ROCKY FOUGHT OLD GUYS

Controversial
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9172
Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29

Post by Controversial »

BrocktonBlockbuster49 wrote:
Decagon wrote:That's not the worst. I hear some Marciano nuthuggers talking about how no one in the history of boxing could knock Rocky out, because he took the best punches from a 36-year-old middleweight.
ya thats defintley bad!



althought i wouldnt refer to anyone marciano faced as a "middleweight". marciano never faced a guy that weighed less than 175lb.

Wrong. Marciano fought Bob Jefferson who weighted only 172lbs (12 stone 2lbs). Rocky was only 178lbs (12 stone 7lbs) for this fight.
Controversial
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9172
Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29

Post by Controversial »

Decagon wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't 12 stone 2 pounds 170 pounds? And isn't 12 stone 7 pounds 175?
I just divided 172lbs by 14 (14lb in a stone) which is 12.28 and 178lbs divided by 14 is 12.71
Collins2000
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4175
Joined: 06 May 2002, 06:13

Post by Collins2000 »

Decagon wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't 12 stone 2 pounds 170 pounds? And isn't 12 stone 7 pounds 175?
Yes.

There are 14 pounds in a stone.

Gotta love those old units of measurement. What about 2 bits? Isn't that 25 cents? A bit seems almost as unusual as a stone.
The Great John L
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4351
Joined: 26 Jul 2005, 19:37

Post by The Great John L »

Collins2000 wrote:
Decagon wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't 12 stone 2 pounds 170 pounds? And isn't 12 stone 7 pounds 175?
Yes.

There are 14 pounds in a stone.

Gotta love those old units of measurement. What about 2 bits? Isn't that 25 cents? A bit seems almost as unusual as a stone.
No, a bit is one fourth of a byte...
Collins2000
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4175
Joined: 06 May 2002, 06:13

Post by Collins2000 »

The Great John L wrote:
Collins2000 wrote:
Decagon wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't 12 stone 2 pounds 170 pounds? And isn't 12 stone 7 pounds 175?
Yes.

There are 14 pounds in a stone.

Gotta love those old units of measurement. What about 2 bits? Isn't that 25 cents? A bit seems almost as unusual as a stone.
No, a bit is one fourth of a byte...
Surely you mean 1/8th
The Great John L
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4351
Joined: 26 Jul 2005, 19:37

Post by The Great John L »

Collins2000 wrote:
The Great John L wrote:
Collins2000 wrote: Yes.

There are 14 pounds in a stone.

Gotta love those old units of measurement. What about 2 bits? Isn't that 25 cents? A bit seems almost as unusual as a stone.
No, a bit is one fourth of a byte...
Surely you mean 1/8th
Yes, you are correct. :oops:
barry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3797
Joined: 28 Dec 2001, 20:00

re

Post by barry »

Try to remember this...a biography is not the be all, end of of a fighters career and as is evident a lot down through history, a lot of times a biography about a certain fighter is just complete horseshit...a good case in point is "The Devil and Sonny Liston" by Nick Toshes...the biggest percentage of that book is rubbish...it is just one example of why you should never take any one thing as the absolute fact!
silkov
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7946
Joined: 18 Aug 2003, 14:55

Re: rockyt did not retire because of patterson

Post by silkov »

Rocky50Project wrote:remember rocky was top hitter like liston, floyd would give him trouble in first rounds, no more... go under rocky biography and you will know why rocky quit, not because of floyd or anybody else, floyd did not want nothing to do with rocky in 1956 and damn it, who will wait 2 years, in that time, u no longer in top shape... :o
Dont believe everything you read... certainly when the writer says that Rocky hit like Liston... he didnt!... and its a crime really to say he did... watch their fights!... Liston was by far the heavier and faster puncher.... Rocky was a waer them down brawler who often didnt get 'going' till the 3rd or 4th rounds...
Post Reply