...and still 115-114 - but this time for Canelo!
margaret thatcher!!!
-
Sweet Dick Willie
- Super Bantamweight
- Posts: 1116
- Joined: 22 Mar 2021, 13:44
margaret thatcher!!!
I finally rewatched Canelo-Bivol!
...and still 115-114 - but this time for Canelo!
...and still 115-114 - but this time for Canelo!
-
Sweet Dick Willie
- Super Bantamweight
- Posts: 1116
- Joined: 22 Mar 2021, 13:44
Re: margaret thatcher!!!
Just kidding, 119-110 (or 119-109) Bivol... But I could see how I scored some of the early rounds back then with my tired, tipsy, dreary Canelo glasses without realising most of the mexicans punches clearly landing on Bivol's shoulders.
Re: margaret thatcher!!!
You'll get over it.
Upsets can catch us out.
I had Bivol taking it by 3, it was a superb performance. It was one of those fights where one guy is slowly slipping back in points, but you kinda expect him to get back into it with his power.
Upsets can catch us out.
I had Bivol taking it by 3, it was a superb performance. It was one of those fights where one guy is slowly slipping back in points, but you kinda expect him to get back into it with his power.
Re: margaret thatcher!!!
Off topic but I had bjs vs canelo a lot closer than what the judges had it. Granted Bjs still lost but they said he was pretty much losing everything. I thought he was nicking a few rounds and was looking sharp. It just made me think "what's the point if judges will just do that". Yep I've had a bevvy
-
margaret thatcher
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 39328
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: margaret thatcher!!!
a much better score this time my man, i think i had it 9-3 or 10-2 bivol. a few early rounds and the 9th could've gone to nelo
Re: margaret thatcher!!!
How would it play out at 168?margaret thatcher wrote: ↑06 May 2023, 17:46 a much better score this time my man, i think i had it 9-3 or 10-2 bivol. a few early rounds and the 9th could've gone to nelo
-
margaret thatcher
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 39328
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: margaret thatcher!!!
good question, bivol never strikes me as being a big light heavy and he seems very confident about his abilities at 168. i think he'd still get the better of canelo, but the issue of getting a fair shake is always there. based on cards from the first fight, canelo would basically just need to do a tiny bit better
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23180
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: margaret thatcher!!!
The weight dispute for the rematch seems a rare problem where both Bivol and Canelo are perceived to be pushing for the harder option , Canelo obviously wants to prove he doesn't need to drag Bivol down to beat him and Bivol obviously wants to become undisputed at Super Middle and not have to drag Canelo up from his natural weight class to beat him him again, I've always loved the idea of Bivol at 168, he's always been a small Light Heavy
It shouldn't be hard to solve, Bivol deserves to have to have the ultimate say and hope he does because this will be a better fight at 168 imo
It shouldn't be hard to solve, Bivol deserves to have to have the ultimate say and hope he does because this will be a better fight at 168 imo
Re: margaret thatcher!!!
A fair assessment by both. I'm shocked Ryder had the success he did, but I think a lot of that is he has improved after the Blackwell stoppage!
-
JamesPhilips
- Super Bantamweight
- Posts: 6553
- Joined: 19 Mar 2021, 06:43
Re: margaret thatcher!!!
Has he got the same chef as Benn?
-
JamesPhilips
- Super Bantamweight
- Posts: 6553
- Joined: 19 Mar 2021, 06:43
Re: margaret thatcher!!!
They’re good friends apparentlywrighty wrote: ↑09 May 2023, 18:31Has he got the same chef as Benn?
Re: margaret thatcher!!!
I take it you were either pissed up or on the wacky backyJackSprocket wrote: ↑06 May 2023, 09:49 I finally rewatched Canelo-Bivol!
...and still 115-114 - but this time for Canelo!![]()
Re: margaret thatcher!!!
Read his second post.stevec@france wrote: ↑10 May 2023, 11:53I take it you were either pissed up or on the wacky backyJackSprocket wrote: ↑06 May 2023, 09:49 I finally rewatched Canelo-Bivol!
...and still 115-114 - but this time for Canelo!![]()
![]()
Re: margaret thatcher!!!
dont be clever !oogiebe wrote: ↑10 May 2023, 22:12Read his second post.stevec@france wrote: ↑10 May 2023, 11:53I take it you were either pissed up or on the wacky backyJackSprocket wrote: ↑06 May 2023, 09:49 I finally rewatched Canelo-Bivol!
...and still 115-114 - but this time for Canelo!![]()
![]()
Re: margaret thatcher!!!
Cannot believe MagThatch getting his own thread - he’s a slag.
Re: margaret thatcher!!!
stevec@france wrote: ↑11 May 2023, 09:56dont be clever !
-
Sweet Dick Willie
- Super Bantamweight
- Posts: 1116
- Joined: 22 Mar 2021, 13:44
-
Frostieballs
- Super Bantamweight
- Posts: 2024
- Joined: 15 Aug 2020, 17:38
Re: margaret thatcher!!!
Every time I see this thread title I think it’s going to be about the miners.
-
margaret thatcher
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 39328
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43