Was that fight or faint?

Post Reply
mulder
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 57
Joined: 24 Oct 2004, 04:14

Was that fight or faint?

Post by mulder »

Did they say Barrett had come to Fight or faint? :-?
The farcical Khan band wagon rolls on!.....The initial Knockdown wasn't
that bad but then again if you catch a student doctors skeleton flush, it
will go down but.......
What was the rest about!..............Pathetic!
P T Barnum knew what he was talking about..........Enough of the pudding!........The meat and potatoes were great :box:
Woods was a great example of my last post.
Johnson was superb but Old Father Time hampered him in the later rounds and i think Woods grit swung it :TU:
Nice contrast though the best and worst of Boxing on the same bill :D
What do you think?
Hagler2002
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3512
Joined: 28 Dec 2005, 07:04

Post by Hagler2002 »

Great main event but its beyond me why ITV feel the need to pre-record the undercard fights and then show them, would have been much better with the undercard plenty build up then the main course.....we even got the bloody news half way through the broadcast.
josh fg
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3180
Joined: 07 Jul 2004, 20:30

Post by josh fg »

Can we not have double posts on the same subject the substantive of the debate on Kahn's fight is on the post titled "bloody Nora"
mulder
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 57
Joined: 24 Oct 2004, 04:14

Post by mulder »

josh fg wrote:Can we not have double posts on the same subject the substantive of the debate on Kahn's fight is on the post titled "bloody Nora"
Whoa! sorry dude :oops:
What put the bug up your arse? all the hassle of having to flit between
threads or people having there own thoughts and doing there own thing
POLITICS?........... New Labour......Ill bet :D
josh fg
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3180
Joined: 07 Jul 2004, 20:30

Post by josh fg »

mulder wrote:
josh fg wrote:Can we not have double posts on the same subject the substantive of the debate on Kahn's fight is on the post titled "bloody Nora"
Whoa! sorry dude :oops:
What put the bug up your arse? all the hassle of having to flit between
threads or people having there own thoughts and doing there own thing
POLITICS?........... New Labour......Ill bet :D
:lol: :lol: :lol: if you knew what I do then you'd proberbly retract that statement, more to the point I just wanna make it easier for people to follow the threads, not having a go mate I assumed you just hadn't read the other post it not being well named.
mulder
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 57
Joined: 24 Oct 2004, 04:14

Post by mulder »

josh fg wrote:
mulder wrote:
josh fg wrote:Can we not have double posts on the same subject the substantive of the debate on Kahn's fight is on the post titled "bloody Nora"
Whoa! sorry dude :oops:
What put the bug up your arse? all the hassle of having to flit between
threads or people having there own thoughts and doing there own thing
POLITICS?........... New Labour......Ill bet :D
:lol: :lol: :lol: if you knew what I do then you'd proberbly retract that statement, more to the point I just wanna make it easier for people to follow the threads, not having a go mate I assumed you just hadn't read the other post it not being well named.
Wow that's got me curious!
Retraction!!!....it better be good :lol:
No offence taken and Point taken :TU:
Keep well
Post Reply