Frank Bruno versus George Foreman

[goose 5]

1989- 12 rounds.

[HomicideHenry]

Foreman in 1989 was still seen as something of a novelty act, and Bruno was trying to rebuild after losing to Mike Tyson. I think it'd of been a great fight. Both men blasting each other, with moments where both seem to be rocking and reeling. Somehow, though, I think I goes the distance.

Foreman's cross-arm defense was great until Holyfield, but the issue was he couldn't unload power punches fast enough from that stance. He abandoned it after Holyfield. In 1989 it was in full use. Bruno could've capitalized off of that. Though not well known for his boxing and movement, Bruno certainly could box and move around as evident in the McCall fight.

Either Foreman wins a narrow decision after scoring a knockdown at some point, or Bruno wins a majority decision after a few anxious rounds where Bruno looked in trouble.

[gilgamesh]

Foreman in 1989 was still seen as something of a novelty act, and Bruno was trying to rebuild after losing to Mike Tyson. I think it'd of been a great fight. Both men blasting each other, with moments where both seem to be rocking and reeling. Somehow, though, I think I goes the distance.

Foreman's cross-arm defense was great until Holyfield, but the issue was he couldn't unload power punches fast enough from that stance. He abandoned it after Holyfield. In 1989 it was in full use. Bruno could've capitalized off of that. Though not well known for his boxing and movement, Bruno certainly could box and move around as evident in the McCall fight.

Either Foreman wins a narrow decision after scoring a knockdown at some point, or Bruno wins a majority decision after a few anxious rounds where Bruno looked in trouble.

I can totally see it playing out that way. I also don't think it'd be out of the question for Foreman to KO Bruno. Foreman KO'ing anybody is never out of the question of course.

[Joson]

No disrespect to Bruno, who I've always regarded as a good fighter, but Foreman would have blown him away. Big George had too much strength, experience, and punching power. This ends by stoppage between the 5th and 8th rounds.

Bruno would give a good account of himself, using his hurtful, quick left-jab to force George to remain at a safe distance. Frank would also throw lots of power punches to get Foreman's respect. But as this happens Foreman would defend efficiently, blocking most shots and showing excellent durability if and when he gets clocked on the jaw.

Foreman would assert his own offensive early. He'd patiently stalk Bruno, getting the better of the jabbing exchanges, and sometimes unload wrecking ball left-hooks, crosses, and upper-cuts. He'd bang the body too.

When Bruno samples Foreman's power, he'd realize he has no option except to back away, for reasons of survival. That's when Foreman would step up his attack. Sooner or latter, Bruno hits the canvas. He gets up, but from that point onward, he's constantly in trouble.

It could end via a ten count, or because Bruno's been floored and wobbled too much. Either way, Big George wins big (no pun intended).

[Noxy]

Foreman in 1989 was still seen as something of a novelty act, and Bruno was trying to rebuild after losing to Mike Tyson. I think it'd of been a great fight. Both men blasting each other, with moments where both seem to be rocking and reeling. Somehow, though, I think I goes the distance.

Foreman's cross-arm defense was great until Holyfield, but the issue was he couldn't unload power punches fast enough from that stance. He abandoned it after Holyfield. In 1989 it was in full use. Bruno could've capitalized off of that. Though not well known for his boxing and movement, Bruno certainly could box and move around as evident in the McCall fight.

Either Foreman wins a narrow decision after scoring a knockdown at some point, or Bruno wins a majority decision after a few anxious rounds where Bruno looked in trouble.

I never understood that cross arm defence. I think there’s a reason you hardly ever see it.

[Noxy]

I think Frank would have won on points as the younger man. But it’s a close one.

[elmersalsa]

I don't think that Frank Bruno would have signed for the fight. Maybe if they pay him $15 million dollars he would.

And still, he was too clumsy at times and discouraged as soon as he gets the first shot to the face.


Big George by knockout.

[DrDuke]

Foreman by kayo. Bruno could lead for some time, but it's pretty hard to see a credible puncher not stopping Bruno.

[HomicideHenry]

Foreman in 1989 was still seen as something of a novelty act, and Bruno was trying to rebuild after losing to Mike Tyson. I think it'd of been a great fight. Both men blasting each other, with moments where both seem to be rocking and reeling. Somehow, though, I think I goes the distance.

Foreman's cross-arm defense was great until Holyfield, but the issue was he couldn't unload power punches fast enough from that stance. He abandoned it after Holyfield. In 1989 it was in full use. Bruno could've capitalized off of that. Though not well known for his boxing and movement, Bruno certainly could box and move around as evident in the McCall fight.

Either Foreman wins a narrow decision after scoring a knockdown at some point, or Bruno wins a majority decision after a few anxious rounds where Bruno looked in trouble.

I never understood that cross arm defence. I think there’s a reason you hardly ever see it.

You either have to be really powerful, really fast, really tough or really intelligent to pull it off. Fullmer was really tough; then again he used a reverse cross guard that made him all the more awkward. Moore was really intelligent. Norton was quick. Foreman was strong. It's great for defense, but really sucks offensively.

[oogiebe]

Better question here is what round does Bruno get stopped. Either young or old George beats Frank handily.

[Les Norton]

Foreman as soon as he lands big, wouldn’t last 3 rounds