in such a way.

I'm certainly not in the anti-IJL brigade, but there have been numerous contentious decisions rendered by Ian over the years and the Board have stuck by him.

The boxers who will no doubt feel hard done by some of his decisions have ultimately had to suck it up and keep going....Ian should have to !
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39328
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Iain John Lewis

Post by margaret thatcher »

lol funny to see he's doing misfits now, because i was watching another card while their last show was on, and the stream chat kept going on about a big robbery in a misfits women's fight, wonder if our ijl was at it again :lol:
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23183
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Iain John Lewis

Post by handsofstone »

IJL and Tel are legit responsible of at least 50% of what's wrong with the BBBC, cut them lose its a big improvement
Glass Joe
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 5005
Joined: 08 Feb 2012, 10:29

Re: Iain John Lewis

Post by Glass Joe »

Another crap offical Terry Oconnor just gave a stinker of a card in tonights YouTube BCB card. God knows why Terry still a judge (i know job for the boys)
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 103023
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Iain John Lewis

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

Taylor-Catterall Judge Accuses British Boxing Board of Bowing to ‘Social Media Pressure’

Veteran referee and judge Ian John-Lewis says the British Boxing Board of Control has made a big mistake in deciding to single him out for his controversial scoring of the Josh Taylor vs. Jack Catterall undisputed 140-pound bout last year.

The 61-year-old John-Lewis was one of three judges involved in last year’s infamous Taylor-Catterall title bout. Taylor’s split decision win sparked controversy, with many fans and observers in agreement that it was one of the worst decisions in recent memory in British boxing.

It was reported earlier this year that John-Lewis then sued the Board for treating him like a ‘scapegoat.’

John-Lewis recently spoke out about his ongoing litigation with the governing body and suggested that the Board was not acting out of due diligence but had simply caved into “social media pressure.”

“I was scapegoated, no doubt about that,” John-Lewis told Boxing News. “I can’t believe the Board bowed under social media pressure. But they’ve picked on the wrong guy.”

“I’m not worried, because the truth will come out,”
he continued. “I’m looking forward to the hearing – not to slag people off, but to get the facts across and have people think of things a bit differently.”

John-Lewis said he felt like he had his hands tied after the Taylor-Catterall fight because he was not allowed to freely justify what went into his scorecard. Referees are generally not allowed to speak to the press.

“A lot of officials do feel aggrieved when they can’t explain a decision,” John-Lewis said. “We do all moan about that. We can understand where they [the Board] are coming from – they don’t want us to dig a bigger hole for ourselves, or let reporters put words in our mouths – but we’re not stupid, and we know it looks bad, that not talking to the press looks like there’s something to hide.”
Ricky
Lightweight
Posts: 13895
Joined: 08 Aug 2018, 09:27

Re: Iain John Lewis

Post by Ricky »

Ruthless-RKO wrote: 03 Apr 2023, 07:03 Taylor-Catterall Judge Accuses British Boxing Board of Bowing to ‘Social Media Pressure’

Veteran referee and judge Ian John-Lewis says the British Boxing Board of Control has made a big mistake in deciding to single him out for his controversial scoring of the Josh Taylor vs. Jack Catterall undisputed 140-pound bout last year.

The 61-year-old John-Lewis was one of three judges involved in last year’s infamous Taylor-Catterall title bout. Taylor’s split decision win sparked controversy, with many fans and observers in agreement that it was one of the worst decisions in recent memory in British boxing.

It was reported earlier this year that John-Lewis then sued the Board for treating him like a ‘scapegoat.’

John-Lewis recently spoke out about his ongoing litigation with the governing body and suggested that the Board was not acting out of due diligence but had simply caved into “social media pressure.”

“I was scapegoated, no doubt about that,” John-Lewis told Boxing News. “I can’t believe the Board bowed under social media pressure. But they’ve picked on the wrong guy.”

“I’m not worried, because the truth will come out,”
he continued. “I’m looking forward to the hearing – not to slag people off, but to get the facts across and have people think of things a bit differently.”

John-Lewis said he felt like he had his hands tied after the Taylor-Catterall fight because he was not allowed to freely justify what went into his scorecard. Referees are generally not allowed to speak to the press.

“A lot of officials do feel aggrieved when they can’t explain a decision,” John-Lewis said. “We do all moan about that. We can understand where they [the Board] are coming from – they don’t want us to dig a bigger hole for ourselves, or let reporters put words in our mouths – but we’re not stupid, and we know it looks bad, that not talking to the press looks like there’s something to hide.”
He can't be serious with that, although ironically the Taylor Catterall card probably wouldn't make his top 100 greatest hits.
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 103023
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Iain John Lewis

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

Ricky wrote: 03 Apr 2023, 07:45
Ruthless-RKO wrote: 03 Apr 2023, 07:03 Taylor-Catterall Judge Accuses British Boxing Board of Bowing to ‘Social Media Pressure’

“I was scapegoated, no doubt about that,” John-Lewis told Boxing News. “I can’t believe the Board bowed under social media pressure. But they’ve picked on the wrong guy.”

“I’m not worried, because the truth will come out,”
he continued. “I’m looking forward to the hearing – not to slag people off, but to get the facts across and have people think of things a bit differently.”

John-Lewis said he felt like he had his hands tied after the Taylor-Catterall fight because he was not allowed to freely justify what went into his scorecard. Referees are generally not allowed to speak to the press.

“A lot of officials do feel aggrieved when they can’t explain a decision,” John-Lewis said. “We do all moan about that. We can understand where they [the Board] are coming from – they don’t want us to dig a bigger hole for ourselves, or let reporters put words in our mouths – but we’re not stupid, and we know it looks bad, that not talking to the press looks like there’s something to hide.”
He can't be serious with that, although ironically the Taylor Catterall card probably wouldn't make his top 100 greatest hits.
What does he expect from this? His scorecard was shocking. Why hasn't he come out to justify is?
margaret thatcher
Super Featherweight
Posts: 39328
Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43

Re: Iain John Lewis

Post by margaret thatcher »

if taylor-cat was a one off, okay, but ffs the guy's rap sheet is a f@cking mile long as a ref and judge
Frostieballs
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 2024
Joined: 15 Aug 2020, 17:38

Re: Iain John Lewis

Post by Frostieballs »

Ruthless-RKO wrote: 03 Apr 2023, 08:17
Ricky wrote: 03 Apr 2023, 07:45
Ruthless-RKO wrote: 03 Apr 2023, 07:03 Taylor-Catterall Judge Accuses British Boxing Board of Bowing to ‘Social Media Pressure’

“I was scapegoated, no doubt about that,” John-Lewis told Boxing News. “I can’t believe the Board bowed under social media pressure. But they’ve picked on the wrong guy.”

“I’m not worried, because the truth will come out,”
he continued. “I’m looking forward to the hearing – not to slag people off, but to get the facts across and have people think of things a bit differently.”

John-Lewis said he felt like he had his hands tied after the Taylor-Catterall fight because he was not allowed to freely justify what went into his scorecard. Referees are generally not allowed to speak to the press.

“A lot of officials do feel aggrieved when they can’t explain a decision,” John-Lewis said. “We do all moan about that. We can understand where they [the Board] are coming from – they don’t want us to dig a bigger hole for ourselves, or let reporters put words in our mouths – but we’re not stupid, and we know it looks bad, that not talking to the press looks like there’s something to hide.”
He can't be serious with that, although ironically the Taylor Catterall card probably wouldn't make his top 100 greatest hits.
What does he expect from this? His scorecard was shocking. Why hasn't he come out to justify is?
I think his point is he’s not allowed to justify it - an effective media gag.
Post Reply