Deserter wrote: ↑09 Apr 2024, 14:17
jamesmcdonnell wrote: ↑09 Apr 2024, 13:57
Deserter wrote: ↑09 Apr 2024, 12:30
Spud (and for any others who may be interested). Ultimately this all depends on what your primary purpose is, but if you simply want to get your own story down in writing, either as a legacy thing or to share with family and friends, you're lucky enough to be in an era where AI tools are making that way more viable than ever before.
Check out tools like theoasis.com or otter.ai and you'll see how you can simply talk into your phone, sharing your memories, and then have the ai transcribe it for you (including in different styles). The tech is getting exponentially better by the month right now, so at the very least you should have a play around with it, and explore as I think you'll be surprised by the results.
The problem is that transcription is very different from writing, it's great if you're interviewing people. but not so good when what you're trying to do is commit your own thoughts to paper.
It works for some people. others not, certainly wouldn't hurt, but it depends on whether you find it easier to commit your thoughts by typing or dictating - personally, I always found I wrote far quicker and better than I could ever hope to communicate my thoughts by speaking, but horses for courses.
James, at least take the time to explore the tools before commenting as they are already moving well beyond standard transcription. For example, Spud could share an anecdote regarding his time with the Klitschkos and Oasis will give the option to write it in different styles ranging from a TED talk through to a New York Times article
There's a reality where a very high percentage of users on this forum aren't strong enough writers to get published and yet some of those same people would feel more comfortable and confident sharing their story 'in conversation' - tools like this potentially give them a route that has never been open to them before, which can only be a good thing.
I think Spud has the chops for writing already though, from his previous forays nto this area.
I said in my own post there's no harm in exploring these tools. I use otter, and it's not terribly good, it often creates unintellible gargage, because it has no ability to understand context, it is only giving the appearance of it.
However, I work in an industry where AI is discussed at length (namely Broadcast and Telecoms), and there's been much talk of it superseding human creativity.I also work with specialists in AI science and data management, (my company teaches people about it) and the truth is, if you ask experts on the subjects, that these tools are still very crude, compared to what the human brain produces, you have to remember, they are all trained on LLM's and all of those are in turn just regurgitating patterns, there's no actual creation going on there - and I am afraid, it shows.
I'd say use them if you wanted to think on the fly, and flesh out a synposis that is transcribed, but using AI tools to write a book - nah, it will be shite. If you don't think you can write your own, try first, and if you cannot, get someone who is a skilled enough writer to help you. If all else fails, if you have the money, get someone to write it for you, but if you're suggesting that AI tools can be used to create an entire book, then well yes, it might, but it will be crap.