McGuigan' s facing liquidation

Cask
Bantamweight
Posts: 637
Joined: 09 Apr 2022, 18:22

Re: McGuigan' s facing liquidation

Post by Cask »

1303629 wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 18:51
SeanBrennan wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 18:45
1303629 wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 18:42
Agree to disagree on what? I'm waiting for you to answer where you got the information from and what exactly it was. Then we can get into the agree to disagree. So again I'll ask you to explain exactly what you are talking about.
you're talking to the wrong person, check the thread. You can apologise after you have....
Well why the hell are you chipping in with agree to disagree then?
See this is why I wasn't getting into it you silly bastard, there's no Wikipedia articles for this one, so leave it
1303629
Flyweight
Posts: 27
Joined: 05 Aug 2023, 10:56

Re: McGuigan' s facing liquidation

Post by 1303629 »

SeanBrennan wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 18:52
1303629 wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 18:51
SeanBrennan wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 18:45

you're talking to the wrong person, check the thread. You can apologise after you have....
Well why the hell are you chipping in with agree to disagree then?
because it is a forum and any member can speak on it. I'll comment on what I like, don't get your Mrs Mcguigan's in a twist.
Ok. Agree to disagree on what? That's aimed at you. I've read through the thread. What are you disagreeing with?
Cask
Bantamweight
Posts: 637
Joined: 09 Apr 2022, 18:22

Re: McGuigan' s facing liquidation

Post by Cask »

1303629 wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 19:01
SeanBrennan wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 18:52
1303629 wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 18:51
Well why the hell are you chipping in with agree to disagree then?
because it is a forum and any member can speak on it. I'll comment on what I like, don't get your Mrs Mcguigan's in a twist.
Ok. Agree to disagree on what? That's aimed at you. I've read through the thread. What are you disagreeing with?
Which McGuigan are ye
1303629
Flyweight
Posts: 27
Joined: 05 Aug 2023, 10:56

Re: McGuigan' s facing liquidation

Post by 1303629 »

Cask wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 19:03
1303629 wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 19:01
SeanBrennan wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 18:52

because it is a forum and any member can speak on it. I'll comment on what I like, don't get your Mrs Mcguigan's in a twist.
Ok. Agree to disagree on what? That's aimed at you. I've read through the thread. What are you disagreeing with?
Which McGuigan are ye
The one that's asking you a question.
SeanBrennan
Bantamweight
Posts: 9634
Joined: 12 Feb 2022, 12:45

Re: McGuigan' s facing liquidation

Post by SeanBrennan »

1303629 wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 19:09
Cask wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 19:03
1303629 wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 19:01
Ok. Agree to disagree on what? That's aimed at you. I've read through the thread. What are you disagreeing with?
Which McGuigan are ye
The one that's asking you a question.
don't worry Cask he'll settle out of court and then cry.
SeanBrennan
Bantamweight
Posts: 9634
Joined: 12 Feb 2022, 12:45

Re: McGuigan' s facing liquidation

Post by SeanBrennan »

1303629 wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 19:01
SeanBrennan wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 18:52
1303629 wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 18:51
Well why the hell are you chipping in with agree to disagree then?
because it is a forum and any member can speak on it. I'll comment on what I like, don't get your Mrs Mcguigan's in a twist.
Ok. Agree to disagree on what? That's aimed at you. I've read through the thread. What are you disagreeing with?
Your mum
1303629
Flyweight
Posts: 27
Joined: 05 Aug 2023, 10:56

Re: McGuigan' s facing liquidation

Post by 1303629 »

SeanBrennan wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 19:19
1303629 wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 19:01
SeanBrennan wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 18:52

because it is a forum and any member can speak on it. I'll comment on what I like, don't get your Mrs Mcguigan's in a twist.
Ok. Agree to disagree on what? That's aimed at you. I've read through the thread. What are you disagreeing with?
Your mum
See if you are going to chip in try and do it in a constructive manner. Now, what are we agreeing or disagreeing on? Please refrain from discussing my mum. She's been deceased for over 30 years.
SeanBrennan
Bantamweight
Posts: 9634
Joined: 12 Feb 2022, 12:45

Re: McGuigan' s facing liquidation

Post by SeanBrennan »

1303629 wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 19:24
SeanBrennan wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 19:19
1303629 wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 19:01
Ok. Agree to disagree on what? That's aimed at you. I've read through the thread. What are you disagreeing with?
Your mum
See if you are going to chip in try and do it in a constructive manner. Now, what are we agreeing or disagreeing on? Please refrain from discussing my mum. She's been deceased for over 30 years.
she's the lucky one, she doesn't have to read the drivel you write.
1303629
Flyweight
Posts: 27
Joined: 05 Aug 2023, 10:56

Re: McGuigan' s facing liquidation

Post by 1303629 »

SeanBrennan wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 19:24
1303629 wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 19:24
SeanBrennan wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 19:19

Your mum
See if you are going to chip in try and do it in a constructive manner. Now, what are we agreeing or disagreeing on? Please refrain from discussing my mum. She's been deceased for over 30 years.
she's the lucky one, she doesn't have to read the drivel you write.
Neither do you but here you are....
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32660
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: McGuigan' s facing liquidation

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Cask wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 17:36
handsofstone wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 14:02 I remember before this all come out with Frampton most people had the upmost respect for all the McGuigan's but there was a few who had met Barry and said he wasn't what he seemed which from my view was a proper boxing man who cared about all fighters not his own, since then my view and more importantly his reputation has plummeted, stealing from someone you considered a son, doesn't get much lower


Think I've mentioned several hundred times on here that I'm named Barry purely because my dad was a fan and it was when he was in his pomp, not something I like to mention as much these days but I used to be quite chuffed, the truth will come out in the end I suppose, the guys a rat
Everybody knew McGuigan was an untrustworthy prick who says one thing for the cameras and another behind the scenes, what do you think the whole embarrassing Mr Eastwood thing was about?? Eastwood cleaned him in court, Harry took bad advice from his brother (tragically committed suicide over 30 years ago now I think)

We need one for Frampton now

Thank you very much Mr.Kinahan!!

Father Ted and Father Stone :yay:
bogan whisperer
Middleweight
Posts: 1668
Joined: 15 Aug 2013, 19:24

Re: McGuigan' s facing liquidation

Post by bogan whisperer »

gerryd77 wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 10:32
1303629 wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 10:08
Coco wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 09:35

I'm saying that the McGuigans had a credit card paid out of Framptons expenses.
I think it's clear what I am saying Barry
So the credit card was in Barry's name?
You are the poster 'mcguigan' on OTH forum.
Clearly :OhYes:
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28310
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: McGuigan' s facing liquidation

Post by Coco »

bogan whisperer wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 20:24
gerryd77 wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 10:32
1303629 wrote: 04 Jan 2024, 10:08
So the credit card was in Barry's name?
You are the poster 'mcguigan' on OTH forum.
Clearly :OhYes:
And his silly outbursts have cemented his guilt in my eyes
jwfg
Super Flyweight
Posts: 2607
Joined: 11 Mar 2023, 19:21

Re: McGuigan' s facing liquidation

Post by jwfg »

Coco wrote: 29 Dec 2023, 17:25 I imagine many of the creditors are boxers, has Billiam-Smith been paid?
He'd be paying Shane, wouldn't he?
Coco
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 28310
Joined: 08 May 2007, 05:42

Re: McGuigan' s facing liquidation

Post by Coco »

jwfg wrote: 05 Jan 2024, 07:18
Coco wrote: 29 Dec 2023, 17:25 I imagine many of the creditors are boxers, has Billiam-Smith been paid?
He'd be paying Shane, wouldn't he?

While it shouldn't happen, boxers often get paid bottom end.
It's quite possible that CBS gets paid first, depends on the arrangement in place.
I bet Shane got paid before Frampton!
Locked