Fury vs Ngannou

jwfg
Super Flyweight
Posts: 2607
Joined: 11 Mar 2023, 19:21

Re: Fury vs Ngannou

Post by jwfg »

maverick23 wrote: 13 Oct 2023, 09:44
jwfg wrote: 13 Oct 2023, 09:32
maverick23 wrote: 13 Oct 2023, 09:24

Perhaps don’t believe everything you hear. If probably the most well known active boxer in the world has ‘adverse findings’ and is out of the sport due to that then it would be more common knowledge than just hearsay.
When was it common knowledge that he failed the Hammer test?
Something like 15 months after it happened. I still don’t believe how he could fail a test for Hammer and then still fight Klitschko.

I don’t believe that these supposed silent bans that some people talk about on Twitter are a thing. What kind of test has supposedly failed and who’s suspended him?
There are plenty of failed tests that don't come to light. Fury is riding it out due to a technicality. By early next year, he'll be able to have a sanctioned fight again under proper boxing rules.
maverick23
Cruiserweight
Posts: 10375
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20

Re: Fury vs Ngannou

Post by maverick23 »

jwfg wrote: 13 Oct 2023, 09:57
maverick23 wrote: 13 Oct 2023, 09:44
jwfg wrote: 13 Oct 2023, 09:32

When was it common knowledge that he failed the Hammer test?
Something like 15 months after it happened. I still don’t believe how he could fail a test for Hammer and then still fight Klitschko.

I don’t believe that these supposed silent bans that some people talk about on Twitter are a thing. What kind of test has supposedly failed and who’s suspended him?
There are plenty of failed tests that don't come to light. Fury is riding it out due to a technicality. By early next year, he'll be able to have a sanctioned fight again under proper boxing rules.
I think we’ve been through this before.

How do you know there are plenty of failed tests that haven’t come to light? Do you have one concrete example of a fighter that’s failed a test that hasn’t come to light yet?

What’s the technicality that Fury has?
jwfg
Super Flyweight
Posts: 2607
Joined: 11 Mar 2023, 19:21

Re: Fury vs Ngannou

Post by jwfg »

maverick23 wrote: 13 Oct 2023, 10:14
jwfg wrote: 13 Oct 2023, 09:57
maverick23 wrote: 13 Oct 2023, 09:44

Something like 15 months after it happened. I still don’t believe how he could fail a test for Hammer and then still fight Klitschko.

I don’t believe that these supposed silent bans that some people talk about on Twitter are a thing. What kind of test has supposedly failed and who’s suspended him?
There are plenty of failed tests that don't come to light. Fury is riding it out due to a technicality. By early next year, he'll be able to have a sanctioned fight again under proper boxing rules.
I think we’ve been through this before.

How do you know there are plenty of failed tests that haven’t come to light? Do you have one concrete example of a fighter that’s failed a test that hasn’t come to light yet?

What’s the technicality that Fury has?
Fury's didn't come to light for the first 14 months. He was allowed to fight Klitschko fight. Ask yourself why that didn't come to light? He failed a test for one of Fwank's shows and UKADA didn't release publicly. Why? Because boxing is corrupt.

Concrete proof? Oscar Rivas failed a test in the buildup to the Whyte fight and it only came to light when Whyte failed.
maverick23
Cruiserweight
Posts: 10375
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20

Re: Fury vs Ngannou

Post by maverick23 »

jwfg wrote: 13 Oct 2023, 12:33
maverick23 wrote: 13 Oct 2023, 10:14
jwfg wrote: 13 Oct 2023, 09:57

There are plenty of failed tests that don't come to light. Fury is riding it out due to a technicality. By early next year, he'll be able to have a sanctioned fight again under proper boxing rules.
I think we’ve been through this before.

How do you know there are plenty of failed tests that haven’t come to light? Do you have one concrete example of a fighter that’s failed a test that hasn’t come to light yet?

What’s the technicality that Fury has?
Fury's didn't come to light for the first 14 months. He was allowed to fight Klitschko fight. Ask yourself why that didn't come to light? He failed a test for one of Fwank's shows and UKADA didn't release publicly. Why? Because boxing is corrupt.

Concrete proof? Oscar Rivas failed a test in the buildup to the Whyte fight and it only came to light when Whyte failed.
None of that answered my questions re: Fury supposedly failing a test in the last 12 months or fighters having bans that haven’t come to light.

I agree it was stupid how long it took for Fury’s failure several years ago to come to light. My understanding is that it was due to a backlog with UKAD.
jwfg
Super Flyweight
Posts: 2607
Joined: 11 Mar 2023, 19:21

Re: Fury vs Ngannou

Post by jwfg »

maverick23 wrote: 13 Oct 2023, 12:41 [I agree it was stupid how long it took
Stupid? No. Corrupt? Yes.
jwfg
Super Flyweight
Posts: 2607
Joined: 11 Mar 2023, 19:21

Re: Fury vs Ngannou

Post by jwfg »

jwfg wrote: 13 Oct 2023, 12:46
maverick23 wrote: 13 Oct 2023, 12:41 [I agree it was stupid how long it took
Stupid? No. Corrupt? Yes.
Regarding the failed Hammer test....

"UKAD will not discuss or disclose details of any cases until due legal process has been completed”

Now, if you were the boxer involved, would you.......

A. Comply with the legal process.
B. Get your lawyers to delay, delay, delay.
maverick23
Cruiserweight
Posts: 10375
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20

Re: Fury vs Ngannou

Post by maverick23 »

jwfg wrote: 13 Oct 2023, 12:46
maverick23 wrote: 13 Oct 2023, 12:41 [I agree it was stupid how long it took
Stupid? No. Corrupt? Yes.
I don’t know the facts so can’t comment on whether it was corrupt. From what I read it was due to UKAD being under resourced and having a massive backlog on testing.

Anyway, back to present day Fury. What test did he fail? UKAD? VADA? Another? What’s the technicality that you mentioned?
jwfg
Super Flyweight
Posts: 2607
Joined: 11 Mar 2023, 19:21

Re: Fury vs Ngannou

Post by jwfg »

maverick23 wrote: 13 Oct 2023, 12:53
jwfg wrote: 13 Oct 2023, 12:46
maverick23 wrote: 13 Oct 2023, 12:41 [I agree it was stupid how long it took
Stupid? No. Corrupt? Yes.
I don’t know the facts so can’t comment on whether it was corrupt. From what I read it was due to UKAD being under resourced and having a massive backlog on testing.

Anyway, back to present day Fury. What test did he fail? UKAD? VADA? Another? What’s the technicality that you mentioned?
He failed a PED test. silly. I wasn't told the agency, Which technicality? Delay, delay, delay.
maverick23
Cruiserweight
Posts: 10375
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20

Re: Fury vs Ngannou

Post by maverick23 »

jwfg wrote: 13 Oct 2023, 14:34
maverick23 wrote: 13 Oct 2023, 12:53
jwfg wrote: 13 Oct 2023, 12:46

Stupid? No. Corrupt? Yes.
I don’t know the facts so can’t comment on whether it was corrupt. From what I read it was due to UKAD being under resourced and having a massive backlog on testing.

Anyway, back to present day Fury. What test did he fail? UKAD? VADA? Another? What’s the technicality that you mentioned?
He failed a PED test. silly. I wasn't told the agency, Which technicality? Delay, delay, delay.
So you’ve been told he failed a PED test and is delaying the results coming out. Unless it’s from an excellent source I’d be inclined to not believe it.

So if he’s delaying the case being heard then why announce a fight with Usyk? Also after the way Warren’s gone after Eddie with the Benn stuff, I can’t see him doing that aggressively when he’s got a ticking time bomb on his hands.

Was the test failure in relation to the Chisora fight? Assume that will be made a no-contest if so.
jwfg
Super Flyweight
Posts: 2607
Joined: 11 Mar 2023, 19:21

Re: Fury vs Ngannou

Post by jwfg »

maverick23 wrote: 13 Oct 2023, 14:43
jwfg wrote: 13 Oct 2023, 14:34
maverick23 wrote: 13 Oct 2023, 12:53

I don’t know the facts so can’t comment on whether it was corrupt. From what I read it was due to UKAD being under resourced and having a massive backlog on testing.

Anyway, back to present day Fury. What test did he fail? UKAD? VADA? Another? What’s the technicality that you mentioned?
He failed a PED test. silly. I wasn't told the agency, Which technicality? Delay, delay, delay.
So you’ve been told he failed a PED test and is delaying the results coming out. Unless it’s from an excellent source I’d be inclined to not believe it.

So if he’s delaying the case being heard then why announce a fight with Usyk? Also after the way Warren’s gone after Eddie with the Benn stuff, I can’t see him doing that aggressively when he’s got a ticking time bomb on his hands.

Was the test failure in relation to the Chisora fight? Assume that will be made a no-contest if so.
If you don't believe me, don't believe me.

Just to clarify, unless this is 'leaked' to the media, Fury will never be punished. Make of that what you will.

Even if it does come out, there won't be a no contest. His fight with Hammer wasn't.
polecateddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Fury vs Ngannou

Post by polecateddy »

Do UKAD just agree to keep it confidential, or has Fury’s legal team taken out a super-injunction on UKAD to keep it quiet?
quickeyg
Super Featherweight
Posts: 599
Joined: 24 Nov 2018, 06:28

Re: Fury vs Ngannou - If you seek you shall find.

Post by quickeyg »

jwfg wrote: 13 Oct 2023, 12:33
maverick23 wrote: 13 Oct 2023, 10:14
jwfg wrote: 13 Oct 2023, 09:57

There are plenty of failed tests that don't come to light. Fury is riding it out due to a technicality. By early next year, he'll be able to have a sanctioned fight again under proper boxing rules.
I think we’ve been through this before.

How do you know there are plenty of failed tests that haven’t come to light? Do you have one concrete example of a fighter that’s failed a test that hasn’t come to light yet?

What’s the technicality that Fury has?
Fury's didn't come to light for the first 14 months. He was allowed to fight Klitschko fight. Ask yourself why that didn't come to light? He failed a test for one of Fwank's shows and UKADA didn't release publicly. Why? Because boxing is corrupt.

Concrete proof? Oscar Rivas failed a test in the buildup to the Whyte fight and it only came to light when Whyte failed.

Oscar Rivas never failed a test - Spencer Fearon put out some propaganda.

We all know Dillian Whyte failed tests were covered up - Rivas's team were never informed.

As for Tyson Fury he was framed by that secret society for speaking up about j*ws, g*ys and devil worshippers - there are 33rd degree freemasons in many levels of society including sports.


This secret society planned and carried out recent wars (false flag attacks)


Call themselves 'illuminati'

Number 1 rule is - to tell you what they do, before they do it.
emallini
Middleweight
Posts: 1676
Joined: 08 Nov 2013, 12:31

Re: Fury vs Ngannou

Post by emallini »

This fight is dirt
quickeyg
Super Featherweight
Posts: 599
Joined: 24 Nov 2018, 06:28

Re: Fury vs Ngannou

Post by quickeyg »

Knowledge is power.
big lennox
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2550
Joined: 06 Feb 2004, 13:44

Re: Fury vs Ngannou

Post by big lennox »

emallini wrote: 13 Oct 2023, 16:09 This fight is dirt
Absolutely. It's shameful to pit a Heavyweight Champion against an aged non boxer who has never boxed.

The only thing I hope is that the fighters on the undercard take the opportunity to really impress a wide audience.

I sincerely hope that Fury vs Uysk, with a date and venue, is formally announced immediately afterwards. Otherwise, Furys legacy really will be lamentable.
jwfg
Super Flyweight
Posts: 2607
Joined: 11 Mar 2023, 19:21

Re: Fury vs Ngannou - If you seek you shall find.

Post by jwfg »

quickeyg wrote: 13 Oct 2023, 15:52 speaking up about j*ws,
What did he say about Jews? Do you agree with him?
SeanBrennan
Bantamweight
Posts: 9951
Joined: 12 Feb 2022, 12:45

Re: Fury vs Ngannou - If you seek you shall find.

Post by SeanBrennan »

jwfg wrote: 13 Oct 2023, 16:37
quickeyg wrote: 13 Oct 2023, 15:52 speaking up about j*ws,
What did he say about Jews? Do you agree with him?
I'm intrigued, and now awaiting the incoming braindead fascist drivel....
quickeyg
Super Featherweight
Posts: 599
Joined: 24 Nov 2018, 06:28

Re: Fury vs Ngannou

Post by quickeyg »

Malcolm X said:


If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing.
polecateddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Fury vs Ngannou

Post by polecateddy »

Is the PPV price for this actually $79.99 in The States? That’s just under £66. It’s a bit mind-boggling, considering Ngannou didn’t even progress from having a bit of amateur boxing training in French gyms to an actual amateur boxing bout! Presumably he was just rubbish at it!
SeanBrennan
Bantamweight
Posts: 9951
Joined: 12 Feb 2022, 12:45

Re: Fury vs Ngannou

Post by SeanBrennan »

polecateddy wrote: 14 Oct 2023, 13:39 Is the PPV price for this actually $79.99 in The States? That’s just under £66. It’s a bit mind-boggling, considering Ngannou didn’t even progress from having a bit of amateur boxing training in French gyms to an actual amateur boxing bout! Presumably he was just rubbish at it!
I'm not sure, think he just ended up in MMA as oppsosed to being naturally rubbish at boxing.
He has no chance in this fight though.
Nightmare Roy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16864
Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29

Re: Fury vs Ngannou

Post by Nightmare Roy »

polecateddy wrote: 14 Oct 2023, 13:39 Is the PPV price for this actually $79.99 in The States? That’s just under £66. It’s a bit mind-boggling, considering Ngannou didn’t even progress from having a bit of amateur boxing training in French gyms to an actual amateur boxing bout! Presumably he was just rubbish at it!
It does seem a crazy price but then all their PPVs are extortionate, they all tend to be $60 to $100, They must all be rich, in the UK we balk at anything over £20! I imagine we will get shafted for about £30 for Usyk Fury but I'll actually buy that one
polecateddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Fury vs Ngannou

Post by polecateddy »

SeanBrennan wrote: 14 Oct 2023, 14:09
polecateddy wrote: 14 Oct 2023, 13:39 Is the PPV price for this actually $79.99 in The States? That’s just under £66. It’s a bit mind-boggling, considering Ngannou didn’t even progress from having a bit of amateur boxing training in French gyms to an actual amateur boxing bout! Presumably he was just rubbish at it!
I'm not sure, think he just ended up in MMA as oppsosed to being naturally rubbish at boxing.
He has no chance in this fight though.
Or any credible professional fight effectively.
SeanBrennan
Bantamweight
Posts: 9951
Joined: 12 Feb 2022, 12:45

Re: Fury vs Ngannou

Post by SeanBrennan »

polecateddy wrote: 14 Oct 2023, 14:23
SeanBrennan wrote: 14 Oct 2023, 14:09
polecateddy wrote: 14 Oct 2023, 13:39 Is the PPV price for this actually $79.99 in The States? That’s just under £66. It’s a bit mind-boggling, considering Ngannou didn’t even progress from having a bit of amateur boxing training in French gyms to an actual amateur boxing bout! Presumably he was just rubbish at it!
I'm not sure, think he just ended up in MMA as oppsosed to being naturally rubbish at boxing.
He has no chance in this fight though.
Or any credible professional fight effectively.
agree, would not win an Area title.
Kilburn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6685
Joined: 25 Jul 2002, 07:27

Re: Fury vs Ngannou

Post by Kilburn »

As pointless as this “fight” is, I wouldn’t have any hesitation in picking Ngannou over the likes of Johnny Fisher, in a boxing match.
jwfg
Super Flyweight
Posts: 2607
Joined: 11 Mar 2023, 19:21

Re: Fury vs Ngannou

Post by jwfg »

Kilburn wrote: 14 Oct 2023, 15:02 As pointless as this “fight” is, I wouldn’t have any hesitation in picking Ngannou over the likes of Johnny Fisher, in a boxing match.
No way he beats Fisher. No way, at all. Fisher would dominate him from start to finish. And yes, I've seen Jonny fight.
Post Reply