Mike McCallum vs. Frank Tate

Post Reply
Vlad
Bantamweight
Posts: 1626
Joined: 15 Feb 2022, 02:15

Mike McCallum vs. Frank Tate

Post by Vlad »

160,12 rounds.
Noxy
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6824
Joined: 02 Jun 2013, 10:57

Re: Mike McCallum vs. Frank Tate

Post by Noxy »

Tate
goose 5
Super Featherweight
Posts: 6061
Joined: 12 Sep 2018, 20:20

Re: Mike McCallum vs. Frank Tate

Post by goose 5 »

MCCallum on points.
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15666
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Re: Mike McCallum vs. Frank Tate

Post by elmersalsa »

Mike McCallum by decision. He was in another class. In another level.
tiny_acres
Middleweight
Posts: 9432
Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43

Re: Mike McCallum vs. Frank Tate

Post by tiny_acres »

elmersalsa wrote: 12 Apr 2024, 20:19 Mike McCallum by decision. He was in another class. In another level.
X2
scorpio83
Middleweight
Posts: 4592
Joined: 18 Aug 2013, 06:01

Re: Mike McCallum vs. Frank Tate

Post by scorpio83 »

Either the Bodysnatcher take by decision or stopping Tate late after landing body punches after body punches along with his jabs and combinations.
Nile4000
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7132
Joined: 17 Sep 2005, 15:21

Re: Mike McCallum vs. Frank Tate

Post by Nile4000 »

McCallum by UD.
tiny_acres
Middleweight
Posts: 9432
Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43

Re: Mike McCallum vs. Frank Tate

Post by tiny_acres »

McCallum by wide decision
Post Reply