Tyson Fury’s real ranking in The Pantheon of HWs
-
SeanBrennan
- Bantamweight
- Posts: 9947
- Joined: 12 Feb 2022, 12:45
Re: Tyson Fury’s real ranking in The Pantheon of HWs
every single generation claims the 'monsters' of previous generation would beat the current generation. It's tedious and rarely true.
Ike is where he should be. In a cell.
Ike is where he should be. In a cell.
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32913
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Tyson Fury’s real ranking in The Pantheon of HWs
Boxing is probably worse than most sports when it comes to rose-tinted reminiscing of the past. But even so, it's obvious to anyone that the heavyweight division has been on its arse basically since Lennox retired. And it's not like it was unexpected - I clearly remember as a teenager in the 90s listening to experienced critics bemoaning the lack of quality in the pipeline for the heavies, with potential future stars being attracted to NFL / NBA instead (and now UFC is another viable option).SeanBrennan wrote: ↑30 Oct 2023, 16:38 every single generation claims the 'monsters' of previous generation would beat the current generation. It's tedious and rarely true.
You could probably pluck a random contender from the 70s into the current heavyweight scene, and he'd dominate with an iron fist. The quality just is not there; Fury, Wilder & Joshua would be nowhere near the top in another era.
Re: Tyson Fury’s real ranking in The Pantheon of HWs
Very good docSeanBrennan wrote: ↑30 Oct 2023, 16:38thanks, going to give it a watch.polecateddy wrote: ↑30 Oct 2023, 16:10 Killer Inside: The Mind of Aaron Hernandez Is a good one to watch of Netflix. Shows how much off the rails people can go with that sort of brain injury. Chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE).
Re: Tyson Fury’s real ranking in The Pantheon of HWs
Not half as tedious as the repeated claims that someone like Tyson Fury could seriously compete on any level, with the greatest heavyweight boxers in history.SeanBrennan wrote: ↑30 Oct 2023, 16:38 every single generation claims the 'monsters' of previous generation would beat the current generation. It's tedious and rarely true.
-
polecateddy
- Heavyweight

Re: Tyson Fury’s real ranking in The Pantheon of HWs
Yes there’s plenty of gems on the forum, like this one from mickey1975 in July;Kilburn wrote: ↑30 Oct 2023, 18:00Not half as tedious as the repeated claims that someone like Tyson Fury could seriously compete on any level, with the greatest heavyweight boxers in history.SeanBrennan wrote: ↑30 Oct 2023, 16:38 every single generation claims the 'monsters' of previous generation would beat the current generation. It's tedious and rarely true.
‘Top 20 (all-time great) so far. Unbeaten. That will count for a lot if it stays the same. I expect he will be mentioned as top ten by most, just as Mike Tyson is although in my eyes he is just outside. The vast majority of people just don’t have the time or interest to scrutinise the records intensely. I see the AJ fight as a formality but beating Usyk would be nice. No doubt on here he will be ridiculously low but this isn’t a genuine reflection of people’s opinion, The undefeated heavyweight champion of the world who conquered mental health, WWE and the UFC, what a legacy.‘
Re: Tyson Fury’s real ranking in The Pantheon of HWs
It's a Bad era because it's not as good as the 2nd best era ever?polecateddy wrote: ↑30 Oct 2023, 15:43 We’re certainly over that hump now where routinely on this forum people would declare Joshua, Fury, Wilder and Usyk as better than Holyfield, Bowe, sometimes even Lewis. There’s a harsh dose of reality now that clearly they aren’t made of that special stuff. It’s just a bad era end of story!
I'd say generally speaking we're in a fairly good era of Heavyweights. Certainly an era where everyone is much more physically imposing. Even with the 70's and 90's it's not as if the entire Top 10 of that time would kick the asses of all of the top guys of this era.
Styles make fights. Then and now.
There isn't an era or generation of fighters where every single one of them is better than every single fighter from another era.
Re: Tyson Fury’s real ranking in The Pantheon of HWs
I just don't put much stock in a guy that f*cked it all up before he even got his shot to compete at the top. What we think he might've done is irrelevant.jamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑30 Oct 2023, 16:02Not a fan?gilgamesh wrote: ↑30 Oct 2023, 13:49Ibeabuchi is a f*cking loser, and his legacy is that he's a f*cking loser.polecateddy wrote: ↑29 Oct 2023, 17:15
It is frightening to think what Ibeabuchi would have done to Fury last night. It would have been like Ngganou's best flurry coming at him constantly for as long as Fury could last, which is probably 5 rounds.
I don't give him credit of "He could've" beat any Heavyweight.
I thought he didn't deserve the decision over Tua, and he showed what kinda human being he was afterward. F*ck that guy.
Fact is, he couldn't keep out of Prison. So he ain't beating nobody is he?
-
Frostieballs
- Super Bantamweight
- Posts: 2023
- Joined: 15 Aug 2020, 17:38
Re: Tyson Fury’s real ranking in The Pantheon of HWs
I don’t prefer heavyweight boxers from the past because I necessarily think they would beat their modern day counterparts.Boxerbeetle wrote: ↑30 Oct 2023, 17:20Boxing is probably worse than most sports when it comes to rose-tinted reminiscing of the past. But even so, it's obvious to anyone that the heavyweight division has been on its arse basically since Lennox retired. And it's not like it was unexpected - I clearly remember as a teenager in the 90s listening to experienced critics bemoaning the lack of quality in the pipeline for the heavies, with potential future stars being attracted to NFL / NBA instead (and now UFC is another viable option).SeanBrennan wrote: ↑30 Oct 2023, 16:38 every single generation claims the 'monsters' of previous generation would beat the current generation. It's tedious and rarely true.
You could probably pluck a random contender from the 70s into the current heavyweight scene, and he'd dominate with an iron fist. The quality just is not there; Fury, Wilder & Joshua would be nowhere near the top in another era.
The fights were just better. A lot of over cautious jab flicking and snooze fests now. Wlad-Fury being the number one example.
-
SeanBrennan
- Bantamweight
- Posts: 9947
- Joined: 12 Feb 2022, 12:45
Re: Tyson Fury’s real ranking in The Pantheon of HWs
I guess we'll never know. The fighters are bigger now, and have access to PEDS etc, how much impact that would have you can't really quantify. I am of course biased towards 90s as that's when I first started watching.
-
SeanBrennan
- Bantamweight
- Posts: 9947
- Joined: 12 Feb 2022, 12:45
Re: Tyson Fury’s real ranking in The Pantheon of HWs
it was chuffin brilliantsi7dog7 wrote: ↑30 Oct 2023, 17:21Very good docSeanBrennan wrote: ↑30 Oct 2023, 16:38thanks, going to give it a watch.polecateddy wrote: ↑30 Oct 2023, 16:10 Killer Inside: The Mind of Aaron Hernandez Is a good one to watch of Netflix. Shows how much off the rails people can go with that sort of brain injury. Chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE).
Re: Tyson Fury’s real ranking in The Pantheon of HWs
No Randall Cobb?margaret thatcher wrote: ↑24 Oct 2023, 15:46 all time top 10
1. fury
2. wilder
3. wlad
4. otto wallin
5. chisora
6. steve cunningham
7. ali
8. louis
9. foreman
10. holmes