McGuigan' s facing liquidation

BigDoofus
Welterweight
Posts: 2182
Joined: 04 Apr 2016, 14:59

Re: McGuigan' s facing liquidation

Post by BigDoofus »

1303629 wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 09:28
BigDoofus wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 05:55
1303629 wrote: 03 Jan 2024, 18:57 Someone bought lingerie.... hanging offence.
Do you think it is acceptable to claim it from a fighter’s purse?
It would depend on what exactly is the fighters purse.
Could you at least explain when it is acceptable to claim lingerie expenses from a fighter’s purse?
Nightmare Roy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16389
Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29

Re: McGuigan' s facing liquidation

Post by Nightmare Roy »

BigDoofus wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 15:53
1303629 wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 09:28
BigDoofus wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 05:55

Do you think it is acceptable to claim it from a fighter’s purse?
It would depend on what exactly is the fighters purse.
Could you at least explain when it is acceptable to claim lingerie expenses from a fighter’s purse?
Didn't a Judge find the whole thing unacceptable?
1303629
Flyweight
Posts: 27
Joined: 05 Aug 2023, 10:56

Re: McGuigan' s facing liquidation

Post by 1303629 »

BigDoofus wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 15:53
1303629 wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 09:28
BigDoofus wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 05:55

Do you think it is acceptable to claim it from a fighter’s purse?
It would depend on what exactly is the fighters purse.
Could you at least explain when it is acceptable to claim lingerie expenses from a fighter’s purse?
It isn't but is that what happened? Did someone maybe do it by mistake? It's possible it could have been by mistake or Barry didn't know anything about it. That's two possibilities right there. It's not right but it's hardly a felony.
1303629
Flyweight
Posts: 27
Joined: 05 Aug 2023, 10:56

Re: McGuigan' s facing liquidation

Post by 1303629 »

Nightmare Roy wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 15:55
BigDoofus wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 15:53
1303629 wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 09:28
It would depend on what exactly is the fighters purse.
Could you at least explain when it is acceptable to claim lingerie expenses from a fighter’s purse?
Didn't a Judge find the whole thing unacceptable?
Was that something you read or was that documented in the case?
Nightmare Roy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16389
Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29

Re: McGuigan' s facing liquidation

Post by Nightmare Roy »

1303629 wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 16:30
Nightmare Roy wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 15:55
BigDoofus wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 15:53

Could you at least explain when it is acceptable to claim lingerie expenses from a fighter’s purse?
Didn't a Judge find the whole thing unacceptable?
Was that something you read or was that documented in the case?
Honestly don't know the ins and outs but didn't it go to court or get settled out of court, and Frampton was very happy with the outcome.

Edit, I see it was settled out of court without a judgement.
Last edited by Nightmare Roy on 04 Jan 2024, 16:36, edited 1 time in total.
1303629
Flyweight
Posts: 27
Joined: 05 Aug 2023, 10:56

Re: McGuigan' s facing liquidation

Post by 1303629 »

Nightmare Roy wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 16:31
1303629 wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 16:30
Nightmare Roy wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 15:55

Didn't a Judge find the whole thing unacceptable?
Was that something you read or was that documented in the case?
Honestly don't know the ins and outs but didn't it go to court or get settled out of court, and Frampton was very happy with the outcome.
Well maybe you shouldn't speculate.
Nightmare Roy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16389
Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29

Re: McGuigan' s facing liquidation

Post by Nightmare Roy »

1303629 wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 16:35
Nightmare Roy wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 16:31
1303629 wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 16:30
Was that something you read or was that documented in the case?
Honestly don't know the ins and outs but didn't it go to court or get settled out of court, and Frampton was very happy with the outcome.
Well maybe you shouldn't speculate.
I've edited my post if you have a look.
SeanBrennan
Bantamweight
Posts: 9634
Joined: 12 Feb 2022, 12:45

Re: McGuigan' s facing liquidation

Post by SeanBrennan »

BigDoofus wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 15:53
1303629 wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 09:28
BigDoofus wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 05:55

Do you think it is acceptable to claim it from a fighter’s purse?
It would depend on what exactly is the fighters purse.
Could you at least explain when it is acceptable to claim lingerie expenses from a fighter’s purse?
you can't and if you try to it's a pants excuse.
1303629
Flyweight
Posts: 27
Joined: 05 Aug 2023, 10:56

Re: McGuigan' s facing liquidation

Post by 1303629 »

SeanBrennan wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 16:39
BigDoofus wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 15:53
1303629 wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 09:28
It would depend on what exactly is the fighters purse.
Could you at least explain when it is acceptable to claim lingerie expenses from a fighter’s purse?
you can't and if you try to it's a pants excuse.
Does Bob Monkhouse help you with your replies.
SeanBrennan
Bantamweight
Posts: 9634
Joined: 12 Feb 2022, 12:45

Re: McGuigan' s facing liquidation

Post by SeanBrennan »

1303629 wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 16:41
SeanBrennan wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 16:39
BigDoofus wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 15:53

Could you at least explain when it is acceptable to claim lingerie expenses from a fighter’s purse?
you can't and if you try to it's a pants excuse.
Does Bob Monkhouse help you with your replies.
only since 2003
Cask
Bantamweight
Posts: 637
Joined: 09 Apr 2022, 18:22

Re: McGuigan' s facing liquidation

Post by Cask »

handsofstone wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 14:02 I remember before this all come out with Frampton most people had the upmost respect for all the McGuigan's but there was a few who had met Barry and said he wasn't what he seemed which from my view was a proper boxing man who cared about all fighters not his own, since then my view and more importantly his reputation has plummeted, stealing from someone you considered a son, doesn't get much lower


Think I've mentioned several hundred times on here that I'm named Barry purely because my dad was a fan and it was when he was in his pomp, not something I like to mention as much these days but I used to be quite chuffed, the truth will come out in the end I suppose, the guys a rat
Everybody knew McGuigan was an untrustworthy prick who says one thing for the cameras and another behind the scenes, what do you think the whole embarrassing Mr Eastwood thing was about?? Eastwood cleaned him in court, Harry took bad advice from his brother (tragically committed suicide over 30 years ago now I think)

We need one for Frampton now

Thank you very much Mr.Kinahan!!

1303629
Flyweight
Posts: 27
Joined: 05 Aug 2023, 10:56

Re: McGuigan' s facing liquidation

Post by 1303629 »

Cask wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 17:36
handsofstone wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 14:02 I remember before this all come out with Frampton most people had the upmost respect for all the McGuigan's but there was a few who had met Barry and said he wasn't what he seemed which from my view was a proper boxing man who cared about all fighters not his own, since then my view and more importantly his reputation has plummeted, stealing from someone you considered a son, doesn't get much lower


Think I've mentioned several hundred times on here that I'm named Barry purely because my dad was a fan and it was when he was in his pomp, not something I like to mention as much these days but I used to be quite chuffed, the truth will come out in the end I suppose, the guys a rat
Everybody knew McGuigan was an untrustworthy prick who says one thing for the cameras and another behind the scenes, what do you think the whole embarrassing Mr Eastwood thing was about?? Eastwood cleaned him in court, Harry took bad advice from his brother (tragically committed suicide over 30 years ago now I think)

We need one for Frampton now

Thank you very much Mr.Kinahan!!

What advice did he take from his brother and where did you get that information from?
Cask
Bantamweight
Posts: 637
Joined: 09 Apr 2022, 18:22

Re: McGuigan' s facing liquidation

Post by Cask »

1303629 wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 17:48
Cask wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 17:36
handsofstone wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 14:02 I remember before this all come out with Frampton most people had the upmost respect for all the McGuigan's but there was a few who had met Barry and said he wasn't what he seemed which from my view was a proper boxing man who cared about all fighters not his own, since then my view and more importantly his reputation has plummeted, stealing from someone you considered a son, doesn't get much lower


Think I've mentioned several hundred times on here that I'm named Barry purely because my dad was a fan and it was when he was in his pomp, not something I like to mention as much these days but I used to be quite chuffed, the truth will come out in the end I suppose, the guys a rat
Everybody knew McGuigan was an untrustworthy prick who says one thing for the cameras and another behind the scenes, what do you think the whole embarrassing Mr Eastwood thing was about?? Eastwood cleaned him in court, Harry took bad advice from his brother (tragically committed suicide over 30 years ago now I think)

We need one for Frampton now

Thank you very much Mr.Kinahan!!

What advice did he take from his brother and where did you get that information from?
Everybody in Ireland knows, gip Eastwood
1303629
Flyweight
Posts: 27
Joined: 05 Aug 2023, 10:56

Re: McGuigan' s facing liquidation

Post by 1303629 »

Everybody in Ireland knows, gip Eastwood
[/quote]

Stock answer with no substance.
Cask
Bantamweight
Posts: 637
Joined: 09 Apr 2022, 18:22

Re: McGuigan' s facing liquidation

Post by Cask »

Cuz he's dead
1303629
Flyweight
Posts: 27
Joined: 05 Aug 2023, 10:56

Re: McGuigan' s facing liquidation

Post by 1303629 »

Cask wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 17:58Cuz he's dead
Well aware of that but I'm asking you for your evidence that he was involved in the Eastwood case more than a substance less stock answer.
Cask
Bantamweight
Posts: 637
Joined: 09 Apr 2022, 18:22

Re: McGuigan' s facing liquidation

Post by Cask »

1303629 wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 18:01
Cask wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 17:58Cuz he's dead
Well aware of that but I'm asking you for your evidence that he was involved in the Eastwood case more than a substance less stock answer.
Lol you are a mcguigan aren't you? then you already know, fornicate off ya crooked pudendum
Cask
Bantamweight
Posts: 637
Joined: 09 Apr 2022, 18:22

Re: McGuigan' s facing liquidation

Post by Cask »

1303629 wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 18:01
Cask wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 17:58Cuz he's dead
Well aware of that but I'm asking you for your evidence that he was involved in the Eastwood case more than a substance less stock answer.
I think it would be "insensitive" to get into right here, but you'se fucked up more than once by now eh, slither back away under the rock
1303629
Flyweight
Posts: 27
Joined: 05 Aug 2023, 10:56

Re: McGuigan' s facing liquidation

Post by 1303629 »

Cask wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 18:06
1303629 wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 18:01
Cask wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 17:58Cuz he's dead
Well aware of that but I'm asking you for your evidence that he was involved in the Eastwood case more than a substance less stock answer.
I think it would be "insensitive" to get into right here, but you'se fucked up more than once by now eh, slither back away under the rock
Fill your boots. Get right into it. You're the one that referenced it so let's hear it. You say you know something and I'm asking you to explain the details and where you got that information from but you seem to be side stepping. As for slithering under a rock. Not happening.
SeanBrennan
Bantamweight
Posts: 9634
Joined: 12 Feb 2022, 12:45

Re: McGuigan' s facing liquidation

Post by SeanBrennan »

why don't we agree to disagree, it's only a forum.
1303629
Flyweight
Posts: 27
Joined: 05 Aug 2023, 10:56

Re: McGuigan' s facing liquidation

Post by 1303629 »

SeanBrennan wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 18:38 why don't we agree to disagree, it's only a forum.
Agree to disagree on what? I'm waiting for you to answer where you got the information from and what exactly it was. Then we can get into the agree to disagree. So again I'll ask you to explain exactly what you are talking about.
SeanBrennan
Bantamweight
Posts: 9634
Joined: 12 Feb 2022, 12:45

Re: McGuigan' s facing liquidation

Post by SeanBrennan »

1303629 wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 18:42
SeanBrennan wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 18:38 why don't we agree to disagree, it's only a forum.
Agree to disagree on what? I'm waiting for you to answer where you got the information from and what exactly it was. Then we can get into the agree to disagree. So again I'll ask you to explain exactly what you are talking about.
you're talking to the wrong person, check the thread. You can apologise after you have....
1303629
Flyweight
Posts: 27
Joined: 05 Aug 2023, 10:56

Re: McGuigan' s facing liquidation

Post by 1303629 »

SeanBrennan wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 18:45
1303629 wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 18:42
SeanBrennan wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 18:38 why don't we agree to disagree, it's only a forum.
Agree to disagree on what? I'm waiting for you to answer where you got the information from and what exactly it was. Then we can get into the agree to disagree. So again I'll ask you to explain exactly what you are talking about.
you're talking to the wrong person, check the thread. You can apologise after you have....
Well why the hell are you chipping in with agree to disagree then?
SeanBrennan
Bantamweight
Posts: 9634
Joined: 12 Feb 2022, 12:45

Re: McGuigan' s facing liquidation

Post by SeanBrennan »

1303629 wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 18:51
SeanBrennan wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 18:45
1303629 wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 18:42
Agree to disagree on what? I'm waiting for you to answer where you got the information from and what exactly it was. Then we can get into the agree to disagree. So again I'll ask you to explain exactly what you are talking about.
you're talking to the wrong person, check the thread. You can apologise after you have....
Well why the hell are you chipping in with agree to disagree then?
because it is a forum and any member can speak on it. I'll comment on what I like, don't get your Mrs Mcguigan's in a twist.
SeanBrennan
Bantamweight
Posts: 9634
Joined: 12 Feb 2022, 12:45

Re: McGuigan' s facing liquidation

Post by SeanBrennan »

Nightmare Roy wrote: 03 Jan 2024, 21:07
Coco wrote: 03 Jan 2024, 19:45
1303629 wrote: 03 Jan 2024, 18:57 Someone bought lingerie.... hanging offence.
So you would be happy for me to splash out on fancy knickers on your credit card Barry?
Get a curry for all the family too afterwards.
and some Kalms for 1303629
Locked