WBC ranks Francis Ngannou at number 10?!?

Post Reply
JamesPhilips
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 6553
Joined: 19 Mar 2021, 06:43

WBC ranks Francis Ngannou at number 10?!?

Post by JamesPhilips »

WBC announced a week ago that Francis Ngannou would be ranked at number 10.

WTF? Why hasn’t no one commented on this obscenity?? I would’ve thought the boxing world would be more vocal….

This is with 0-1 pro record and he gets WBC number 10

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/boxing/67395361

Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28489
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: WBC ranks Francis Ngannou at number 10?!?

Post by Coco »

So now is eligible to fight for the title.

Realistically we will be fighting the winner of Fury v Uysk
SeanBrennan
Bantamweight
Posts: 9948
Joined: 12 Feb 2022, 12:45

Re: WBC ranks Francis Ngannou at number 10?!?

Post by SeanBrennan »

tbf the last person to fight for the WBC title had 13 losses and was as relevant as a Betamax. It was preposterous but the HW division has become a comedy of errors so an MMA fighter with no experience being ranked seems apt.

We only need Fres Oquendo to get a title fight at 50 now to complete it.
JamesPhilips
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 6553
Joined: 19 Mar 2021, 06:43

Re: WBC ranks Francis Ngannou at number 10?!?

Post by JamesPhilips »

SeanBrennan wrote: 18 Nov 2023, 13:33 tbf the last person to fight for the WBC title had 13 losses and was as relevant as a Betamax. It was preposterous but the HW division has become a comedy of errors so an MMA fighter with no experience being ranked seems apt.

We only need Fres Oquendo to get a title fight at 50 now to complete it.
#WarFres
Nightmare Roy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16851
Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29

Re: WBC ranks Francis Ngannou at number 10?!?

Post by Nightmare Roy »

Coco wrote: 18 Nov 2023, 12:36 So now is eligible to fight for the title.

Realistically we will be fighting the winner of Fury v Uysk
I think if Usyk wins, he will pack it in.
tonyevs
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5844
Joined: 08 Feb 2004, 18:13

Re: WBC ranks Francis Ngannou at number 10?!?

Post by tonyevs »

The heavyweight division has been self-harming for many years now, and it appears to be at a crossroads of whether it stays true to the pugilist past or onto the celebrity YouTube path.

Ngannou loses to just about everyone in the WBC top 10.

I agree - I think Usyk retires win or lose next fight.
joshj909
Lightweight
Posts: 6008
Joined: 01 Dec 2017, 06:16

Re: WBC ranks Francis Ngannou at number 10?!?

Post by joshj909 »

Nightmare Roy wrote: 19 Nov 2023, 03:54
Coco wrote: 18 Nov 2023, 12:36 So now is eligible to fight for the title.

Realistically we will be fighting the winner of Fury v Uysk
I think if Usyk wins, he will pack it in.
I think he might give Hrgovic and/or Zhang a shot before hanging up the gloves. Fury retires if he wins, maybe after the rematch.
Nightmare Roy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16851
Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29

Re: WBC ranks Francis Ngannou at number 10?!?

Post by Nightmare Roy »

joshj909 wrote: 19 Nov 2023, 08:07
Nightmare Roy wrote: 19 Nov 2023, 03:54
Coco wrote: 18 Nov 2023, 12:36 So now is eligible to fight for the title.

Realistically we will be fighting the winner of Fury v Uysk
I think if Usyk wins, he will pack it in.
I think he might give Hrgovic and/or Zhang a shot before hanging up the gloves. Fury retires if he wins, maybe after the rematch.
I just cant see it, he will have made more money than he'll ever need and have completed boxing, can't see him risking that for fights paying less money, maybe if the chinese stump up ridiculous money. Think he's 38 soon too.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45234
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: WBC ranks Francis Ngannou at number 10?!?

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

tonyevs wrote: 19 Nov 2023, 06:07 The heavyweight division has been self-harming for many years now, and it appears to be at a crossroads of whether it stays true to the pugilist past or onto the celebrity YouTube path.

Ngannou loses to just about everyone in the WBC top 10.

I agree - I think Usyk retires win or lose next fight.
There will be a rematch clause for sure.
tonyevs
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5844
Joined: 08 Feb 2004, 18:13

Re: WBC ranks Francis Ngannou at number 10?!?

Post by tonyevs »

jamesmcdonnell wrote: 19 Nov 2023, 10:55
tonyevs wrote: 19 Nov 2023, 06:07 The heavyweight division has been self-harming for many years now, and it appears to be at a crossroads of whether it stays true to the pugilist past or onto the celebrity YouTube path.

Ngannou loses to just about everyone in the WBC top 10.

I agree - I think Usyk retires win or lose next fight.
There will be a rematch clause for sure.
Yes. But I not convinced Usyk would be chasing that. I get the impression its all about legacy and walking away undefeated is as good as it`ll get.

The Saudis would want the rematch for the next Riyadh season. That would mean potentially another 2 defences or the belts being stripped by then.
si7dog7
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1009
Joined: 26 Feb 2013, 14:42

Re: WBC ranks Francis Ngannou at number 10?!?

Post by si7dog7 »

If Usyk wins, (think he will tbh). If he loses a rematch I’d wager.
But if he wins….. (be in breach of Fury’s demands but hey ho…). Fury won’t want another loss. (He’d go for a last hurrah with Francis in Saudi).

Usyk will retire.
Nothing left to prove.
Lots of shekels and a legacy on a par with Lennox, Marciano and SOG.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45234
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: WBC ranks Francis Ngannou at number 10?!?

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

He could get sued to buggery if he welches on rematch clause
si7dog7
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1009
Joined: 26 Feb 2013, 14:42

Re: WBC ranks Francis Ngannou at number 10?!?

Post by si7dog7 »

jamesmcdonnell wrote: 19 Nov 2023, 13:23 He could get sued to buggery if he welches on rematch clause
Can you imagine those shenanigans? It’s all one way imho. If Uysk loses. Done. Fury. Well he wouldn’t let it lie.
SeanBrennan
Bantamweight
Posts: 9948
Joined: 12 Feb 2022, 12:45

Re: WBC ranks Francis Ngannou at number 10?!?

Post by SeanBrennan »

JamesPhilips wrote: 18 Nov 2023, 17:29
SeanBrennan wrote: 18 Nov 2023, 13:33 tbf the last person to fight for the WBC title had 13 losses and was as relevant as a Betamax. It was preposterous but the HW division has become a comedy of errors so an MMA fighter with no experience being ranked seems apt.

We only need Fres Oquendo to get a title fight at 50 now to complete it.
#WarFres
hahahahaah #Stillshiftyat50
SeanBrennan
Bantamweight
Posts: 9948
Joined: 12 Feb 2022, 12:45

Re: WBC ranks Francis Ngannou at number 10?!?

Post by SeanBrennan »

si7dog7 wrote: 19 Nov 2023, 13:27
jamesmcdonnell wrote: 19 Nov 2023, 13:23 He could get sued to buggery if he welches on rematch clause
Can you imagine those shenanigans? It’s all one way imho. If Uysk loses. Done. Fury. Well he wouldn’t let it lie.
I want Welch to have a contentious victory and refuse to fight them again just so we can say he Welched at the rematch.

I need to get out more..
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46864
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: WBC ranks Francis Ngannou at number 10?!?

Post by gilgamesh »

It's really not that crazy to think a guy who lost a Split Decision that is hotly debated against the Heavyweight Champion earned himself a ranking with his performance.

If I were Ngannou's people I'd take advantage of the publicity from all this, and get him a couple of fights against chinny guys that are outside the Top 30 ASAP.

I think I'd only have Francis fight a few guys of that type though since obviously the demand will be to see him against quality opponents. At least until he gets beaten decisively.
coneye
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8602
Joined: 21 Jun 2004, 06:00

Re: WBC ranks Francis Ngannou at number 10?!?

Post by coneye »

jamesmcdonnell wrote: 19 Nov 2023, 13:23 He could get sued to buggery if he welches on rematch clause
Can't get sued for not having a rematch , when the doc says your not fit ,, did'nt Fury say december was contracted and if Usyk did'nt fight he would get sued , now its changed what was it Frank said he got injured
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45234
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: WBC ranks Francis Ngannou at number 10?!?

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

coneye wrote: 20 Nov 2023, 12:54
jamesmcdonnell wrote: 19 Nov 2023, 13:23 He could get sued to buggery if he welches on rematch clause
Can't get sued for not having a rematch , when the doc says your not fit ,, did'nt Fury say december was contracted and if Usyk did'nt fight he would get sued , now its changed what was it Frank said he got injured
You can't be sued for delaying it, but you could be fir refusing to do it full stop.

I suppose you could concoct it so you said you've retired over doctors advice
maverick23
Cruiserweight
Posts: 10375
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20

Re: WBC ranks Francis Ngannou at number 10?!?

Post by maverick23 »

jamesmcdonnell wrote: 20 Nov 2023, 13:53
coneye wrote: 20 Nov 2023, 12:54
jamesmcdonnell wrote: 19 Nov 2023, 13:23 He could get sued to buggery if he welches on rematch clause
Can't get sued for not having a rematch , when the doc says your not fit ,, did'nt Fury say december was contracted and if Usyk did'nt fight he would get sued , now its changed what was it Frank said he got injured
You can't be sued for delaying it, but you could be fir refusing to do it full stop.

I suppose you could concoct it so you said you've retired over doctors advice
He welched on the rematch with Klitschko and I don’t think he got sued for it.

He could easily get a Doctor to write something saying he shouldn’t be fighting. He gets punched in the head for a living and may not even need to lie, which he seems to do fairly often, to get a Doctor to medically retire him.
si7dog7
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1009
Joined: 26 Feb 2013, 14:42

Re: WBC ranks Francis Ngannou at number 10?!?

Post by si7dog7 »

He’s #10 0-1 re a very very close decision re the WBC (😂) Champion

So when Usyk wins, and he will, where does that leave the WBc #10?

Let’s be honest now.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45234
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: WBC ranks Francis Ngannou at number 10?!?

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

maverick23 wrote: 20 Nov 2023, 15:44
jamesmcdonnell wrote: 20 Nov 2023, 13:53
coneye wrote: 20 Nov 2023, 12:54

Can't get sued for not having a rematch , when the doc says your not fit ,, did'nt Fury say december was contracted and if Usyk did'nt fight he would get sued , now its changed what was it Frank said he got injured
You can't be sued for delaying it, but you could be fir refusing to do it full stop.

I suppose you could concoct it so you said you've retired over doctors advice
He welched on the rematch with Klitschko and I don’t think he got sued for it.

He could easily get a Doctor to write something saying he shouldn’t be fighting. He gets punched in the head for a living and may not even need to lie, which he seems to do fairly often, to get a Doctor to medically retire him.
That may be because Wlad chose not to sue though, doesn't mean he couldn't have.
coneye
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8602
Joined: 21 Jun 2004, 06:00

Re: WBC ranks Francis Ngannou at number 10?!?

Post by coneye »

jamesmcdonnell wrote: 20 Nov 2023, 19:06
maverick23 wrote: 20 Nov 2023, 15:44
jamesmcdonnell wrote: 20 Nov 2023, 13:53
You can't be sued for delaying it, but you could be fir refusing to do it full stop.

I suppose you could concoct it so you said you've retired over doctors advice
He welched on the rematch with Klitschko and I don’t think he got sued for it.

He could easily get a Doctor to write something saying he shouldn’t be fighting. He gets punched in the head for a living and may not even need to lie, which he seems to do fairly often, to get a Doctor to medically retire him.
That may be because Wlad chose not to sue though, doesn't mean he couldn't have.
Its easy James , Fury just got it delayed because he was injured , which can be read , unfit to fight , what was wrong black eye was'nt it , , a Harley st specelist gives any boxer a note for 6 months , then another , , theres NO WAY is anyone gonna try and sue , can't go against the doctor , he's the man
Post Reply