Both grabbed title belts in 1995. Let's imagine they both would go on to face each other in a WBC/WBA unification in 1996, instead of fighting Mike Tyson.
Who wins?
Frank Bruno vs Bruce Seldon (1996)
-
EdwardRevolver1993
- Welterweight
- Posts: 782
- Joined: 11 Apr 2016, 08:09
-
Les Norton
- Super Bantamweight
- Posts: 397
- Joined: 13 Feb 2021, 18:11
Re: Frank Bruno vs Bruce Seldon (1996)
Both could whack, both looked like bodybuilders as nd both were vulnerable to a decent shot.
I see Frank winning by knockout because he had heaps of heart and desire to win.
Seldon was generally happy to stay on the canvas until the ref reached 10
I see Frank winning by knockout because he had heaps of heart and desire to win.
Seldon was generally happy to stay on the canvas until the ref reached 10
Re: Frank Bruno vs Bruce Seldon (1996)
The Cyborg crushes the Diver.
Re: Frank Bruno vs Bruce Seldon (1996)
Bruno would knock Seldon out in 4 rounds after nailing him with a big right hand.
Re: Frank Bruno vs Bruce Seldon (1996)
Bruno, contrary to popular belief, was not 'chinny' as such. When caught by a good shot, he tended to freeze and would take shots until he dropped or the ref stopped it.
He had bottle though, good fundamentals and lots of power. Slow and ponderous, though,
Seldon was quicker, didn't hit as hard and was lacking in the heart department.
Bruno by a slow pounding, in about 8 rounds.
He had bottle though, good fundamentals and lots of power. Slow and ponderous, though,
Seldon was quicker, didn't hit as hard and was lacking in the heart department.
Bruno by a slow pounding, in about 8 rounds.
Re: Frank Bruno vs Bruce Seldon (1996)
Bruno by kayo in 5.
Re: Frank Bruno vs Bruce Seldon (1996)
Bruno by KO. Seldon had no heart.
Re: Frank Bruno vs Bruce Seldon (1996)
Bruno rarely wins these.....this one he does, Seldon was a level below.
-
Jeff_lacy_ko
- Super Featherweight
- Posts: 5711
- Joined: 06 Sep 2018, 14:15
Re: Frank Bruno vs Bruce Seldon (1996)
Seldon was terrible. Bruno was a good fighter