In Tajikistan with quality undercard just lastweek:
https://fightnews.com/nunez-overwhelms- ... ore-158544
BOXREC MISSING IMPORTANT IBF ELIMINATOR BOUT
Re: BOXREC MISSING IMPORTANT IBF ELIMINATOR BOUT
New IBF Mandatory Challenger Eduardo Nunez still hasnt had his record updated yet:1028865 wrote: ↑23 Feb 2024, 03:33 In Tajikistan with quality undercard just last week:
https://fightnews.com/nunez-overwhelms- ... ore-158544
https://boxrec.com/en/box-pro/733152
Doesnt any Moderator have the power to update his record?
Re: BOXREC MISSING IMPORTANT IBF ELIMINATOR BOUT
Here's video of Nunez stopping Rakhimov in their IBF Eliminator bout at 130 last week:1028865 wrote: ↑24 Feb 2024, 23:46New IBF Mandatory Challenger Eduardo Nunez still hasnt had his record updated yet:1028865 wrote: ↑23 Feb 2024, 03:33 In Tajikistan with quality undercard just last week:
https://fightnews.com/nunez-overwhelms- ... ore-158544
https://boxrec.com/en/box-pro/733152
Doesnt any Moderator have the power to update his record?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WrZHHmQ ... nte_Boxing
-
margaret thatcher
- Featherweight
- Posts: 39219
- Joined: 22 Jul 2019, 15:43
Re: BOXREC MISSING IMPORTANT IBF ELIMINATOR BOUT
i think by this point the issue isnt proving the fight actually happened..........clearly something on the administrative side, i dunno what
Re: BOXREC MISSING IMPORTANT IBF ELIMINATOR BOUT
The bout isn't missing. For some unspecified reason, it's listed as "SUB-pro" thus messing up the fighters' "Box-pro" records and their ratings (as of now, Rakhimov, who lost, is listed at #4 in BoxRec's super featherweight ratings and the winner, Nunez, is listed at #36).
