Dazn

SeanBrennan
Bantamweight
Posts: 9863
Joined: 12 Feb 2022, 12:45

Re: Dazn

Post by SeanBrennan »

jwfg wrote: 22 Apr 2024, 14:50 I pay annually and consider it fantastic value.
I have no issue with the cost, there are some really good non-MR cards on it too. I also like the kickboxing they show and MMA-type fights.
SeanBrennan
Bantamweight
Posts: 9863
Joined: 12 Feb 2022, 12:45

Re: Dazn

Post by SeanBrennan »

hope you're well Jwfg.
jwfg
Super Flyweight
Posts: 2607
Joined: 11 Mar 2023, 19:21

Re: Dazn

Post by jwfg »

SeanBrennan wrote: 22 Apr 2024, 17:18 hope you're well Jwfg.
I'm good Sean. :TU: Hope you are too.
SeanBrennan
Bantamweight
Posts: 9863
Joined: 12 Feb 2022, 12:45

Re: Dazn

Post by SeanBrennan »

jwfg wrote: 22 Apr 2024, 19:08
SeanBrennan wrote: 22 Apr 2024, 17:18 hope you're well Jwfg.
I'm good Sean. :TU: Hope you are too.
Glad you're well mate. I am good, really enjoying work and life so feeling very grateful.
Glass Joe
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 4997
Joined: 08 Feb 2012, 10:29

Re: Dazn

Post by Glass Joe »



Probably why your bill going up with bids like that :OhYes: :OhYes:
maverick23
Cruiserweight
Posts: 10375
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20

Re: Dazn

Post by maverick23 »

Glass Joe wrote: 24 Apr 2024, 09:16

Probably why your bill going up with bids like that :OhYes: :OhYes:
There’s no way Ennis will be getting 85% of that bid - he’ll be getting his contractual minimum.

When it’s an 85%/15% split its rare for the champ’s promoter not to win the bid because of how it can be manipulated.
JamesPhilips
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 6490
Joined: 19 Mar 2021, 06:43

Re: Dazn

Post by JamesPhilips »

maverick23 wrote: 24 Apr 2024, 11:01
Glass Joe wrote: 24 Apr 2024, 09:16

Probably why your bill going up with bids like that :OhYes: :OhYes:
There’s no way Ennis will be getting 85% of that bid - he’ll be getting his contractual minimum.

When it’s an 85%/15% split its rare for the champ’s promoter not to win the bid because of how it can be manipulated.
How does that work?
SeanBrennan
Bantamweight
Posts: 9863
Joined: 12 Feb 2022, 12:45

Re: Dazn

Post by SeanBrennan »

JamesPhilips wrote: 24 Apr 2024, 11:16
maverick23 wrote: 24 Apr 2024, 11:01
Glass Joe wrote: 24 Apr 2024, 09:16

Probably why your bill going up with bids like that :OhYes: :OhYes:
There’s no way Ennis will be getting 85% of that bid - he’ll be getting his contractual minimum.

When it’s an 85%/15% split its rare for the champ’s promoter not to win the bid because of how it can be manipulated.
How does that work?
I'm intrigued too I find all the finance stuff fascinating
maverick23
Cruiserweight
Posts: 10375
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20

Re: Dazn

Post by maverick23 »

JamesPhilips wrote: 24 Apr 2024, 11:16
maverick23 wrote: 24 Apr 2024, 11:01
Glass Joe wrote: 24 Apr 2024, 09:16

Probably why your bill going up with bids like that :OhYes: :OhYes:
There’s no way Ennis will be getting 85% of that bid - he’ll be getting his contractual minimum.

When it’s an 85%/15% split its rare for the champ’s promoter not to win the bid because of how it can be manipulated.
How does that work?
Matchroom will have a contract with Ennis to pay him a certain amount per fight. Say it’s $2m. They’d have made an agreement that that’s what would be paid if they win a purse bid (it’s probably contractual) to give them a greater chance of winning the bid.

It’s pretty common with purse bids of this nature. It was widely expected that Fury didn’t get the amount per purse bids of the Whyte fight because of it.
JamesPhilips
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 6490
Joined: 19 Mar 2021, 06:43

Re: Dazn

Post by JamesPhilips »

maverick23 wrote: 24 Apr 2024, 11:37
JamesPhilips wrote: 24 Apr 2024, 11:16
maverick23 wrote: 24 Apr 2024, 11:01

There’s no way Ennis will be getting 85% of that bid - he’ll be getting his contractual minimum.

When it’s an 85%/15% split its rare for the champ’s promoter not to win the bid because of how it can be manipulated.
How does that work?
Matchroom will have a contract with Ennis to pay him a certain amount per fight. Say it’s $2m. They’d have made an agreement that that’s what would be paid if they win a purse bid (it’s probably contractual) to give them a greater chance of winning the bid.

It’s pretty common with purse bids of this nature. It was widely expected that Fury didn’t get the amount per purse bids of the Whyte fight because of it.
Damn that sounds borderline illegal
maverick23
Cruiserweight
Posts: 10375
Joined: 26 Feb 2011, 18:20

Re: Dazn

Post by maverick23 »

JamesPhilips wrote: 24 Apr 2024, 11:52
maverick23 wrote: 24 Apr 2024, 11:37
JamesPhilips wrote: 24 Apr 2024, 11:16

How does that work?
Matchroom will have a contract with Ennis to pay him a certain amount per fight. Say it’s $2m. They’d have made an agreement that that’s what would be paid if they win a purse bid (it’s probably contractual) to give them a greater chance of winning the bid.

It’s pretty common with purse bids of this nature. It was widely expected that Fury didn’t get the amount per purse bids of the Whyte fight because of it.
Damn that sounds borderline illegal
It’s not that bad. They’ll be getting paid what’s in their contract. If the other promoter wins the bid then they can take the fight across the road for more money (albeit would likely have to give their promoter 10%).
Rockytony67
Super Middleweight
Posts: 175
Joined: 22 Oct 2012, 13:27

Re: Dazn

Post by Rockytony67 »

Like a few on here, I cancelled Dazn when the price went up to £14.95 but I got this email yesterday.


"£7.49/month for 12 months
Get back on DAZN now and enjoy an exclusive limited time offer to watch the British blockbuster rematch between Josh Taylor & Jack Catterall, live Saturday from 7pm.

Exclusive: Invitation only offer for #####
Must be claimed with your DAZN account email address: ###########

CLAIM SPECIAL OFFER
OFFER ENDS MIDNIGHT SATURDAY 25 MAY
Terms apply."


Did anyone else get it? I'm going to rejoin it's cheaper now than before :yay: they must have had quite a few cancel.
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 102313
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Dazn

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

Rockytony67 wrote: 24 May 2024, 07:23 Like a few on here, I cancelled Dazn when the price went up to £14.95 but I got this email yesterday.
"£7.49/month for 12 months
I take it's a 12 month contract thing.
paultom
Super Bantamweight
Posts: 553
Joined: 26 May 2021, 16:21

Re: Dazn

Post by paultom »

Rockytony67 wrote: 24 May 2024, 07:23 Like a few on here, I cancelled Dazn when the price went up to £14.95 but I got this email yesterday.


"£7.49/month for 12 months
Get back on DAZN now and enjoy an exclusive limited time offer to watch the British blockbuster rematch between Josh Taylor & Jack Catterall, live Saturday from 7pm.

Exclusive: Invitation only offer for #####
Must be claimed with your DAZN account email address: ###########

CLAIM SPECIAL OFFER
OFFER ENDS MIDNIGHT SATURDAY 25 MAY
Terms apply."


Did anyone else get it? I'm going to rejoin it's cheaper now than before :yay: they must have had quite a few cancel.
I must be a tight arse,I cancelled when it went up from £2.99 a month :lol:
Heldenjaeger
Super Welterweight
Posts: 291
Joined: 30 May 2015, 06:53

Re: Dazn

Post by Heldenjaeger »

My DAZN membership is 24.99 EUR per month. I had to subscribe to buy the Fury vs Usyk PPV which was another 24.99 EUR.

The 5 vs 5 card is a PPV for 19.99 EUR. Where is that money going to? What are they doing with it? The sportswashing program of Saudi Arabia covers all the expenses already. It's a total rip-off.
Rockytony67
Super Middleweight
Posts: 175
Joined: 22 Oct 2012, 13:27

Re: Dazn

Post by Rockytony67 »

Ruthless-RKO wrote: 24 May 2024, 08:05
Rockytony67 wrote: 24 May 2024, 07:23 Like a few on here, I cancelled Dazn when the price went up to £14.95 but I got this email yesterday.
"£7.49/month for 12 months
I take it's a 12 month contract thing.
Yes, it is.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32853
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Dazn

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Only mugs would be paying full price :lol:
Ruthless-RKO
Welterweight
Posts: 102313
Joined: 24 Apr 2016, 11:59

Re: Dazn

Post by Ruthless-RKO »

I got the email too
joshj909
Lightweight
Posts: 5957
Joined: 01 Dec 2017, 06:16

Re: Dazn

Post by joshj909 »



Matchroom and Queensbury both on DAZN is good for UK fans. Sky Sports must be wondering what they can do the get Boxxer out while TNT will also be looking for a new promoter.
SeanBrennan
Bantamweight
Posts: 9863
Joined: 12 Feb 2022, 12:45

Re: Dazn

Post by SeanBrennan »

joshj909 wrote: 20 Jul 2024, 14:53

Matchroom and Queensbury both on DAZN is good for UK fans. Sky Sports must be wondering what they can do the get Boxxer out while TNT will also be looking for a new promoter.
this is good news imo
Delta Jay
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1909
Joined: 26 Jun 2013, 15:19

Re: Dazn

Post by Delta Jay »

Whattt

I never even entertained the thought of two promoters with the same broadcaster. Does that make the cross-promo fights easier to make now? Will we get more channel 5 fight nights? Who do you pay your subs to, if you can’t get away with it?
joshj909
Lightweight
Posts: 5957
Joined: 01 Dec 2017, 06:16

Re: Dazn

Post by joshj909 »

Delta Jay wrote: 21 Jul 2024, 08:14 Whattt

I never even entertained the thought of two promoters with the same broadcaster. Does that make the cross-promo fights easier to make now? Will we get more channel 5 fight nights? Who do you pay your subs to, if you can’t get away with it?
Well, those who are contractually obliged to fight on a network won't have an excuse anymore so that would be worked out. Networks won't have to be involved in the negotiations as much. Especially considering the collaboration in the Saudi events you can see Hearn and Warren co-promoting much more. I don't see any negatives other than its an extra expense for those who already pay for Sky and TNT. I do also see this possibly leading to more UK PPVs on DAZN though...
Delta Jay
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1909
Joined: 26 Jun 2013, 15:19

Re: Dazn

Post by Delta Jay »

joshj909 wrote: 21 Jul 2024, 09:18
Delta Jay wrote: 21 Jul 2024, 08:14 Whattt

I never even entertained the thought of two promoters with the same broadcaster. Does that make the cross-promo fights easier to make now? Will we get more channel 5 fight nights? Who do you pay your subs to, if you can’t get away with it?
Well, those who are contractually obliged to fight on a network won't have an excuse anymore so that would be worked out. Networks won't have to be involved in the negotiations as much. Especially considering the collaboration in the Saudi events you can see Hearn and Warren co-promoting much more. I don't see any negatives other than its an extra expense for those who already pay for Sky and TNT. I do also see this possibly leading to more UK PPVs on DAZN though...
Thanks for answering my question in informed and clear manner my mate.

Most of the lads on the board are keen fishermen and that won’t effect us. So better fights for the same price? Sounds good man
magnus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1166
Joined: 13 Dec 2004, 08:59

Re: Dazn

Post by magnus »

I've come to like DAZN - there's a lot of boxing shows now (some obscure, but we liked that about allegedly) and lots of other combat sports, including Bellator/PFL. The interface has been improved, it's much easier to watch stuff the next day without having the result spoiled and it runs well as an app via Sky Stream for me.

That said, I'm still not convinced it's the way forward for the big promotional companies. It's very anecdotal - but I occasionally look on boxing threads on Reddit - there was WAY more interaction on the Top Rank show that lost it's headliner than there was the Boots Ennis fight - and he's supposed to be a big name.

I have doubts that Eddie or Frank will be able to create stars on the platform. It's ok with the established names - Fury and Joshua etc, but can the next big British fighter be built on DAZN?

None of my casual mates subscribe - these are the guys who watch occasional fight nights on Sky and BT/TNT and who almost always shell out for the Sky PPV nights. The Sky machine can make stars - but can DAZN? As things stand, I doubt it.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32853
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Dazn

Post by Boxerbeetle »

magnus wrote: 21 Jul 2024, 13:22 I've come to like DAZN - there's a lot of boxing shows now (some obscure, but we liked that about allegedly) and lots of other combat sports, including Bellator/PFL. The interface has been improved, it's much easier to watch stuff the next day without having the result spoiled and it runs well as an app via Sky Stream for me.

That said, I'm still not convinced it's the way forward for the big promotional companies. It's very anecdotal - but I occasionally look on boxing threads on Reddit - there was WAY more interaction on the Top Rank show that lost it's headliner than there was the Boots Ennis fight - and he's supposed to be a big name.

I have doubts that Eddie or Frank will be able to create stars on the platform. It's ok with the established names - Fury and Joshua etc, but can the next big British fighter be built on DAZN?

None of my casual mates subscribe - these are the guys who watch occasional fight nights on Sky and BT/TNT and who almost always shell out for the Sky PPV nights. The Sky machine can make stars - but can DAZN? As things stand, I doubt it.
I go on the Boxing sub quite frequently. Very mixed bag in terms of quality, but there's some decent knowledge on there tbf. The amount of traffic it gets is crazy compared to this forum, it's like the fast lane of a motorway vs cycling around a village green :lol:
Post Reply