Re-watching Fury v McDermott 1

Post Reply
si7dog7
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1009
Joined: 26 Feb 2013, 14:42

Re-watching Fury v McDermott 1

Post by si7dog7 »

How do you score it?
8-2 was a travesty tbh.

In terms of registering punches - John
At range -Fury

6-4 either way acceptable for me.
I was in Brentwood that night. I thought John won at the time. Still do, but can see how Red scored โ€œhis wayโ€๐Ÿ˜‚

Still to this day think a John was very much like Danny Williams.
They nearly had the whole ticket. Just missing that one thing.
JamesPhilips
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 6552
Joined: 19 Mar 2021, 06:43

Re: Re-watching Fury v McDermott 1

Post by JamesPhilips »

si7dog7 wrote: โ†‘08 Nov 2023, 09:40 How do you score it?
8-2 was a travesty tbh.

In terms of registering punches - John
At range -Fury

6-4 either way acceptable for me.
I was in Brentwood that night. I thought John won at the time. Still do, but can see how Red scored โ€œhis wayโ€๐Ÿ˜‚

Still to this day think a John was very much like Danny Williams.
They nearly had the whole ticket. Just missing that one thing.
What John was missing was a good diet, better fitness and most of all PEDs
Glass Joe
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 5005
Joined: 08 Feb 2012, 10:29

Re: Re-watching Fury v McDermott 1

Post by Glass Joe »

I was also there that night behind fury supporters who refused to sit down and the security were too scared to tell them to sit down haha. I enjoyed watching Mcdermott. Was a lovable loser, should have had a few decisions go his way. As James said can only go so far being Natural.
JamesPhilips
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 6552
Joined: 19 Mar 2021, 06:43

Re: Re-watching Fury v McDermott 1

Post by JamesPhilips »

Glass Joe wrote: โ†‘08 Nov 2023, 11:28 I was also there that night behind fury supporters who refused to sit down and the security were too scared to tell them to sit down haha. I enjoyed watching Mcdermott. Was a lovable loser, should have had a few decisions go his way. As James said can only go so far being Natural.
Yup McDermott one of the few fighters along with Calzaghe who were def natural. Anyone know what big Johnโ€™s doing now?
Oiky
Super Welterweight
Posts: 7275
Joined: 16 Feb 2015, 09:22

Re: Re-watching Fury v McDermott 1

Post by Oiky »

JamesPhilips wrote: โ†‘08 Nov 2023, 22:01
Glass Joe wrote: โ†‘08 Nov 2023, 11:28 I was also there that night behind fury supporters who refused to sit down and the security were too scared to tell them to sit down haha. I enjoyed watching Mcdermott. Was a lovable loser, should have had a few decisions go his way. As James said can only go so far being Natural.
Yup McDermott one of the few fighters along with Calzaghe who were def natural. Anyone know what big Johnโ€™s doing now?
Runs a waste clearance and property services company
SeanBrennan
Bantamweight
Posts: 9948
Joined: 12 Feb 2022, 12:45

Re: Re-watching Fury v McDermott 1

Post by SeanBrennan »

si7dog7 wrote: โ†‘08 Nov 2023, 09:40 How do you score it?
8-2 was a travesty tbh.

In terms of registering punches - John
At range -Fury

6-4 either way acceptable for me.
I was in Brentwood that night. I thought John won at the time. Still do, but can see how Red scored โ€œhis wayโ€๐Ÿ˜‚

Still to this day think a John was very much like Danny Williams.
They nearly had the whole ticket. Just missing that one thing.
interesting take as you were there live. In time people's memories of this (most of whom I suspect never watched it live or since) claim McDermott won by 56 rounds. I've watched it since and scored it by 2 to McDermott, but you're right it was not a landslide either way. It's here if anyone wants to watch and score
JamesPhilips
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 6552
Joined: 19 Mar 2021, 06:43

Re: Re-watching Fury v McDermott 1

Post by JamesPhilips »

Oiky wrote: โ†‘09 Nov 2023, 03:04
JamesPhilips wrote: โ†‘08 Nov 2023, 22:01
Glass Joe wrote: โ†‘08 Nov 2023, 11:28 I was also there that night behind fury supporters who refused to sit down and the security were too scared to tell them to sit down haha. I enjoyed watching Mcdermott. Was a lovable loser, should have had a few decisions go his way. As James said can only go so far being Natural.
Yup McDermott one of the few fighters along with Calzaghe who were def natural. Anyone know what big Johnโ€™s doing now?
Runs a waste clearance and property services company
Sounds good
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27503
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: Re-watching Fury v McDermott 1

Post by stujones »

Anyone seen Fight 2 more recently - that seems to have been one of faded memories of a Fury masterclass - but from what I remember - Fury started off brilliant, McDermott was coming back into it - Fury was still ahead but it was closing rapidly until the clear KO.

Perhaps my memory was wrong, but fight 2 seems to have gone down the folklore of Fury now winning every second of every round (ala Klitchscko).
golden_labrador
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 1787
Joined: 25 Dec 2020, 18:18

Re: Re-watching Fury v McDermott 1

Post by golden_labrador »

stujones wrote: โ†‘09 Nov 2023, 09:19 Anyone seen Fight 2 more recently - that seems to have been one of faded memories of a Fury masterclass - but from what I remember - Fury started off brilliant, McDermott was coming back into it - Fury was still ahead but it was closing rapidly until the clear KO.

Perhaps my memory was wrong, but fight 2 seems to have gone down the folklore of Fury now winning every second of every round (ala Klitchscko).
i watched both fights the other day. McDermott gets tired quickly in fight 2, as was Fury tbh. Fury definitely boxed smarter in fight 2 and to me anyway was using his jab and speed better. it was still fairly close though until the knockdowns
deadpan
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3171
Joined: 22 Apr 2004, 04:46

Re: Re-watching Fury v McDermott 1

Post by deadpan »

Jeez, when you see Fury's ring walk with a car forecourt quality banner behind him, it's boggling to think that he would go on to be sitting on thrones and milking every moment of the electric atmosphere.
JamesPhilips
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 6552
Joined: 19 Mar 2021, 06:43

Re: Re-watching Fury v McDermott 1

Post by JamesPhilips »

SeanBrennan wrote: โ†‘09 Nov 2023, 07:37
si7dog7 wrote: โ†‘08 Nov 2023, 09:40 How do you score it?
8-2 was a travesty tbh.

In terms of registering punches - John
At range -Fury

6-4 either way acceptable for me.
I was in Brentwood that night. I thought John won at the time. Still do, but can see how Red scored โ€œhis wayโ€๐Ÿ˜‚

Still to this day think a John was very much like Danny Williams.
They nearly had the whole ticket. Just missing that one thing.
interesting take as you were there live. In time people's memories of this (most of whom I suspect never watched it live or since) claim McDermott won by 56 rounds. I've watched it since and scored it by 2 to McDermott, but you're right it was not a landslide either way. It's here if anyone wants to watch and score
I miss Tyson with hair and no beard
tony1234
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2170
Joined: 15 Sep 2009, 10:02

Re: Re-watching Fury v McDermott 1

Post by tony1234 »

Didn't realise it was over 14 years ago, that was just before the C5 nights when he was calling out Price and Bellew, another missed fight for Fury was Price and Bellew on the same night as he kept shouting for
Steveh583
Super Featherweight
Posts: 4375
Joined: 24 Nov 2018, 06:06

Re: Re-watching Fury v McDermott 1

Post by Steveh583 »

i thought fury won the first two and the last two, and many of the other rounds were down to what style you liked. it was similar to the francis fight in that regard. It certainly wasn't the "robbery" everyone made it out to be. Basically a closely contested fight. I thought some of the comments on here the following morning were ridiculous. I didnt watch it live but youtubed it the next day thinking I'd see just one way traffic.

Interestingly, I remember everyone saying he was exposed, would never accomplish anything and would never take the rematch after that fight too.

Fury should have got more credit for taking john in his tenth fight i thought.
Dan Dares
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1582
Joined: 29 Nov 2010, 16:33

Re: Re-watching Fury v McDermott 1

Post by Dan Dares »

golden_labrador wrote: โ†‘09 Nov 2023, 12:05
stujones wrote: โ†‘09 Nov 2023, 09:19 Anyone seen Fight 2 more recently - that seems to have been one of faded memories of a Fury masterclass - but from what I remember - Fury started off brilliant, McDermott was coming back into it - Fury was still ahead but it was closing rapidly until the clear KO.

Perhaps my memory was wrong, but fight 2 seems to have gone down the folklore of Fury now winning every second of every round (ala Klitchscko).
i watched both fights the other day. McDermott gets tired quickly in fight 2, as was Fury tbh. Fury definitely boxed smarter in fight 2 and to me anyway was using his jab and speed better. it was still fairly close though until the knockdowns
McDermott went to hospital after that fight. The Doctor told him he had glandular fever.
funso banjo baby
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4417
Joined: 23 Sep 2005, 11:05

Re: Re-watching Fury v McDermott 1

Post by funso banjo baby »

si7dog7 wrote: โ†‘08 Nov 2023, 09:40 How do you score it?
8-2 was a travesty tbh.

In terms of registering punches - John
At range -Fury

6-4 either way acceptable for me.
I was in Brentwood that night. I thought John won at the time. Still do, but can see how Red scored โ€œhis wayโ€๐Ÿ˜‚

Still to this day think a John was very much like Danny Williams.
They nearly had the whole ticket. Just missing that one thing.
I don't think we can compare John mcdermot`s career with Danny Williams.
SeanBrennan
Bantamweight
Posts: 9948
Joined: 12 Feb 2022, 12:45

Re: Re-watching Fury v McDermott 1

Post by SeanBrennan »

JamesPhilips wrote: โ†‘09 Nov 2023, 14:00
SeanBrennan wrote: โ†‘09 Nov 2023, 07:37
si7dog7 wrote: โ†‘08 Nov 2023, 09:40 How do you score it?
8-2 was a travesty tbh.

In terms of registering punches - John
At range -Fury

6-4 either way acceptable for me.
I was in Brentwood that night. I thought John won at the time. Still do, but can see how Red scored โ€œhis wayโ€๐Ÿ˜‚

Still to this day think a John was very much like Danny Williams.
They nearly had the whole ticket. Just missing that one thing.
interesting take as you were there live. In time people's memories of this (most of whom I suspect never watched it live or since) claim McDermott won by 56 rounds. I've watched it since and scored it by 2 to McDermott, but you're right it was not a landslide either way. It's here if anyone wants to watch and score
I miss Tyson with hair and no beard
I feel the same way about the wife.
SeanBrennan
Bantamweight
Posts: 9948
Joined: 12 Feb 2022, 12:45

Re: Re-watching Fury v McDermott 1

Post by SeanBrennan »

Steveh583 wrote: โ†‘09 Nov 2023, 15:56 i thought fury won the first two and the last two, and many of the other rounds were down to what style you liked. it was similar to the francis fight in that regard. It certainly wasn't the "robbery" everyone made it out to be. Basically a closely contested fight. I thought some of the comments on here the following morning were ridiculous. I didnt watch it live but youtubed it the next day thinking I'd see just one way traffic.

Interestingly, I remember everyone saying he was exposed, would never accomplish anything and would never take the rematch after that fight too.

Fury should have got more credit for taking john in his tenth fight i thought.
fair point, John was an underrated fighter so to take him in your 10th was no mean feat.
SeanBrennan
Bantamweight
Posts: 9948
Joined: 12 Feb 2022, 12:45

Re: Re-watching Fury v McDermott 1

Post by SeanBrennan »

Dan Dares wrote: โ†‘10 Nov 2023, 09:07
golden_labrador wrote: โ†‘09 Nov 2023, 12:05
stujones wrote: โ†‘09 Nov 2023, 09:19 Anyone seen Fight 2 more recently - that seems to have been one of faded memories of a Fury masterclass - but from what I remember - Fury started off brilliant, McDermott was coming back into it - Fury was still ahead but it was closing rapidly until the clear KO.

Perhaps my memory was wrong, but fight 2 seems to have gone down the folklore of Fury now winning every second of every round (ala Klitchscko).
i watched both fights the other day. McDermott gets tired quickly in fight 2, as was Fury tbh. Fury definitely boxed smarter in fight 2 and to me anyway was using his jab and speed better. it was still fairly close though until the knockdowns
McDermott went to hospital after that fight. The Doctor told him he had glandular fever.
Having had a glandular fever, bloody fair play for fighting with it. I couldn't get out of bed when I had it.
SeanBrennan
Bantamweight
Posts: 9948
Joined: 12 Feb 2022, 12:45

Re: Re-watching Fury v McDermott 1

Post by SeanBrennan »

JamesPhilips wrote: โ†‘09 Nov 2023, 09:02
Oiky wrote: โ†‘09 Nov 2023, 03:04
JamesPhilips wrote: โ†‘08 Nov 2023, 22:01
Yup McDermott one of the few fighters along with Calzaghe who were def natural. Anyone know what big Johnโ€™s doing now?
Runs a waste clearance and property services company
Sounds good
definitely, was always a likeable chap. Reminds me of Gorman, both travellers, similar build, very gentle types outside the ring, seemed to lack that oomph you'd expect of a pro HW.
goose 5
Super Featherweight
Posts: 6187
Joined: 12 Sep 2018, 20:20

Re: Re-watching Fury v McDermott 1

Post by goose 5 »

I had Fury winning the fight-close, but I forget exactly what my card was.
JamesPhilips
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 6552
Joined: 19 Mar 2021, 06:43

Re: Re-watching Fury v McDermott 1

Post by JamesPhilips »

SeanBrennan wrote: โ†‘10 Nov 2023, 13:05
JamesPhilips wrote: โ†‘09 Nov 2023, 14:00
SeanBrennan wrote: โ†‘09 Nov 2023, 07:37

interesting take as you were there live. In time people's memories of this (most of whom I suspect never watched it live or since) claim McDermott won by 56 rounds. I've watched it since and scored it by 2 to McDermott, but you're right it was not a landslide either way. It's here if anyone wants to watch and score
I miss Tyson with hair and no beard
I feel the same way about the wife.
Lol
SeanBrennan
Bantamweight
Posts: 9948
Joined: 12 Feb 2022, 12:45

Re: Re-watching Fury v McDermott 1

Post by SeanBrennan »

JamesPhilips wrote: โ†‘10 Nov 2023, 14:27
SeanBrennan wrote: โ†‘10 Nov 2023, 13:05
JamesPhilips wrote: โ†‘09 Nov 2023, 14:00

I miss Tyson with hair and no beard
I feel the same way about the wife.
Lol
she read this, I now own a dead arm
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13411
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Re-watching Fury v McDermott 1

Post by jameswilson »

Delete
Last edited by jameswilson on 11 Nov 2023, 18:01, edited 1 time in total.
JamesPhilips
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 6552
Joined: 19 Mar 2021, 06:43

Re: Re-watching Fury v McDermott 1

Post by JamesPhilips »

SeanBrennan wrote: โ†‘10 Nov 2023, 18:29
JamesPhilips wrote: โ†‘10 Nov 2023, 14:27
SeanBrennan wrote: โ†‘10 Nov 2023, 13:05

I feel the same way about the wife.
Lol
she read this, I now own a dead arm
Schoolboy error ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿผ
SeanBrennan
Bantamweight
Posts: 9948
Joined: 12 Feb 2022, 12:45

Re: Re-watching Fury v McDermott 1

Post by SeanBrennan »

JamesPhilips wrote: โ†‘10 Nov 2023, 18:59
SeanBrennan wrote: โ†‘10 Nov 2023, 18:29
JamesPhilips wrote: โ†‘10 Nov 2023, 14:27

Lol
she read this, I now own a dead arm
Schoolboy error ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿผ
worth it, she punched my weaker arm, I'm taking it as a PTS win
Post Reply