Woods vs Johnson ROUND-X-ROUND

Who Will Win And How???

Johnson By Decision
1
13%
Johnson By KO
2
25%
Woods By Decision
3
38%
Woods By KO
2
25%
Either Fighter By DQ
0
No votes
Draw
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 8

hitman_hatton1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6150
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 20:57

Post by hitman_hatton1 »

woods came back well there.

5-5.

no way was the 9th a 10-8.
WinnersATS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7
Joined: 07 Feb 2006, 15:19

Post by WinnersATS »

Here comes some stupid hometown local scorecards that will
give us yet one more fight between these guys, u watch!!!

What is the boxing world coming to when these guys have to
fight each other four times to see who is better???
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13284
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Post by MightyWarrior »

Clint wins the 11th! Looks much the stronger now. Glen on his last legs by looks of it. Big round coming up.................
hitman_hatton1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6150
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 20:57

Post by hitman_hatton1 »

woods rd. :D

6-5 woods. :TU:

johnson blowing thru his backside at the end of the 11th.
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13284
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Post by MightyWarrior »

Woods take the 12th - outlands a tired GJ to win the last three rnds...great comeback but was it enough?? Gonna be close. Stay tuned :TU:
hitman_hatton1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6150
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 20:57

Post by hitman_hatton1 »

7-5 woods.

woods pulled out the last 3 to win it. :TU:

just hope he gets it.
nas7232
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 101
Joined: 24 Jul 2005, 16:24

Post by nas7232 »

I bet it's a SD in favour of Woods
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13284
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Post by MightyWarrior »

Woods wins by split dec. UK judge went for GJ...
nas7232
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 101
Joined: 24 Jul 2005, 16:24

Post by nas7232 »

lol i was right

115-113, 113-115,116-112 to Woods.

Made £260 out of this fight lol nice1 Woods.
hitman_hatton1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6150
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 20:57

Post by hitman_hatton1 »

mickey vann u traitor. :lol:

woods did enuff in a brutal scrap.

well done clinton. :TU:
WinnersATS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7
Joined: 07 Feb 2006, 15:19

Post by WinnersATS »

Thanks for all the good work!!

It was/is appreciated, very much, thanks again, have a great day :)
WinnersATS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7
Joined: 07 Feb 2006, 15:19

Post by WinnersATS »

each have a win and a drwa, any1 think its worth a 4th fight lol lol lol lol
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27497
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Post by stujones »

Well, I had it a draw. 6-6. There could have been an argument for Johnson losing the 2nd - but also an argument for a 10-8 round in the tenth.

Micky Vann did his job though! Lol!.

Same problem with Johnson for most of his big fights.... he can fight at a tremendous fight for 9 rounds, but he cannot do 12 rounds at the same intensity. He took rounds off in the previous two meetings.
MightyWarrior
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13284
Joined: 23 Jan 2003, 14:01

Post by MightyWarrior »

I had it 114-113 to Johnson but too close to argue. Suprised at that P Rican judge - he had it to Woods easy.
hitman_hatton1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6150
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 20:57

Post by hitman_hatton1 »

stujones wrote:Well, I had it a draw. 6-6. There could have been an argument for Johnson losing the 2nd - but also an argument for a 10-8 round in the tenth.

Micky Vann did his job though! Lol!.

Same problem with Johnson for most of his big fights.... he can fight at a tremendous fight for 9 rounds, but he cannot do 12 rounds at the same intensity. He took rounds off in the previous two meetings.
yeah i could see how u had it 6-6.

rd 2 was debateable.

johnson would get crucified by calzaghe. :lol:

calzaghe would thrash woods to as well. :box:
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27497
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Post by stujones »

I have to say the "Woods has improved" tag has been considerably overated. Johnson is slowing and it was his legs that cost him the fight, as opposed to the great improvement Woods has made.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27497
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Post by stujones »

hitman_hatton1 wrote:
stujones wrote:Well, I had it a draw. 6-6. There could have been an argument for Johnson losing the 2nd - but also an argument for a 10-8 round in the tenth.

Micky Vann did his job though! Lol!.

Same problem with Johnson for most of his big fights.... he can fight at a tremendous fight for 9 rounds, but he cannot do 12 rounds at the same intensity. He took rounds off in the previous two meetings.
yeah i could see how u had it 6-6.

rd 2 was debateable.

johnson would get crucified by calzaghe. :lol:

calzaghe would thrash woods to as well. :box:
Yep, I agree with all that. I meant 9th as the possible 10-8.
hitman_hatton1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6150
Joined: 26 Nov 2003, 20:57

Post by hitman_hatton1 »

stujones wrote:I have to say the "Woods has improved" tag has been considerably overated. Johnson is slowing and it was his legs that cost him the fight, as opposed to the great improvement Woods has made.
woods was so open to that right over the top. :roll: it was almost embarassing how often he was getting tagged with it. johnson couldn't miss at some points in the fight.

but fornicate it woods won and keeps his title. :D
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27497
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Post by stujones »

Away from the boxing, and I see the lovely Lucy Cohen (now Owen unfortunately) is doing the big national news.

I hope that doesn't mean she is leaving Wales TV.
mattym
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 297
Joined: 17 Feb 2006, 15:13

Post by mattym »

fancy Mickey Vann having it 3 points in favour of Johnson!!!

seems kinda strange as i always thought if MV said it and it included the word boxing, it was damn well true. But imo Glencoffe DID NOT win that extremely close and gruelling fight.
Razor
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 713
Joined: 19 Jul 2004, 21:04

Post by Razor »

I had Johnson 2 up goin in to the 10th

Woods won the last 3 so he nicked it 115-114 Woods

Good fight
harrygreb
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2341
Joined: 25 Jan 2006, 05:02

Post by harrygreb »

woods had to win the last 3 and respect to him he did just that. glen gambled on ending it in the first half or around 9 before he ran out of gas.
hats off to clinton woods this was a tough one and glen johnson still ranks big with me - very enjoyable fight.
i think clints cornerman was getting a bit pissed with ricky hatton - he told him to keep quiet at one stage.
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Post by Autobarn »

Woods won that 7-5. Well deserved. He was out of it but he came back & won the championship rounds.

Stop bitching and give Woods his dues. Woods is well improved and it showed in the result. Consider that in the 1st 2 fights Woods was doing more defending than attacking. No wonder he got caught more in this far more offensive battle & no wonder he was tired. He put more on the line, threw more combos, paced the fight just right.

If Woods wins on a Warren-Warrior's promotion, no way is that a 'home decision'. CW was on a hostile promotion.

This is one of the best fights we'll see this year. I knew that the standard of boxing would be way better this time, between the pair, & it was.
glahn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 992
Joined: 19 Nov 2005, 13:29

Post by glahn »

This is more like it. The Americans on current scene are screaming "robbery", which is ridiculous. I can understand someone scoring it to Johnson by one or two rounds, but it was a very close fight and never in a million years was it a robbery.
mrbassie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1563
Joined: 26 Oct 2003, 00:55

Post by mrbassie »

9-3 Johnson.
Robbery
Post Reply